public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.6.y] perf/x86/intel: Fix ARCH_PERFMON_NUM_COUNTER_LEAF
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 08:31:46 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250220163146.3030320-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2025021817-pull-grievance-de31@gregkh>

The EAX of the CPUID Leaf 023H enumerates the mask of valid sub-leaves.
To tell the availability of the sub-leaf 1 (enumerate the counter mask),
perf should check the bit 1 (0x2) of EAS, rather than bit 0 (0x1).

The error is not user-visible on bare metal. Because the sub-leaf 0 and
the sub-leaf 1 are always available. However, it may bring issues in a
virtualization environment when a VMM only enumerates the sub-leaf 0.

Introduce the cpuid35_e?x to replace the macros, which makes the
implementation style consistent.

Fixes: eb467aaac21e ("perf/x86/intel: Support Architectural PerfMon Extension leaf")
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250129154820.3755948-3-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c      | 17 ++++++++++-------
 arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 37c8badd2701..52f2ca214617 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -4643,16 +4643,19 @@ static void intel_pmu_check_num_counters(int *num_counters,
 
 static void update_pmu_cap(struct x86_hybrid_pmu *pmu)
 {
-	unsigned int sub_bitmaps = cpuid_eax(ARCH_PERFMON_EXT_LEAF);
-	unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
+	unsigned int cntr, fixed_cntr, ecx, edx;
+	union cpuid35_eax eax;
+	union cpuid35_ebx ebx;
 
-	if (sub_bitmaps & ARCH_PERFMON_NUM_COUNTER_LEAF_BIT) {
+	cpuid(ARCH_PERFMON_EXT_LEAF, &eax.full, &ebx.full, &ecx, &edx);
+
+	if (eax.split.cntr_subleaf) {
 		cpuid_count(ARCH_PERFMON_EXT_LEAF, ARCH_PERFMON_NUM_COUNTER_LEAF,
-			    &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
-		pmu->num_counters = fls(eax);
-		pmu->num_counters_fixed = fls(ebx);
+			    &cntr, &fixed_cntr, &ecx, &edx);
+		pmu->num_counters = fls(cntr);
+		pmu->num_counters_fixed = fls(fixed_cntr);
 		intel_pmu_check_num_counters(&pmu->num_counters, &pmu->num_counters_fixed,
-					     &pmu->intel_ctrl, ebx);
+					     &pmu->intel_ctrl, fixed_cntr);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
index 85a9fd5a3ec3..384e8a7db482 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -177,9 +177,33 @@ union cpuid10_edx {
  * detection/enumeration details:
  */
 #define ARCH_PERFMON_EXT_LEAF			0x00000023
-#define ARCH_PERFMON_NUM_COUNTER_LEAF_BIT	0x1
 #define ARCH_PERFMON_NUM_COUNTER_LEAF		0x1
 
+union cpuid35_eax {
+	struct {
+		unsigned int	leaf0:1;
+		/* Counters Sub-Leaf */
+		unsigned int    cntr_subleaf:1;
+		/* Auto Counter Reload Sub-Leaf */
+		unsigned int    acr_subleaf:1;
+		/* Events Sub-Leaf */
+		unsigned int    events_subleaf:1;
+		unsigned int	reserved:28;
+	} split;
+	unsigned int            full;
+};
+
+union cpuid35_ebx {
+	struct {
+		/* UnitMask2 Supported */
+		unsigned int    umask2:1;
+		/* EQ-bit Supported */
+		unsigned int    eq:1;
+		unsigned int	reserved:30;
+	} split;
+	unsigned int            full;
+};
+
 /*
  * Intel Architectural LBR CPUID detection/enumeration details:
  */
-- 
2.38.1


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-20 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-18 11:28 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Fix ARCH_PERFMON_NUM_COUNTER_LEAF" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree gregkh
2025-02-20 16:31 ` Kan Liang [this message]
2025-02-20 16:37   ` [PATCH 6.6.y] perf/x86/intel: Fix ARCH_PERFMON_NUM_COUNTER_LEAF Greg KH
2025-02-20 17:52   ` Sasha Levin
2025-02-20 20:17 ` Kan Liang
2025-02-22 15:53   ` Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250220163146.3030320-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox