Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jianqi.ren.cn@windriver.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
	kvalo@kernel.org, rand.sec96@gmail.com, m@bues.ch,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	zhe.he@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] ssb: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in ssb_device_uevent()
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:54:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025022412-unlikable-aftermost-bc2a@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250224083707.2532381-1-jianqi.ren.cn@windriver.com>

On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 04:37:07PM +0800, jianqi.ren.cn@windriver.com wrote:
> From: Rand Deeb <rand.sec96@gmail.com>
> 
> [ Upstream commit 789c17185fb0f39560496c2beab9b57ce1d0cbe7 ]
> 
> The ssb_device_uevent() function first attempts to convert the 'dev' pointer
> to 'struct ssb_device *'. However, it mistakenly dereferences 'dev' before
> performing the NULL check, potentially leading to a NULL pointer
> dereference if 'dev' is NULL.
> 
> To fix this issue, move the NULL check before dereferencing the 'dev' pointer,
> ensuring that the pointer is valid before attempting to use it.
> 
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rand Deeb <rand.sec96@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
> Link: https://msgid.link/20240306123028.164155-1-rand.sec96@gmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Jianqi Ren <jianqi.ren.cn@windriver.com>
> Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe.he@windriver.com>
> ---
> Verified the build test.
> ---
>  drivers/ssb/main.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ssb/main.c b/drivers/ssb/main.c
> index d52e91258e98..aae50a5dfb57 100644
> --- a/drivers/ssb/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/ssb/main.c
> @@ -341,11 +341,13 @@ static int ssb_bus_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
>  
>  static int ssb_device_uevent(struct device *dev, struct kobj_uevent_env *env)
>  {
> -	struct ssb_device *ssb_dev = dev_to_ssb_dev(dev);
> +	struct ssb_device *ssb_dev;
>  
>  	if (!dev)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> +	ssb_dev = dev_to_ssb_dev(dev);

This patch does nothing, sorry.  It's impossible for dev to be null so
no need to verify this and I guess I'll go reject the cve that was
assigned to it as well as it's pointless.

thanks,

greg k-h

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-24 12:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-24  8:37 [PATCH 6.1.y] ssb: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in ssb_device_uevent() jianqi.ren.cn
2025-02-24 12:38 ` Sasha Levin
2025-02-24 12:54 ` Greg KH [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-01-23  8:35 Imkanmod Khan
2025-01-23 20:57 ` Sasha Levin
2024-12-11 10:15 jianqi.ren.cn
2024-12-11 16:32 ` Sasha Levin
2024-12-11  9:58 jianqi.ren.cn
2024-12-11 16:32 ` Sasha Levin
2024-12-09  6:33 jianqi.ren.cn
2024-12-09 14:35 ` Sasha Levin
2024-12-06  9:32 jianqi.ren.cn
2024-12-06 17:11 ` Sasha Levin
2024-12-11  8:15 ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2025022412-unlikable-aftermost-bc2a@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jianqi.ren.cn@windriver.com \
    --cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m@bues.ch \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rand.sec96@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zhe.he@windriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox