From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A591148FF5; Thu, 6 Mar 2025 15:42:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741275737; cv=none; b=VLGiuow+Q7nOWPavFct3QnhSjUHPwuiqZ7R8kaP4pMi9p5RH0T2wuN/yUblU0eLbcfld/YfVzOAnlXaA4oPWoeoUlUOPiD74LBgGhwMisIddnOVO82aKS+0xGCx2IayaVgMjVnBzuKzFJ7YN1NdCm+jxby9hKfMw02vBKdChO3A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741275737; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UUBhF9NhePQ1mVan/otMRee77cWY/IkkhCCKPaz9a6w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=iI+osrOT86KsIIrrCIlRGp/hHvvMfT21RZKoxkRzAeWUirFxWPj8614xHoNiDdQSInxR0AFMk5xUOS1hh4jpfmlVtTCO+ljfv1A98yznSJht1sBqjwJ1DbD1TNWLyIZQsgue3MUbofi6gkX0rRDynddshiMggW53LiLtGINS39A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=uZd+fYIo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="uZd+fYIo" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0CCF9C4CEE0; Thu, 6 Mar 2025 15:42:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1741275736; bh=UUBhF9NhePQ1mVan/otMRee77cWY/IkkhCCKPaz9a6w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=uZd+fYIofyzzEfe4sEkk3nTv0MWNzWuQxkEVVw7iOMsV7aJcR1VcDOIJ4Y5YXNg3L FOf6WQ5J2T3TG41C3VZUA4/c2VcR1+2Nvryz3j7fqjdDuuCbofbPVZWCwa/BNaK2te 1HLchGAcCyZXprZUN6/IFBdYz9P3XzEES57NVJYw= Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 16:42:13 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Mathias Nyman Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Michal Pecio , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] usb: xhci: Don't skip on Stopped - Length Invalid Message-ID: <2025030650-defiling-grit-869e@gregkh> References: <20250306144954.3507700-1-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> <20250306144954.3507700-4-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> <2025030611-twister-synapse-8a99@gregkh> <22876af7-4f9a-40ce-aa9d-2bcab89ce8ae@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <22876af7-4f9a-40ce-aa9d-2bcab89ce8ae@linux.intel.com> On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 05:29:30PM +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote: > On 6.3.2025 16.52, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 04:49:42PM +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote: > > Why is a patch cc: stable burried here in a series for linux-next? It > > will be many many weeks before it gets out to anyone else, is that > > intentional? > > > > Same for the other commit in this series tagged that way. > > These are both kind of half theoretical issues that have been > around for years without more complaints. No need to rush them to > stable. Balance between regression risk vs adding them to stable. > > This patch for example states: > > "I had no luck producing this sequence of completion events so there > is no compelling demonstration of any resulting disaster. It may be > a very rare, obscure condition. The sole motivation for this patch > is that if such unlikely event does occur, I'd rather risk reporting > a cancelled partially done isoc frame as empty than gamble with UA" Ok, fair enough, just seeing patches languish in -next that are tagged for stable looks odd. thanks, greg k-h