From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: zhengyejian@huaweicloud.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org,foersleo@amazon.de,shakeel.butt@linux.dev,sieberf@amazon.com,sj@kernel.org,stable@vger.kernel.org,yeweihua4@huawei.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/damon/vaddr: fix issue in damon_va_evenly_split_region()" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2024 11:16:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024120624-repeater-require-e263@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x f3c7a1ede435e2e45177d7a490a85fb0a0ec96d1
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024120624-repeater-require-e263@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From f3c7a1ede435e2e45177d7a490a85fb0a0ec96d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 16:39:26 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] mm/damon/vaddr: fix issue in damon_va_evenly_split_region()
Patch series "mm/damon/vaddr: Fix issue in
damon_va_evenly_split_region()". v2.
According to the logic of damon_va_evenly_split_region(), currently
following split case would not meet the expectation:
Suppose DAMON_MIN_REGION=0x1000,
Case: Split [0x0, 0x3000) into 2 pieces, then the result would be
acutually 3 regions:
[0x0, 0x1000), [0x1000, 0x2000), [0x2000, 0x3000)
but NOT the expected 2 regions:
[0x0, 0x1000), [0x1000, 0x3000) !!!
The root cause is that when calculating size of each split piece in
damon_va_evenly_split_region():
`sz_piece = ALIGN_DOWN(sz_orig / nr_pieces, DAMON_MIN_REGION);`
both the dividing and the ALIGN_DOWN may cause loss of precision, then
each time split one piece of size 'sz_piece' from origin 'start' to 'end'
would cause more pieces are split out than expected!!!
To fix it, count for each piece split and make sure no more than
'nr_pieces'. In addition, add above case into damon_test_split_evenly().
And add 'nr_piece == 1' check in damon_va_evenly_split_region() for better
code readability and add a corresponding kunit testcase.
This patch (of 2):
According to the logic of damon_va_evenly_split_region(), currently
following split case would not meet the expectation:
Suppose DAMON_MIN_REGION=0x1000,
Case: Split [0x0, 0x3000) into 2 pieces, then the result would be
acutually 3 regions:
[0x0, 0x1000), [0x1000, 0x2000), [0x2000, 0x3000)
but NOT the expected 2 regions:
[0x0, 0x1000), [0x1000, 0x3000) !!!
The root cause is that when calculating size of each split piece in
damon_va_evenly_split_region():
`sz_piece = ALIGN_DOWN(sz_orig / nr_pieces, DAMON_MIN_REGION);`
both the dividing and the ALIGN_DOWN may cause loss of precision,
then each time split one piece of size 'sz_piece' from origin 'start' to
'end' would cause more pieces are split out than expected!!!
To fix it, count for each piece split and make sure no more than
'nr_pieces'. In addition, add above case into damon_test_split_evenly().
After this patch, damon-operations test passed:
# ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run damon-operations
[...]
============== damon-operations (6 subtests) ===============
[PASSED] damon_test_three_regions_in_vmas
[PASSED] damon_test_apply_three_regions1
[PASSED] damon_test_apply_three_regions2
[PASSED] damon_test_apply_three_regions3
[PASSED] damon_test_apply_three_regions4
[PASSED] damon_test_split_evenly
================ [PASSED] damon-operations =================
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241022083927.3592237-1-zhengyejian@huaweicloud.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241022083927.3592237-2-zhengyejian@huaweicloud.com
Fixes: 3f49584b262c ("mm/damon: implement primitives for the virtual memory address spaces")
Signed-off-by: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Fernand Sieber <sieberf@amazon.com>
Cc: Leonard Foerster <foersleo@amazon.de>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: Ye Weihua <yeweihua4@huawei.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/mm/damon/tests/vaddr-kunit.h b/mm/damon/tests/vaddr-kunit.h
index 3dad8dfd9005..fcdccb614fd8 100644
--- a/mm/damon/tests/vaddr-kunit.h
+++ b/mm/damon/tests/vaddr-kunit.h
@@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ static void damon_test_split_evenly(struct kunit *test)
damon_test_split_evenly_fail(test, 0, 100, 0);
damon_test_split_evenly_succ(test, 0, 100, 10);
damon_test_split_evenly_succ(test, 5, 59, 5);
+ damon_test_split_evenly_succ(test, 0, 3, 2);
damon_test_split_evenly_fail(test, 5, 6, 2);
}
diff --git a/mm/damon/vaddr.c b/mm/damon/vaddr.c
index 821990d0141a..86f612fbf886 100644
--- a/mm/damon/vaddr.c
+++ b/mm/damon/vaddr.c
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static int damon_va_evenly_split_region(struct damon_target *t,
unsigned long sz_orig, sz_piece, orig_end;
struct damon_region *n = NULL, *next;
unsigned long start;
+ unsigned int i;
if (!r || !nr_pieces)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -80,8 +81,7 @@ static int damon_va_evenly_split_region(struct damon_target *t,
r->ar.end = r->ar.start + sz_piece;
next = damon_next_region(r);
- for (start = r->ar.end; start + sz_piece <= orig_end;
- start += sz_piece) {
+ for (start = r->ar.end, i = 1; i < nr_pieces; start += sz_piece, i++) {
n = damon_new_region(start, start + sz_piece);
if (!n)
return -ENOMEM;
next reply other threads:[~2024-12-06 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-06 10:16 gregkh [this message]
2024-12-06 17:53 ` [PATCH 6.1.y] mm/damon/vaddr: fix issue in damon_va_evenly_split_region() SeongJae Park
2024-12-07 2:07 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024120624-repeater-require-e263@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=foersleo@amazon.de \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=sieberf@amazon.com \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yeweihua4@huawei.com \
--cc=zhengyejian@huaweicloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox