public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12 v2 3/8] KVM: arm64: Remove host FPSIMD saving for non-protected KVM
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 13:26:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250321110532-03d8d336d445d068@stable.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250321-stable-sve-6-12-v2-3-417ca2278d18@kernel.org>

[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]

Hi,

Summary of potential issues:
ℹ️ This is part 3/8 of a series
⚠️ Found matching upstream commit but patch is missing proper reference to it

Found matching upstream commit: 8eca7f6d5100b6997df4f532090bc3f7e0203bef

WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and found commit:
Backport author: Mark Brown<broonie@kernel.org>
Commit author: Mark Rutland<mark.rutland@arm.com>

Status in newer kernel trees:
6.13.y | Present (different SHA1: b52b812b3867)

Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit:
---
1:  8eca7f6d5100b ! 1:  af977c6789959 KVM: arm64: Remove host FPSIMD saving for non-protected KVM
    @@ Commit message
         Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
         Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250210195226.1215254-3-mark.rutland@arm.com
         Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
    +    Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
     
      ## arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h ##
     @@ arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h: struct kvm_host_data {
    @@ arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c: void kvm_arch_vcpu_load_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
     -	*host_data_ptr(fpsimd_state) = NULL;
     -	*host_data_ptr(fpmr_ptr) = NULL;
      
    - 	host_data_clear_flag(HOST_SVE_ENABLED);
    + 	vcpu_clear_flag(vcpu, HOST_SVE_ENABLED);
      	if (read_sysreg(cpacr_el1) & CPACR_EL1_ZEN_EL0EN)
     
      ## arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h ##
    @@ arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h: static inline void __hyp_sve_save_host(
     +
     +		/* Re-enable SVE traps if not supported for the guest vcpu. */
     +		if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
    -+			cpacr_clear_set(CPACR_EL1_ZEN, 0);
    ++			cpacr_clear_set(CPACR_ELx_ZEN, 0);
     +
     +	} else {
     +		__fpsimd_save_state(host_data_ptr(host_ctxt.fp_regs));
    @@ arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c: static bool kvm_handle_pvm_sys64(struct kvm_vc
     -
     -		/* Re-enable SVE traps if not supported for the guest vcpu. */
     -		if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
    --			cpacr_clear_set(CPACR_EL1_ZEN, 0);
    +-			cpacr_clear_set(CPACR_ELx_ZEN, 0);
     -
     -	} else {
     -		__fpsimd_save_state(*host_data_ptr(fpsimd_state));
---

NOTE: These results are for this patch alone. Full series testing will be
performed when all parts are received.

Results of testing on various branches:

| Branch                    | Patch Apply | Build Test |
|---------------------------|-------------|------------|
| stable/linux-6.13.y       |  Success    |  Success   |

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-03-21 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-21  0:12 [PATCH 6.12 v2 0/8] KVM: arm64: Backport of SVE fixes to v6.12 Mark Brown
2025-03-21  0:12 ` [PATCH 6.12 v2 1/8] KVM: arm64: Calculate cptr_el2 traps on activating traps Mark Brown
2025-03-21 17:28   ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-21  0:12 ` [PATCH 6.12 v2 2/8] KVM: arm64: Unconditionally save+flush host FPSIMD/SVE/SME state Mark Brown
2025-03-21 17:27   ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-21  0:12 ` [PATCH 6.12 v2 3/8] KVM: arm64: Remove host FPSIMD saving for non-protected KVM Mark Brown
2025-03-21  0:15   ` kernel test robot
2025-03-21  0:21   ` Mark Brown
2025-03-21 17:26   ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2025-03-21  0:13 ` [PATCH 6.12 v2 4/8] KVM: arm64: Remove VHE host restore of CPACR_EL1.ZEN Mark Brown
2025-03-21 17:26   ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-21  0:13 ` [PATCH 6.12 v2 5/8] KVM: arm64: Remove VHE host restore of CPACR_EL1.SMEN Mark Brown
2025-03-21 17:29   ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-21  0:13 ` [PATCH 6.12 v2 6/8] KVM: arm64: Refactor exit handlers Mark Brown
2025-03-21 17:25   ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-21  0:13 ` [PATCH 6.12 v2 7/8] KVM: arm64: Mark some header functions as inline Mark Brown
2025-03-21 17:27   ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-21  0:13 ` [PATCH 6.12 v2 8/8] KVM: arm64: Eagerly switch ZCR_EL{1,2} Mark Brown
2025-03-21 17:29   ` Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250321110532-03d8d336d445d068@stable.kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox