From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: kan.liang@linux.intel.com,peterz@infradead.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Fix ARCH_PERFMON_NUM_COUNTER_LEAF" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 12:28:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025021817-pull-grievance-de31@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 47a973fd75639fe80d59f9e1860113bb2a0b112b
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025021817-pull-grievance-de31@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 47a973fd75639fe80d59f9e1860113bb2a0b112b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 07:48:19 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Fix ARCH_PERFMON_NUM_COUNTER_LEAF
The EAX of the CPUID Leaf 023H enumerates the mask of valid sub-leaves.
To tell the availability of the sub-leaf 1 (enumerate the counter mask),
perf should check the bit 1 (0x2) of EAS, rather than bit 0 (0x1).
The error is not user-visible on bare metal. Because the sub-leaf 0 and
the sub-leaf 1 are always available. However, it may bring issues in a
virtualization environment when a VMM only enumerates the sub-leaf 0.
Introduce the cpuid35_e?x to replace the macros, which makes the
implementation style consistent.
Fixes: eb467aaac21e ("perf/x86/intel: Support Architectural PerfMon Extension leaf")
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250129154820.3755948-3-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 966f7832497d..f3d5b718f93f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -4905,20 +4905,22 @@ static inline bool intel_pmu_broken_perf_cap(void)
static void update_pmu_cap(struct x86_hybrid_pmu *pmu)
{
- unsigned int sub_bitmaps, eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
+ unsigned int cntr, fixed_cntr, ecx, edx;
+ union cpuid35_eax eax;
+ union cpuid35_ebx ebx;
- cpuid(ARCH_PERFMON_EXT_LEAF, &sub_bitmaps, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
+ cpuid(ARCH_PERFMON_EXT_LEAF, &eax.full, &ebx.full, &ecx, &edx);
- if (ebx & ARCH_PERFMON_EXT_UMASK2)
+ if (ebx.split.umask2)
pmu->config_mask |= ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_UMASK2;
- if (ebx & ARCH_PERFMON_EXT_EQ)
+ if (ebx.split.eq)
pmu->config_mask |= ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EQ;
- if (sub_bitmaps & ARCH_PERFMON_NUM_COUNTER_LEAF_BIT) {
+ if (eax.split.cntr_subleaf) {
cpuid_count(ARCH_PERFMON_EXT_LEAF, ARCH_PERFMON_NUM_COUNTER_LEAF,
- &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
- pmu->cntr_mask64 = eax;
- pmu->fixed_cntr_mask64 = ebx;
+ &cntr, &fixed_cntr, &ecx, &edx);
+ pmu->cntr_mask64 = cntr;
+ pmu->fixed_cntr_mask64 = fixed_cntr;
}
if (!intel_pmu_broken_perf_cap()) {
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
index 1ac79f361645..0ba8d20f2d1d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -188,11 +188,33 @@ union cpuid10_edx {
* detection/enumeration details:
*/
#define ARCH_PERFMON_EXT_LEAF 0x00000023
-#define ARCH_PERFMON_EXT_UMASK2 0x1
-#define ARCH_PERFMON_EXT_EQ 0x2
-#define ARCH_PERFMON_NUM_COUNTER_LEAF_BIT 0x1
#define ARCH_PERFMON_NUM_COUNTER_LEAF 0x1
+union cpuid35_eax {
+ struct {
+ unsigned int leaf0:1;
+ /* Counters Sub-Leaf */
+ unsigned int cntr_subleaf:1;
+ /* Auto Counter Reload Sub-Leaf */
+ unsigned int acr_subleaf:1;
+ /* Events Sub-Leaf */
+ unsigned int events_subleaf:1;
+ unsigned int reserved:28;
+ } split;
+ unsigned int full;
+};
+
+union cpuid35_ebx {
+ struct {
+ /* UnitMask2 Supported */
+ unsigned int umask2:1;
+ /* EQ-bit Supported */
+ unsigned int eq:1;
+ unsigned int reserved:30;
+ } split;
+ unsigned int full;
+};
+
/*
* Intel Architectural LBR CPUID detection/enumeration details:
*/
next reply other threads:[~2025-02-18 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-18 11:28 gregkh [this message]
2025-02-20 16:31 ` [PATCH 6.6.y] perf/x86/intel: Fix ARCH_PERFMON_NUM_COUNTER_LEAF Kan Liang
2025-02-20 16:37 ` Greg KH
2025-02-20 17:52 ` Sasha Levin
2025-02-20 20:17 ` Kan Liang
2025-02-22 15:53 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025021817-pull-grievance-de31@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox