Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@qq.com>,
	Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org,
	syzbot+ec07f6f5ce62b858579f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 12:53:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241219115301.465396-1-amir73il@gmail.com> (raw)

Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem >encode_fh()
method that may fail for various reasons.

The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and
name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility
of failure to encode a file handle.

There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that
currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when ->encode_fh() fails.
Relax those assertions because they are wrong.

The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 ("ovl: support
encoding non-decodable file handles") in v6.6 as the regressing commit,
but this is not accurate.

The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion
and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs,
inotify and drop_caches.

Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and
other reasons of ->encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was
also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlayfs that is
mounted with options index=on,nfs_export=on also on kernels < v6.6.
Therefore, I am not listing the aforementioned commit as a Fixes commit.

Backport hint: this patch will have a trivial conflict applying to
v6.6.y, and other trivial conflicts applying to stable kernels < v6.6.

Reported-by: syzbot+ec07f6f5ce62b858579f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Tested-by: syzbot+ec07f6f5ce62b858579f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/671fd40c.050a0220.4735a.024f.GAE@google.com/
Reported-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/CAGrbwDTLt6drB9eaUagnQVgdPBmhLfqqxAf3F+Juqy_o6oP8uw@mail.gmail.com/
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
---

Christian,

I could have sumbitted two independant patches to relax the assertion
in fsnotify and overlayfs via fsnotify and overlayfs trees, but the
nature of the problem is the same and in both cases, the problem became
worse with the introduction of non-decodable file handles support,
so decided to fix them together and ask you to take the fix via the
vfs tree.

Please let you if you think it should be done differently.

Thanks,
Amir.

 fs/notify/fdinfo.c     | 4 +---
 fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c | 5 ++---
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/notify/fdinfo.c b/fs/notify/fdinfo.c
index dec553034027e..e933f9c65d904 100644
--- a/fs/notify/fdinfo.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fdinfo.c
@@ -47,10 +47,8 @@ static void show_mark_fhandle(struct seq_file *m, struct inode *inode)
 	size = f->handle_bytes >> 2;
 
 	ret = exportfs_encode_fid(inode, (struct fid *)f->f_handle, &size);
-	if ((ret == FILEID_INVALID) || (ret < 0)) {
-		WARN_ONCE(1, "Can't encode file handler for inotify: %d\n", ret);
+	if ((ret == FILEID_INVALID) || (ret < 0))
 		return;
-	}
 
 	f->handle_type = ret;
 	f->handle_bytes = size * sizeof(u32);
diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c b/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
index 3601ddfeddc2e..56eee9f23ea9a 100644
--- a/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
@@ -442,9 +442,8 @@ struct ovl_fh *ovl_encode_real_fh(struct ovl_fs *ofs, struct dentry *real,
 	buflen = (dwords << 2);
 
 	err = -EIO;
-	if (WARN_ON(fh_type < 0) ||
-	    WARN_ON(buflen > MAX_HANDLE_SZ) ||
-	    WARN_ON(fh_type == FILEID_INVALID))
+	if (fh_type < 0 || fh_type == FILEID_INVALID ||
+	    WARN_ON(buflen > MAX_HANDLE_SZ))
 		goto out_err;
 
 	fh->fb.version = OVL_FH_VERSION;
-- 
2.34.1


             reply	other threads:[~2024-12-19 11:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-19 11:53 Amir Goldstein [this message]
2024-12-19 14:03 ` [PATCH] fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles Amir Goldstein
2024-12-19 14:18 ` Christian Brauner
2024-12-19 15:46 ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241219115301.465396-1-amir73il@gmail.com \
    --to=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=dima@arista.com \
    --cc=eadavis@qq.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+ec07f6f5ce62b858579f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox