From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Josh Drake <josh@delphoslabs.com>,
Suraj Sonawane <surajsonawane0215@gmail.com>,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
security@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] keys: Fix UAF in key_put()
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 12:22:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250318112245.GA14792@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2477454.1742292885@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
On 03/18, David Howells wrote:
>
> --- a/security/keys/key.c
> +++ b/security/keys/key.c
> @@ -645,21 +645,30 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(key_reject_and_link);
> */
> void key_put(struct key *key)
> {
> + int quota_flag;
> + unsigned short len;
> + struct key_user *user;
> +
> if (key) {
> key_check(key);
>
> + quota_flag = test_bit(KEY_FLAG_IN_QUOTA, &key->flags);
> + len = key->quotalen;
> + user = key->user;
> + refcount_inc(&user->usage);
> if (refcount_dec_and_test(&key->usage)) {
> unsigned long flags;
>
> /* deal with the user's key tracking and quota */
> - if (test_bit(KEY_FLAG_IN_QUOTA, &key->flags)) {
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&key->user->lock, flags);
> - key->user->qnkeys--;
> - key->user->qnbytes -= key->quotalen;
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&key->user->lock, flags);
> + if (quota_flag) {
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&user->lock, flags);
> + user->qnkeys--;
> + user->qnbytes -= len;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&user->lock, flags);
> }
> schedule_work(&key_gc_work);
> }
> + key_user_put(user);
Do we really need the unconditional refcount_inc / key_user_put ?
void key_put(struct key *key)
{
if (key) {
struct key_user *user = NULL;
unsigned short len;
key_check(key);
if (test_bit(KEY_FLAG_IN_QUOTA, &key->flags)) {
len = key->quotalen;
user = key->user;
refcount_inc(&user->usage);
}
if (refcount_dec_and_test(&key->usage)) {
unsigned long flags;
/* deal with the user's key tracking and quota */
if (user) {
spin_lock_irqsave(&user->lock, flags);
user->qnkeys--;
user->qnbytes -= len;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&user->lock, flags);
}
schedule_work(&key_gc_work);
}
if (user)
key_user_put(user);
}
}
looks a bit more clear/simple to me...
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-18 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-18 10:14 [PATCH] keys: Fix UAF in key_put() David Howells
2025-03-18 11:22 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2025-03-18 11:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-18 13:27 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250318112245.GA14792@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=josh@delphoslabs.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surajsonawane0215@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox