* [PATCH RESEND] ext4: Fix potential NULL pointer dereferences in test_mb_mark_used() and test_mb_free_blocks()
@ 2025-03-13 0:00 Qasim Ijaz
2025-03-17 19:05 ` Tim Chen
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Qasim Ijaz @ 2025-03-13 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: adilger.kernel, tytso, shikemeng; +Cc: linux-ext4, linux-kernel, stable
test_mb_mark_used() and test_mb_free_blocks() call kunit_kzalloc() to
allocate memory, however both fail to ensure that the allocations
succeeded. If kunit_kzalloc() returns NULL, then dereferencing the
corresponding pointer without checking for NULL will lead to
a NULL pointer dereference.
To fix this call KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL() to ensure
the allocation succeeded.
Fixes: ac96b56a2fbd ("ext4: Add unit test for mb_mark_used")
Fixes: b7098e1fa7bc ("ext4: Add unit test for mb_free_blocks")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@gmail.com>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
index bb2a223b207c..d634c12f1984 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
@@ -796,6 +796,7 @@ static void test_mb_mark_used(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buddy);
grp = kunit_kzalloc(test, offsetof(struct ext4_group_info,
bb_counters[MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb)]), GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, grp);
ret = ext4_mb_load_buddy(sb, TEST_GOAL_GROUP, &e4b);
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
@@ -860,6 +861,7 @@ static void test_mb_free_blocks(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buddy);
grp = kunit_kzalloc(test, offsetof(struct ext4_group_info,
bb_counters[MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb)]), GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, grp);
ret = ext4_mb_load_buddy(sb, TEST_GOAL_GROUP, &e4b);
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
--
2.39.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RESEND] ext4: Fix potential NULL pointer dereferences in test_mb_mark_used() and test_mb_free_blocks()
2025-03-13 0:00 [PATCH RESEND] ext4: Fix potential NULL pointer dereferences in test_mb_mark_used() and test_mb_free_blocks() Qasim Ijaz
@ 2025-03-17 19:05 ` Tim Chen
2025-03-18 1:30 ` Kemeng Shi
2025-03-21 5:03 ` Theodore Ts'o
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tim Chen @ 2025-03-17 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Qasim Ijaz, adilger.kernel, tytso, shikemeng
Cc: linux-ext4, linux-kernel, stable
On Thu, 2025-03-13 at 00:00 +0000, Qasim Ijaz wrote:
> test_mb_mark_used() and test_mb_free_blocks() call kunit_kzalloc() to
> allocate memory, however both fail to ensure that the allocations
> succeeded. If kunit_kzalloc() returns NULL, then dereferencing the
> corresponding pointer without checking for NULL will lead to
> a NULL pointer dereference.
>
> To fix this call KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL() to ensure
> the allocation succeeded.
>
Reviewed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
> Fixes: ac96b56a2fbd ("ext4: Add unit test for mb_mark_used")
> Fixes: b7098e1fa7bc ("ext4: Add unit test for mb_free_blocks")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
> index bb2a223b207c..d634c12f1984 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
> @@ -796,6 +796,7 @@ static void test_mb_mark_used(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buddy);
> grp = kunit_kzalloc(test, offsetof(struct ext4_group_info,
> bb_counters[MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb)]), GFP_KERNEL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, grp);
>
> ret = ext4_mb_load_buddy(sb, TEST_GOAL_GROUP, &e4b);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> @@ -860,6 +861,7 @@ static void test_mb_free_blocks(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buddy);
> grp = kunit_kzalloc(test, offsetof(struct ext4_group_info,
> bb_counters[MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb)]), GFP_KERNEL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, grp);
>
> ret = ext4_mb_load_buddy(sb, TEST_GOAL_GROUP, &e4b);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RESEND] ext4: Fix potential NULL pointer dereferences in test_mb_mark_used() and test_mb_free_blocks()
2025-03-13 0:00 [PATCH RESEND] ext4: Fix potential NULL pointer dereferences in test_mb_mark_used() and test_mb_free_blocks() Qasim Ijaz
2025-03-17 19:05 ` Tim Chen
@ 2025-03-18 1:30 ` Kemeng Shi
2025-03-21 5:03 ` Theodore Ts'o
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kemeng Shi @ 2025-03-18 1:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Qasim Ijaz, adilger.kernel, tytso; +Cc: linux-ext4, linux-kernel, stable
on 3/13/2025 8:00 AM, Qasim Ijaz wrote:
> test_mb_mark_used() and test_mb_free_blocks() call kunit_kzalloc() to
> allocate memory, however both fail to ensure that the allocations
> succeeded. If kunit_kzalloc() returns NULL, then dereferencing the
> corresponding pointer without checking for NULL will lead to
> a NULL pointer dereference.
>
> To fix this call KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL() to ensure
> the allocation succeeded.
Reviewed-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
>
> Fixes: ac96b56a2fbd ("ext4: Add unit test for mb_mark_used")
> Fixes: b7098e1fa7bc ("ext4: Add unit test for mb_free_blocks")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
> index bb2a223b207c..d634c12f1984 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
> @@ -796,6 +796,7 @@ static void test_mb_mark_used(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buddy);
> grp = kunit_kzalloc(test, offsetof(struct ext4_group_info,
> bb_counters[MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb)]), GFP_KERNEL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, grp);
>
> ret = ext4_mb_load_buddy(sb, TEST_GOAL_GROUP, &e4b);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> @@ -860,6 +861,7 @@ static void test_mb_free_blocks(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buddy);
> grp = kunit_kzalloc(test, offsetof(struct ext4_group_info,
> bb_counters[MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb)]), GFP_KERNEL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, grp);
>
> ret = ext4_mb_load_buddy(sb, TEST_GOAL_GROUP, &e4b);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RESEND] ext4: Fix potential NULL pointer dereferences in test_mb_mark_used() and test_mb_free_blocks()
2025-03-13 0:00 [PATCH RESEND] ext4: Fix potential NULL pointer dereferences in test_mb_mark_used() and test_mb_free_blocks() Qasim Ijaz
2025-03-17 19:05 ` Tim Chen
2025-03-18 1:30 ` Kemeng Shi
@ 2025-03-21 5:03 ` Theodore Ts'o
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Theodore Ts'o @ 2025-03-21 5:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Qasim Ijaz; +Cc: adilger.kernel, shikemeng, linux-ext4, linux-kernel, stable
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 12:00:21AM +0000, Qasim Ijaz wrote:
> test_mb_mark_used() and test_mb_free_blocks() call kunit_kzalloc() to
> allocate memory, however both fail to ensure that the allocations
> succeeded. If kunit_kzalloc() returns NULL, then dereferencing the
> corresponding pointer without checking for NULL will lead to
> a NULL pointer dereference.
>
> To fix this call KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL() to ensure
> the allocation succeeded.
Thanks; other folks have sent this fix.
- Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-03-21 5:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-03-13 0:00 [PATCH RESEND] ext4: Fix potential NULL pointer dereferences in test_mb_mark_used() and test_mb_free_blocks() Qasim Ijaz
2025-03-17 19:05 ` Tim Chen
2025-03-18 1:30 ` Kemeng Shi
2025-03-21 5:03 ` Theodore Ts'o
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox