public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Selvarasu Ganesan <selvarasu.g@samsung.com>
Cc: quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com, kees@kernel.org,
	abdul.rahim@myyahoo.com, m.grzeschik@pengutronix.de,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jh0801.jung@samsung.com, dh10.jung@samsung.com,
	naushad@samsung.com, akash.m5@samsung.com, rc93.raju@samsung.com,
	taehyun.cho@samsung.com, hongpooh.kim@samsung.com,
	eomji.oh@samsung.com, shijie.cai@samsung.com,
	alim.akhtar@samsung.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: f_midi: Fixing wMaxPacketSize exceeded issue during MIDI bind retries
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 16:15:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024122007-flail-traverse-b7b8@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a1dedf06-e804-4580-a690-25e55312eab8@samsung.com>

On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 07:02:06PM +0530, Selvarasu Ganesan wrote:
> 
> On 12/20/2024 5:54 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 03:51:50PM +0530, Selvarasu Ganesan wrote:
> >> On 12/18/2024 11:01 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Dec 08, 2024 at 08:53:20PM +0530, Selvarasu Ganesan wrote:
> >>>> The current implementation sets the wMaxPacketSize of bulk in/out
> >>>> endpoints to 1024 bytes at the end of the f_midi_bind function. However,
> >>>> in cases where there is a failure in the first midi bind attempt,
> >>>> consider rebinding.
> >>> What considers rebinding?  Your change does not modify that.
> >> Hi Greg,
> >> Thanks for your review comments.
> >>
> >>
> >> Here the term "rebind" in this context refers to attempting to bind the
> >> MIDI function a second time in certain scenarios.
> >> The situations where rebinding is considered include:
> >>
> >>    * When there is a failure in the first UDC write attempt, which may be
> >>      caused by other functions bind along with MIDI
> >>    * Runtime composition change : Example : MIDI,ADB to MIDI. Or MIDI to
> >>      MIDI,ADB
> >>
> >> The issue arises during the second time the "f_midi_bind" function is
> >> called. The problem lies in the fact that the size of
> >> "bulk_in_desc.wMaxPacketSize" is set to 1024 during the first call,
> >> which exceeds the hardware capability of the dwc3 TX/RX FIFO
> >> (ep->maxpacket_limit = 512).
> > Ok, but then why not properly reset ALL of the options/values when a
> > failure happens, not just this one when the initialization happens
> > again?  Odds are you might be missing the change of something else here
> > as well, right?
> Are you suggesting that we reset the entire value of 
> usb_endpoint_descriptor before call usb_ep_autoconfig? If so, Sorry I am 
> not clear on your reasoning for wanting to reset all options/values. 
> After all, all values will be overwritten 
> afterusb_ep_autoconfig.Additionally, the wMaxPacketSize is the only 
> value being checked during the EP claim process (usb_ep_autoconfig), and 
> it has caused issues where claiming wMaxPacketSize is grater than 
> ep->maxpacket_limit.

Then fix up that value on failure, if things fail you should reset it
back to a "known good state", right?  And what's wrong with resetting
all of the values anyway, wouldn't that be the correct thing to do?

> > Also, cleaning up from an error is a better thing to do than forcing
> > something to be set all the time when you don't have anything gone
> > wrong.
> As I previously mentioned, this is a general approach to set 
> wMaxPacketSize before claiming the endpoint. This is because the 
> usb_ep_autoconfig treats endpoint descriptors as if they were full 
> speed. Following the same pattern as other function drivers, that 
> approach allows us to claim the EP with using a full-speed descriptor. 
> We can use the same approach here instead of resetting wMaxPacketSize 
> every time.
> 
> The following provided code is used to claim an EP with a full-speed 
> bulk descriptor in MIDI. Its also working solution.  But, We thinking 
> that it may unnecessarily complicate the code as it only utilizes the 
> full descriptor for obtaining the EP address here. What you think shall 
> we go with below approach instead of rest wMaxPacketSize before call 
> usb_ep_autoconfig?

I don't know, what do you think is best to do?  You are the one having
problems and will need to fix any bugs that your changes will cause :)

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-20 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20241208152338epcas5p4fde427bb4467414417083221067ac7ab@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2024-12-08 15:23 ` [PATCH] usb: gadget: f_midi: Fixing wMaxPacketSize exceeded issue during MIDI bind retries Selvarasu Ganesan
2024-12-10  9:53   ` Selvarasu Ganesan
2024-12-10 10:18     ` Greg KH
2024-12-10 14:11       ` Selvarasu Ganesan
2024-12-10 14:25         ` Greg KH
2024-12-12 12:28           ` Selvarasu Ganesan
2024-12-18  5:31   ` Greg KH
2024-12-18 10:21     ` Selvarasu Ganesan
2024-12-18 15:51       ` Alan Stern
2024-12-19  4:06         ` Selvarasu Ganesan
2024-12-20 12:24       ` Greg KH
2024-12-20 13:32         ` Selvarasu Ganesan
2024-12-20 15:15           ` Greg KH [this message]
2024-12-21 18:07             ` Selvarasu Ganesan
2025-01-06  5:17               ` Selvarasu Ganesan
2025-01-16  5:19               ` Selvarasu Ganesan
2025-01-17 11:05                 ` Greg KH
2025-01-18  6:09                   ` Selvarasu Ganesan
     [not found] <CGME20241208151349epcas5p1a94ca45020318f54885072d4987160b3@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2024-12-08 15:13 ` Faraz Ata
2024-12-08 15:28   ` Selvarasu Ganesan
2024-12-08 15:48     ` Greg KH
2024-12-08 16:00       ` Selvarasu Ganesan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2024122007-flail-traverse-b7b8@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=abdul.rahim@myyahoo.com \
    --cc=akash.m5@samsung.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=dh10.jung@samsung.com \
    --cc=eomji.oh@samsung.com \
    --cc=hongpooh.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=jh0801.jung@samsung.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.grzeschik@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=naushad@samsung.com \
    --cc=quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rc93.raju@samsung.com \
    --cc=selvarasu.g@samsung.com \
    --cc=shijie.cai@samsung.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=taehyun.cho@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox