public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sean.wang@kernel.org
To: nbd@nbd.name, lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com
Cc: sean.wang@mediatek.com, deren.wu@mediatek.com,
	mingyen.hsieh@mediatek.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/6] wifi: mt76: mt7925: adjust rm BSS flow to prevent next connection failure
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 16:35:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250226003556.82644-4-sean.wang@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250226003556.82644-1-sean.wang@kernel.org>

From: Ming Yen Hsieh <mingyen.hsieh@mediatek.com>

Removing BSS without removing STAREC first will cause firmware
abnormal and next connection fail.

Fixes: f8797298565e ("wifi: mt76: mt7925: Cleanup MLO settings post-disconnection")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ming Yen Hsieh <mingyen.hsieh@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
---
v2, v3: generate the patch based on the latest mt76 tree
---
 .../net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/main.c  | 45 +++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/main.c
index 604f771af68e..4a9f393b45ba 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/main.c
@@ -1155,7 +1155,12 @@ static void mt7925_mac_link_sta_remove(struct mt76_dev *mdev,
 		struct mt792x_bss_conf *mconf;
 
 		mconf = mt792x_link_conf_to_mconf(link_conf);
-		mt792x_mac_link_bss_remove(dev, mconf, mlink);
+
+		if (ieee80211_vif_is_mld(vif))
+			mt792x_mac_link_bss_remove(dev, mconf, mlink);
+		else
+			mt7925_mcu_add_bss_info(&dev->phy, mconf->mt76.ctx, link_conf,
+						link_sta, false);
 	}
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&mdev->sta_poll_lock);
@@ -1175,6 +1180,31 @@ mt7925_mac_sta_remove_links(struct mt792x_dev *dev, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
 	struct mt76_wcid *wcid;
 	unsigned int link_id;
 
+	/* clean up bss before starec */
+	for_each_set_bit(link_id, &old_links, IEEE80211_MLD_MAX_NUM_LINKS) {
+		struct ieee80211_link_sta *link_sta;
+		struct ieee80211_bss_conf *link_conf;
+		struct mt792x_bss_conf *mconf;
+		struct mt792x_link_sta *mlink;
+
+		link_sta = mt792x_sta_to_link_sta(vif, sta, link_id);
+		if (!link_sta)
+			continue;
+
+		mlink = mt792x_sta_to_link(msta, link_id);
+		if (!mlink)
+			continue;
+
+		link_conf = mt792x_vif_to_bss_conf(vif, link_id);
+		if (!link_conf)
+			continue;
+
+		mconf = mt792x_link_conf_to_mconf(link_conf);
+
+		mt7925_mcu_add_bss_info(&dev->phy, mconf->mt76.ctx, link_conf,
+					link_sta, false);
+	}
+
 	for_each_set_bit(link_id, &old_links, IEEE80211_MLD_MAX_NUM_LINKS) {
 		struct ieee80211_link_sta *link_sta;
 		struct mt792x_link_sta *mlink;
@@ -1212,6 +1242,7 @@ void mt7925_mac_sta_remove(struct mt76_dev *mdev, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
 {
 	struct mt792x_dev *dev = container_of(mdev, struct mt792x_dev, mt76);
 	struct mt792x_sta *msta = (struct mt792x_sta *)sta->drv_priv;
+	struct mt792x_vif *mvif = (struct mt792x_vif *)vif->drv_priv;
 	struct {
 		struct {
 			u8 omac_idx;
@@ -1242,14 +1273,10 @@ void mt7925_mac_sta_remove(struct mt76_dev *mdev, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
 
 	mt7925_mac_sta_remove_links(dev, vif, sta, rem);
 
-	if (ieee80211_vif_is_mld(vif)) {
-		mt7925_mcu_set_dbdc(&dev->mphy, false);
-
-		/* recovery omac address for the legacy interface */
-		memcpy(dev_req.tlv.omac_addr, vif->addr, ETH_ALEN);
-		mt76_mcu_send_msg(mdev, MCU_UNI_CMD(DEV_INFO_UPDATE),
-				  &dev_req, sizeof(dev_req), true);
-	}
+	/* recovery omac address for the legacy interface */
+	memcpy(dev_req.tlv.omac_addr, vif->addr, ETH_ALEN);
+	mt76_mcu_send_msg(mdev, MCU_UNI_CMD(DEV_INFO_UPDATE),
+			  &dev_req, sizeof(dev_req), true);
 
 	if (vif->type == NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION) {
 		struct mt792x_vif *mvif = (struct mt792x_vif *)vif->drv_priv;
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-26  0:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-26  0:35 [PATCH v3 1/6] Revert "wifi: mt76: mt7925: Update mt7925_mcu_uni_[tx,rx]_ba for MLO" sean.wang
2025-02-26  0:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] wifi: mt76: mt7925: fix the wrong link_idx when has p2p_device sean.wang
2025-02-26  2:30   ` Ping-Ke Shih
2025-02-26  0:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] wifi: mt76: mt7925: fix the wrong simultaneous cap for MLO sean.wang
2025-02-26  0:35 ` sean.wang [this message]
2025-02-26  0:35 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] wifi: mt76: mt7925: integrate *mlo_sta_cmd and *sta_cmd sean.wang
2025-02-26  0:35 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] wifi: mt76: mt7925: update the power-saving flow sean.wang
2025-02-26  2:25 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] Revert "wifi: mt76: mt7925: Update mt7925_mcu_uni_[tx,rx]_ba for MLO" Ping-Ke Shih

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250226003556.82644-4-sean.wang@kernel.org \
    --to=sean.wang@kernel.org \
    --cc=deren.wu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingyen.hsieh@mediatek.com \
    --cc=nbd@nbd.name \
    --cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox