From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: fdmanana@suse.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: fix hole expansion when writing at an offset beyond" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:35:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025021859-obligate-simile-7eaf@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x da2dccd7451de62b175fb8f0808d644959e964c7
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025021859-obligate-simile-7eaf@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From da2dccd7451de62b175fb8f0808d644959e964c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:36:48 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fix hole expansion when writing at an offset beyond
EOF
At btrfs_write_check() if our file's i_size is not sector size aligned and
we have a write that starts at an offset larger than the i_size that falls
within the same page of the i_size, then we end up not zeroing the file
range [i_size, write_offset).
The code is this:
start_pos = round_down(pos, fs_info->sectorsize);
oldsize = i_size_read(inode);
if (start_pos > oldsize) {
/* Expand hole size to cover write data, preventing empty gap */
loff_t end_pos = round_up(pos + count, fs_info->sectorsize);
ret = btrfs_cont_expand(BTRFS_I(inode), oldsize, end_pos);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
So if our file's i_size is 90269 bytes and a write at offset 90365 bytes
comes in, we get 'start_pos' set to 90112 bytes, which is less than the
i_size and therefore we don't zero out the range [90269, 90365) by
calling btrfs_cont_expand().
This is an old bug introduced in commit 9036c10208e1 ("Btrfs: update hole
handling v2"), from 2008, and the buggy code got moved around over the
years.
Fix this by discarding 'start_pos' and comparing against the write offset
('pos') without any alignment.
This bug was recently exposed by test case generic/363 which tests this
scenario by polluting ranges beyond EOF with an mmap write and than verify
that after a file increases we get zeroes for the range which is supposed
to be a hole and not what we wrote with the previous mmaped write.
We're only seeing this exposed now because generic/363 used to run only
on xfs until last Sunday's fstests update.
The test was failing like this:
$ ./check generic/363
FSTYP -- btrfs
PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 debian0 6.13.0-rc7-btrfs-next-185+ #17 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Feb 3 12:28:46 WET 2025
MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdc
MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdc /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1
generic/363 0s ... [failed, exit status 1]- output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/363.out.bad)
--- tests/generic/363.out 2025-02-05 15:31:14.013646509 +0000
+++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/363.out.bad 2025-02-05 17:25:33.112630781 +0000
@@ -1 +1,46 @@
QA output created by 363
+READ BAD DATA: offset = 0xdcad, size = 0xd921, fname = /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/dev/junk
+OFFSET GOOD BAD RANGE
+0x1609d 0x0000 0x3104 0x0
+operation# (mod 256) for the bad data may be 4
+0x1609e 0x0000 0x0472 0x1
+operation# (mod 256) for the bad data may be 4
...
(Run 'diff -u /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/tests/generic/363.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/363.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
Ran: generic/363
Failures: generic/363
Failed 1 of 1 tests
Fixes: 9036c10208e1 ("Btrfs: update hole handling v2")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
index 36f51c311bb1..ed3c0d6546c5 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@ -1039,7 +1039,6 @@ int btrfs_write_check(struct kiocb *iocb, size_t count)
loff_t pos = iocb->ki_pos;
int ret;
loff_t oldsize;
- loff_t start_pos;
/*
* Quickly bail out on NOWAIT writes if we don't have the nodatacow or
@@ -1066,9 +1065,8 @@ int btrfs_write_check(struct kiocb *iocb, size_t count)
inode_inc_iversion(inode);
}
- start_pos = round_down(pos, fs_info->sectorsize);
oldsize = i_size_read(inode);
- if (start_pos > oldsize) {
+ if (pos > oldsize) {
/* Expand hole size to cover write data, preventing empty gap */
loff_t end_pos = round_up(pos + count, fs_info->sectorsize);
reply other threads:[~2025-02-18 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025021859-obligate-simile-7eaf@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox