From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDE5025BABF; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 15:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741707228; cv=none; b=szOoJLcp7vdCFMNN/fx3o0HsFGE9b09y7LBdMixMefmvNwXwMe2BM5C0glaw6biglsYXTJr6FBvq2S6YqyNBof6rW1qc54kbCSvGTVNExAUR6sqC9Tmvq1Qf6Gx/fRI3dDKz9DDA6RHOv8JOe9o+gXYRoa6Mv3cR6o1dfsapFUw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741707228; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rv9Zk//qxYSdgSdJkwWD/9XRamiY9eUIhZklS3VnK60=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=CRRVDLfZdTXQ4JFNiTYrL0ofPqCtTJUpcRVjuK6F0rhtWQHXbsYLDiT9p0k+q3u5C1J3CU2rieLFdCBJdfBuAGNA8KF8q+2H9t/KR+jcS6lWnAuD1DY0BJWCZdGX75ToNwvHtv41MNUeevTbmNMDfYMzBrWtDC2ojf4AyNbIFvs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=LKt2oEz1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="LKt2oEz1" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7389CC4CEE9; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 15:33:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1741707227; bh=rv9Zk//qxYSdgSdJkwWD/9XRamiY9eUIhZklS3VnK60=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LKt2oEz1gvD3M/N3038iXWucuhBzD8UWFy9MoZqsMRIJwHzV0f1nxg7zJjX9eyvPa hYGs5VCyd3h7kJryo5cLUq6NZDB1m/OwHbAPhfb5gTUTpiF/Fo82e2CrUq1YHXRnQj mb7bXLlMryr3Lkdnr//9aP56HcQeYd5IMUMnmT7g= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Waiman Long , Thomas Gleixner , "Paul E. McKenney" , John Stultz , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.10 277/462] clocksource: Use pr_info() for "Checking clocksource synchronization" message Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 15:59:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20250311145809.308322069@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.48.1 In-Reply-To: <20250311145758.343076290@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20250311145758.343076290@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.68 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Waiman Long [ Upstream commit 1f566840a82982141f94086061927a90e79440e5 ] The "Checking clocksource synchronization" message is normally printed when clocksource_verify_percpu() is called for a given clocksource if both the CLOCK_SOURCE_UNSTABLE and CLOCK_SOURCE_VERIFY_PERCPU flags are set. It is an informational message and so pr_info() is the correct choice. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney Acked-by: John Stultz Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250125015442.3740588-1-longman@redhat.com Stable-dep-of: 6bb05a33337b ("clocksource: Use migrate_disable() to avoid calling get_random_u32() in atomic context") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- kernel/time/clocksource.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c index 658b90755dd72..21dfee6c0d936 100644 --- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c +++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c @@ -345,7 +345,8 @@ static void clocksource_verify_percpu(struct clocksource *cs) return; } testcpu = smp_processor_id(); - pr_warn("Checking clocksource %s synchronization from CPU %d to CPUs %*pbl.\n", cs->name, testcpu, cpumask_pr_args(&cpus_chosen)); + pr_info("Checking clocksource %s synchronization from CPU %d to CPUs %*pbl.\n", + cs->name, testcpu, cpumask_pr_args(&cpus_chosen)); for_each_cpu(cpu, &cpus_chosen) { if (cpu == testcpu) continue; -- 2.39.5