From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Fangrui Song <i@maskray.me>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 19:10:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250311181056.GF3493@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250311174626.GHZ9B28rDrfWKJthsN@fat_crate.local>
On 03/11, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 03:37:25PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > sorry for the off-topic noise, but what about the
> >
> > [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241206123207.GA2091@redhat.com/
> >
> > fix for the older binutils? It was acked by Ard.
> >
> > Should I resend it?
>
> Can you pls explain how you trigger this?
>
> I just did a
>
> # CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR is not set
>
> build here and it was fine.
>
> So there's something else I'm missing.
See the "older binutils?" above ;)
my toolchain is quite old,
$ ld -v
GNU ld version 2.25-17.fc23
but according to Documentation/process/changes.rst
binutils 2.25 ld -v
it should be still supported.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-11 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20241105155801.1779119-1-brgerst@gmail.com>
2024-11-05 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 01/16] x86/stackprotector: Work around strict Clang TLS symbol requirements Brian Gerst
2024-11-05 19:30 ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-11-08 14:43 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Ard Biesheuvel
2024-12-06 11:51 ` [PATCH v5 01/16] " Oleg Nesterov
2024-12-06 14:09 ` Brian Gerst
2024-12-06 14:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-12-06 12:32 ` [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n Oleg Nesterov
2024-12-06 13:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-12-06 14:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-12-06 14:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-12-06 15:12 ` Brian Gerst
2024-12-06 15:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-03-10 21:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-10 22:19 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-03-11 10:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-11 10:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-03-11 11:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-11 13:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-11 14:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-11 17:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-11 18:10 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2025-03-11 19:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-11 19:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-11 21:27 ` Brian Gerst
2025-03-11 21:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-11 21:47 ` Brian Gerst
2025-03-12 9:28 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250311181056.GF3493@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=i@maskray.me \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox