From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD32980C02 for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2024 18:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734199608; cv=none; b=poZK56fmw+WTgtCqCMphAWTn72sS39tY3tbtuVlr4Byv4yv765kUcaue+e4TJl3bxk0r1OElO5QAkEDKeF1pcE7LacGj/xJCMrZ9SfUc7+bFzQSMoHsAXgHzlTN2nWC+DV4o37NHYBZUhnE1IG0t6ZUL4At6b5qMtsPOFjdsG2Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734199608; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7ShFlV/aEY0xFV8Df0SgwnbY++2hK8qtC/OABaYp+6Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=XmgJy8GJczZZvNVAE0gKxq0/yKiFwI0uVNvcXNKJdpbB45t8WY8Ma7QUBma+jnShaTvx7Uyrf4ZYcrqih9qocYuq4146sd/kwNjJn31CUgIc0vAy/6rIcto4hQwL+E+Hf8oOG5gAjw4Kgq5OwqBT/33GSNgWpUnb6nVk4MWN7zY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=AIJmeqD7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="AIJmeqD7" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E0B71C4CED1; Sat, 14 Dec 2024 18:06:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1734199607; bh=7ShFlV/aEY0xFV8Df0SgwnbY++2hK8qtC/OABaYp+6Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=AIJmeqD7fvWD3OVV0Worqua9y8uM5V/7ml0h4lVK2i4emQ83/F4tMN/xmhvEJmlRz qakpqmR/gYsxdBsoNuyE0lTZSjNCRQUG8Yusb5OkQYgQmDNqEb/nd91gKX0mqV6tzq xhT0OjkOtXR5pTjSs2HqWYQM2SyyBRlwuSuTdgF8= Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 19:06:43 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Sherry Yang Cc: Sasha Levin , "stable@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15.y, 5.10.y] exfat: fix potential deadlock on __exfat_get_dentry_set Message-ID: <2024121419-cupcake-fantasy-92dd@gregkh> References: <20241214091651-0af6196918c18d20@stable.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 05:57:01PM +0000, Sherry Yang wrote: > Hi, > > > On Dec 14, 2024, at 6:26 AM, Sasha Levin wrote: > > > > [ Sasha's backport helper bot ] > > > > Hi, > > > > The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: 89fc548767a2155231128cb98726d6d2ea1256c9 > > > > WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and upstream commit: > > Backport author: Sherry Yang > > Commit author: Sungjong Seo > > > > > > Status in newer kernel trees: > > 6.12.y | Present (exact SHA1) > > 6.6.y | Present (different SHA1: a7ac198f8dba) > > 6.1.y | Not found > > 5.15.y | Not found > > I didn’t backport the commit to linux-stable-6.1.y, because 6.1.y didn’t backport the culprit commit > a3ff29a95fde ("exfat: support dynamic allocate bh for exfat_entry_set_cache”), so not influenced. > > However, both linux-stable-5.15.y and linux-stable-5.10.y actually backported the culprit commit. So I’m trying to fix it on 5.15.y and 5.10.y. > > Let me know if you have more questions about it. That's confusing, why doesn't 6.1.y have that commit? Shouldn't we also add it there along with this one? thanks, greg k-h