From: Stefan Eichenberger <eichest@gmail.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu,
francesco.dolcini@toradex.com
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Stefan Eichenberger <stefan.eichenberger@toradex.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1] usb: core: fix pipe creation for get_bMaxPacketSize0
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 11:58:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250203105840.17539-1-eichest@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Stefan Eichenberger <stefan.eichenberger@toradex.com>
When usb_control_msg is used in the get_bMaxPacketSize0 function, the
USB pipe does not include the endpoint device number. This can cause
failures when a usb hub port is reinitialized after encountering a bad
cable connection. As a result, the system logs the following error
messages:
usb usb2-port1: cannot reset (err = -32)
usb usb2-port1: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB cable is bad?
usb usb2-port1: attempt power cycle
usb 2-1: new high-speed USB device number 5 using ci_hdrc
usb 2-1: device descriptor read/8, error -71
The problem began after commit 85d07c556216 ("USB: core: Unite old
scheme and new scheme descriptor reads"). There
usb_get_device_descriptor was replaced with get_bMaxPacketSize0. Unlike
usb_get_device_descriptor, the get_bMaxPacketSize0 function uses the
macro usb_rcvaddr0pipe, which does not include the endpoint device
number. usb_get_device_descriptor, on the other hand, used the macro
usb_rcvctrlpipe, which includes the endpoint device number.
By modifying the get_bMaxPacketSize0 function to use usb_rcvctrlpipe
instead of usb_rcvaddr0pipe, the issue can be resolved. This change will
ensure that the endpoint device number is included in the USB pipe,
preventing reinitialization failures. If the endpoint has not set the
device number yet, it will still work because the device number is 0 in
udev.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 85d07c556216 ("USB: core: Unite old scheme and new scheme descriptor reads")
Signed-off-by: Stefan Eichenberger <stefan.eichenberger@toradex.com>
---
Before commit 85d07c556216 ("USB: core: Unite old scheme and new scheme
descriptor reads") usb_rcvaddr0pipe was used in hub_port_init. With this
proposed change, usb_rcvctrlpipe will be used which includes devnum for
the pipe. I'm not sure if this might have some side effects. However, my
understanding is that devnum is set to the right value (might also be 0
if not initialised) before get_bMaxPacketSize0 is called. Therefore,
this should work but please let me know if I'm wrong on this.
---
drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
index c3f839637cb5..59e38780f76d 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
@@ -4698,7 +4698,6 @@ void usb_ep0_reinit(struct usb_device *udev)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_ep0_reinit);
#define usb_sndaddr0pipe() (PIPE_CONTROL << 30)
-#define usb_rcvaddr0pipe() ((PIPE_CONTROL << 30) | USB_DIR_IN)
static int hub_set_address(struct usb_device *udev, int devnum)
{
@@ -4804,7 +4803,7 @@ static int get_bMaxPacketSize0(struct usb_device *udev,
for (i = 0; i < GET_MAXPACKET0_TRIES; ++i) {
/* Start with invalid values in case the transfer fails */
buf->bDescriptorType = buf->bMaxPacketSize0 = 0;
- rc = usb_control_msg(udev, usb_rcvaddr0pipe(),
+ rc = usb_control_msg(udev, usb_rcvctrlpipe(udev, 0),
USB_REQ_GET_DESCRIPTOR, USB_DIR_IN,
USB_DT_DEVICE << 8, 0,
buf, size,
--
2.45.2
next reply other threads:[~2025-02-03 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-03 10:58 Stefan Eichenberger [this message]
2025-02-03 16:02 ` [PATCH v1] usb: core: fix pipe creation for get_bMaxPacketSize0 Alan Stern
2025-02-04 10:51 ` Stefan Eichenberger
2025-03-05 22:02 ` incansvl
2025-03-06 13:44 ` Alan Stern
[not found] ` <cf6c9693-49ae-4511-8f16-30168567f877@gmail.com>
2025-03-06 21:43 ` Alan Stern
2025-03-08 23:19 ` Colin Evans
2025-03-09 21:01 ` Alan Stern
2025-03-09 21:57 ` Colin Evans
2025-03-10 1:20 ` Alan Stern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250203105840.17539-1-eichest@gmail.com \
--to=eichest@gmail.com \
--cc=francesco.dolcini@toradex.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefan.eichenberger@toradex.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox