From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 440A8255E47 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2025 11:33:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742902409; cv=none; b=A1okxj60d6R0B+zDDPj1jhNsWbV/BYinkNcl2GfahorobAnzuiB5CMf8QdmQW2poFJOFzDJQk/aHzSdkPKxlsrscnAERYBg+7hJhnXZPo4QbrbAH/HO2dQ9VjxEitlfQKH7ifIkbGH0VMnI3hCYg0ixQXnLprrue/XjwfCkrpuk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742902409; c=relaxed/simple; bh=U+IveAyWdM9y2WETFLsA/NNWn/tlrwtnpm7TVXM2FI8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=twPNRMH1NHu3wgKHhO9LXpT+mwjLi226ANt+K6gXJi0vOJ6QTD9fYl5HRxQb+PN/nK8rRXCkf/gD/GczlIRsFUAOADCQfFIlM2NZpRcnEc6vADqjPjpf1Syb5cXj68AUDE+0bjIg/pFnMeDqXds276II9wsDKloENH+GDjwinXc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=CELftPFq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="CELftPFq" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52116C4CEE4; Tue, 25 Mar 2025 11:33:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1742902408; bh=U+IveAyWdM9y2WETFLsA/NNWn/tlrwtnpm7TVXM2FI8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CELftPFq9unhzkGo0oGYcZul3ppDd+9VzFGcUHwHoQ1SFkXFAiSCu1CsFHmv6AHUQ RPFfDBKvuw889KzmigMJpnXggqMqAHKNbaKhhUMpofniMu15TcQ0hqzijQYuJ9LpxK i+jRHOAhHdb4dvIiLNzv/KKlXt8u38P8yH542DWP4VNK3HRCBu+ei+Y7yopOEBRMeL VKoHtbPKIbo1AEDBdlk/oROAvP+PJKC/QN3yJ7dGg5z12MuJqmHfEgW7ZJnEca6OJ4 2OY5TYmLD67dFam1mGMs8yQ+s/PdW5sc1OdKH7gDv9OSbyGgLnzjGES3eZ/e+Uh0Sk 0h1ZQruJXdodw== From: Sasha Levin To: stable@vger.kernel.org, aurabindo.pillai@amd.com Cc: Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] drm/amd/display: should support dmub hw lock on Replay Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 07:33:27 -0400 Message-Id: <20250324234654-d463f40a9a48609e@stable.kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 In-Reply-To: <20250324164929.2622811-1-aurabindo.pillai@amd.com> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit [ Sasha's backport helper bot ] Hi, Summary of potential issues: ⚠️ Found matching upstream commit but patch is missing proper reference to it Found matching upstream commit: bfeefe6ea5f18cabb8fda55364079573804623f9 WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and found commit: Backport author: Aurabindo Pillai Commit author: Martin Tsai Status in newer kernel trees: 6.13.y | Present (exact SHA1) 6.12.y | Present (exact SHA1) 6.6.y | Not found Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit: --- 1: bfeefe6ea5f18 < -: ------------- drm/amd/display: should support dmub hw lock on Replay -: ------------- > 1: 344a09659766c Linux 6.1.131 --- Results of testing on various branches: | Branch | Patch Apply | Build Test | |---------------------------|-------------|------------| | stable/linux-6.1.y | Success | Success |