Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: chuck.lever@oracle.com,jlayton@kernel.org,trondmy@hammerspace.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] NFSD: Never return NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN when removing a" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 12:07:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025040848-resize-avert-7b05@gregkh> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 370345b4bd184a49ac68d6591801e5e3605b355a
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025040848-resize-avert-7b05@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:



thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 370345b4bd184a49ac68d6591801e5e3605b355a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2025 16:50:18 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] NFSD: Never return NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN when removing a
 directory

RFC 8881 Section 18.25.4 paragraph 5 tells us that the server
should return NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN only if the target object is an
opened file. This suggests that returning this status when removing
a directory will confuse NFS clients.

This is a version-specific issue; nfsd_proc_remove/rmdir() and
nfsd3_proc_remove/rmdir() already return nfserr_access as
appropriate.

Unfortunately there is no quick way for nfsd4_remove() to determine
whether the target object is a file or not, so the check is done in
in nfsd_unlink() for now.

Reported-by: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
Fixes: 466e16f0920f ("nfsd: check for EBUSY from vfs_rmdir/vfs_unink.")
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
index 749dd84bdb41..4e0a2c0549c7 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
@@ -1930,9 +1930,17 @@ nfsd_rename(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *ffhp, char *fname, int flen,
 	return err;
 }
 
-/*
- * Unlink a file or directory
- * N.B. After this call fhp needs an fh_put
+/**
+ * nfsd_unlink - remove a directory entry
+ * @rqstp: RPC transaction context
+ * @fhp: the file handle of the parent directory to be modified
+ * @type: enforced file type of the object to be removed
+ * @fname: the name of directory entry to be removed
+ * @flen: length of @fname in octets
+ *
+ * After this call fhp needs an fh_put.
+ *
+ * Returns a generic NFS status code in network byte-order.
  */
 __be32
 nfsd_unlink(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp, int type,
@@ -2006,10 +2014,14 @@ nfsd_unlink(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp, int type,
 	fh_drop_write(fhp);
 out_nfserr:
 	if (host_err == -EBUSY) {
-		/* name is mounted-on. There is no perfect
-		 * error status.
+		/*
+		 * See RFC 8881 Section 18.25.4 para 4: NFSv4 REMOVE
+		 * wants a status unique to the object type.
 		 */
-		err = nfserr_file_open;
+		if (type != S_IFDIR)
+			err = nfserr_file_open;
+		else
+			err = nfserr_acces;
 	}
 out:
 	return err != nfs_ok ? err : nfserrno(host_err);


                 reply	other threads:[~2025-04-08 10:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2025040848-resize-avert-7b05@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox