From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
arnd@arndb.de, ak@linux.intel.com, kees@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 10/10] poll_wait: add mb() to fix theoretical race between waitqueue_active() and .poll()
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 13:35:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250113183537.1784136-10-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250113183537.1784136-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit cacd9ae4bf801ff4125d8961bb9a3ba955e51680 ]
As the comment above waitqueue_active() explains, it can only be used
if both waker and waiter have mb()'s that pair with each other. However
__pollwait() is broken in this respect.
This is not pipe-specific, but let's look at pipe_poll() for example:
poll_wait(...); // -> __pollwait() -> add_wait_queue()
LOAD(pipe->head);
LOAD(pipe->head);
In theory these LOAD()'s can leak into the critical section inside
add_wait_queue() and can happen before list_add(entry, wq_head), in this
case pipe_poll() can race with wakeup_pipe_readers/writers which do
smp_mb();
if (waitqueue_active(wq_head))
wake_up_interruptible(wq_head);
There are more __pollwait()-like functions (grep init_poll_funcptr), and
it seems that at least ep_ptable_queue_proc() has the same problem, so the
patch adds smp_mb() into poll_wait().
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250102163320.GA17691@redhat.com/
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250107162717.GA18922@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/poll.h | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/poll.h b/include/linux/poll.h
index d1ea4f3714a8..fc641b50f129 100644
--- a/include/linux/poll.h
+++ b/include/linux/poll.h
@@ -41,8 +41,16 @@ typedef struct poll_table_struct {
static inline void poll_wait(struct file * filp, wait_queue_head_t * wait_address, poll_table *p)
{
- if (p && p->_qproc && wait_address)
+ if (p && p->_qproc && wait_address) {
p->_qproc(filp, wait_address, p);
+ /*
+ * This memory barrier is paired in the wq_has_sleeper().
+ * See the comment above prepare_to_wait(), we need to
+ * ensure that subsequent tests in this thread can't be
+ * reordered with __add_wait_queue() in _qproc() paths.
+ */
+ smp_mb();
+ }
}
/*
--
2.39.5
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-13 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-13 18:35 [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 01/10] mac802154: check local interfaces before deleting sdata list Sasha Levin
2025-01-13 18:35 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 02/10] hfs: Sanity check the root record Sasha Levin
2025-01-13 18:35 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 03/10] fs: fix missing declaration of init_files Sasha Levin
2025-01-13 18:35 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 04/10] kheaders: Ignore silly-rename files Sasha Levin
2025-01-13 18:35 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 05/10] cachefiles: Parse the "secctx" immediately Sasha Levin
2025-01-13 18:35 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 06/10] scsi: ufs: core: Honor runtime/system PM levels if set by host controller drivers Sasha Levin
2025-01-13 18:35 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 07/10] selftests: tc-testing: reduce rshift value Sasha Levin
2025-01-13 18:35 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 08/10] ACPI: resource: acpi_dev_irq_override(): Check DMI match last Sasha Levin
2025-01-13 18:35 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 09/10] iomap: avoid avoid truncating 64-bit offset to 32 bits Sasha Levin
2025-01-13 18:35 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250113183537.1784136-10-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox