[PATCH 6.13 268/623] perf header: Fix one memory leakage in process_bpf_prog_info()

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

6.13-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Zhongqiu Han <quic_zhonhan@quicinc.com>

[ Upstream commit a7da6c7030e1aec32f0a41c7b4fa70ec96042019 ]

Function __perf_env__insert_bpf_prog_info() will return without inserting
bpf prog info node into perf env again due to a duplicate bpf prog info
node insertion, causing the temporary info_linear and info_node memory to
leak. Modify the return type of this function to bool and add a check to
ensure the memory is freed if the function returns false.

Fixes: 606f972b1361f477 ("perf bpf: Save bpf_prog_info information as headers to perf.data")
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Zhongqiu Han <quic_zhonhan@quicinc.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241205084500.823660-3-quic_zhonhan@quicinc.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 tools/perf/util/env.c    | 5 +++--
 tools/perf/util/env.h    | 2 +-
 tools/perf/util/header.c | 5 ++++-
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/env.c b/tools/perf/util/env.c
index e2843ca2edd92..d7865ae5f8f55 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/env.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/env.c
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ void perf_env__insert_bpf_prog_info(struct perf_env *env,
 	up_write(&env->bpf_progs.lock);
 }
 
-void __perf_env__insert_bpf_prog_info(struct perf_env *env, struct bpf_prog_info_node *info_node)
+bool __perf_env__insert_bpf_prog_info(struct perf_env *env, struct bpf_prog_info_node *info_node)
 {
 	__u32 prog_id = info_node->info_linear->info.id;
 	struct bpf_prog_info_node *node;
@@ -50,13 +50,14 @@ void __perf_env__insert_bpf_prog_info(struct perf_env *env, struct bpf_prog_info
 			p = &(*p)->rb_right;
 		} else {
 			pr_debug("duplicated bpf prog info %u\n", prog_id);
-			return;
+			return false;
 		}
 	}
 
 	rb_link_node(&info_node->rb_node, parent, p);
 	rb_insert_color(&info_node->rb_node, &env->bpf_progs.infos);
 	env->bpf_progs.infos_cnt++;
+	return true;
 }
 
 struct bpf_prog_info_node *perf_env__find_bpf_prog_info(struct perf_env *env,
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/env.h b/tools/perf/util/env.h
index ae604c4edbb7e..9db2e5a625ede 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/env.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/env.h
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ const char *perf_env__raw_arch(struct perf_env *env);
 int perf_env__nr_cpus_avail(struct perf_env *env);
 
 void perf_env__init(struct perf_env *env);
-void __perf_env__insert_bpf_prog_info(struct perf_env *env,
+bool __perf_env__insert_bpf_prog_info(struct perf_env *env,
 				      struct bpf_prog_info_node *info_node);
 void perf_env__insert_bpf_prog_info(struct perf_env *env,
 				    struct bpf_prog_info_node *info_node);
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/header.c b/tools/perf/util/header.c
index fbba6ffafec4a..d06aa86352d3c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/header.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/header.c
@@ -3158,7 +3158,10 @@ static int process_bpf_prog_info(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data __maybe_unused)
 		/* after reading from file, translate offset to address */
 		bpil_offs_to_addr(info_linear);
 		info_node->info_linear = info_linear;
-		__perf_env__insert_bpf_prog_info(env, info_node);
+		if (!__perf_env__insert_bpf_prog_info(env, info_node)) {
+			free(info_linear);
+			free(info_node);
+		}
 	}
 
 	up_write(&env->bpf_progs.lock);
-- 
2.39.5