From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ECA91A2860; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 12:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733834268; cv=none; b=nM/kUfBWXrOwQQeN0WaJsjUQGXJKC9WxtQqErqH3pgwa88/nRy3uer1VTF7VbfNKefBoeoZ8YLu1v/JPR9SYtU9xb7IkVdsO064yYA16xpaDGgOZOj7bMHqzE/U9UhDgIJs4GdMjvBSU3LYKT0KLdm0KzGtljCTHyVCz7gpD82g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733834268; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yT+2etRjcgkDFWD03R9C8TI0zCspIsiAJ5OYsndSpFA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ppJsrRpG1mMvPcS11M6foPZiB3NrURIt7eEFB6o3IVnTLWDmawNOvBPrKDdhm5HG3e+68Y+l+LTvxV5ifSX/OnJlUadiuC+zSIh3ggNgyIW52rl4yEeiN3bjFWbhDXIU9gDM2cYfqgeS4bn3JSymInbO2UVZ93+1pffEKzNvY38= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=acbzj30F; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="acbzj30F" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67AA1C4CED6; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 12:37:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1733834267; bh=yT+2etRjcgkDFWD03R9C8TI0zCspIsiAJ5OYsndSpFA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=acbzj30FlK2EmvlLToH6QFS188H3wkR00SNtGXFoyXfo7grjKoQlB4SrcSoHAL9XJ 9l3MKDEFHD8hdBLasqB681IDSjuNhKX5BhkWKO30ICYOu/pdrsYMLXzzwMUbU2A+VE 8cHX00vEWt10382+pbKfofAHT8L+umujoA21BX/o= Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 13:37:11 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Jani Nikula Cc: Genes Lists , Sakari Ailus , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, bingbu.cao@intel.com, Rodrigo Vivi , Joonas Lahtinen , Tvrtko Ursulin , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: Linux 6.12.4 - crash dma_alloc_attrs+0x12b via ipu6 Message-ID: <2024121001-senator-raffle-a371@gregkh> References: <2024120917-vision-outcast-85f2@gregkh> <87seqvzzg6.fsf@intel.com> <87bjxjzpwn.fsf@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87bjxjzpwn.fsf@intel.com> On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 02:24:56PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 10 Dec 2024, Genes Lists wrote: > > On Tue, 2024-12-10 at 10:58 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > >> On Tue, 10 Dec 2024, Sakari Ailus > >> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > > ... > >> > > FYI 6.12.4 got a crash shortly after booting in dma_alloc_attrs - > >> > > maybe > >> > > triggered in ipu6_probe. Crash only happened on laptop with ipu6. > >> > > All > >> > > other machines are running fine. > >> > > >> > Have you read the dmesg further than the IPU6 related warning? The > >> > IPU6 > >> > driver won't work (maybe not even probe?) but if the system > >> > crashes, it > >> > appears unlikely the IPU6 drivers would have something to do with > >> > that. > >> > Look for warnings on linked list corruption later, they seem to be > >> > coming > >> > from the i915 driver. > >> > >> And the list corruption is actually happening in > >> cpu_latency_qos_update_request(). I don't see any i915 changes in > >> 6.12.4 > >> that could cause it. > >> > >> I guess the question is, when did it work? Did 6.12.3 work? > >> > >> > >> BR, > >> Jani. > > > > > > - 6.12.1 worked > > > > - mainline - works (but only with i915 patch set [1] otherwise there > > are no graphics at all) > > > > [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/141911/ > > > > - 6.12.3 - crashed (i see i915 not ipu6) and again it has   > > cpu_latency_qos_update_request+0x61/0xc0 > > Thanks for testing. > > There are no changes to either i915 or kernel/power between 6.12.1 and > 6.12.4. > > There are some changes to drm core, but none that could explain this. > > Maybe try the same kernels a few more times to see if it's really > deterministic? Not that I have obvious ideas where to go from there, but > it's a clue nonetheless. 'git bisect' would be nice to run if possible...