Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: yangang@kylinos.cn,kuba@kernel.org,matttbe@kernel.org,pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mptcp: fix NULL pointer in can_accept_new_subflow" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 13:08:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025041737-entrench-peroxide-5bc7@gregkh> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 443041deb5ef6a1289a99ed95015ec7442f141dc
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025041737-entrench-peroxide-5bc7@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:



thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 443041deb5ef6a1289a99ed95015ec7442f141dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gang Yan <yangang@kylinos.cn>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 15:27:16 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] mptcp: fix NULL pointer in can_accept_new_subflow

When testing valkey benchmark tool with MPTCP, the kernel panics in
'mptcp_can_accept_new_subflow' because subflow_req->msk is NULL.

Call trace:

  mptcp_can_accept_new_subflow (./net/mptcp/subflow.c:63 (discriminator 4)) (P)
  subflow_syn_recv_sock (./net/mptcp/subflow.c:854)
  tcp_check_req (./net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:863)
  tcp_v4_rcv (./net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2268)
  ip_protocol_deliver_rcu (./net/ipv4/ip_input.c:207)
  ip_local_deliver_finish (./net/ipv4/ip_input.c:234)
  ip_local_deliver (./net/ipv4/ip_input.c:254)
  ip_rcv_finish (./net/ipv4/ip_input.c:449)
  ...

According to the debug log, the same req received two SYN-ACK in a very
short time, very likely because the client retransmits the syn ack due
to multiple reasons.

Even if the packets are transmitted with a relevant time interval, they
can be processed by the server on different CPUs concurrently). The
'subflow_req->msk' ownership is transferred to the subflow the first,
and there will be a risk of a null pointer dereference here.

This patch fixes this issue by moving the 'subflow_req->msk' under the
`own_req == true` conditional.

Note that the !msk check in subflow_hmac_valid() can be dropped, because
the same check already exists under the own_req mpj branch where the
code has been moved to.

Fixes: 9466a1ccebbe ("mptcp: enable JOIN requests even if cookies are in use")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Gang Yan <yangang@kylinos.cn>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250328-net-mptcp-misc-fixes-6-15-v1-1-34161a482a7f@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
index efe8d86496db..409bd415ef1d 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
@@ -754,8 +754,6 @@ static bool subflow_hmac_valid(const struct request_sock *req,
 
 	subflow_req = mptcp_subflow_rsk(req);
 	msk = subflow_req->msk;
-	if (!msk)
-		return false;
 
 	subflow_generate_hmac(READ_ONCE(msk->remote_key),
 			      READ_ONCE(msk->local_key),
@@ -850,12 +848,8 @@ static struct sock *subflow_syn_recv_sock(const struct sock *sk,
 
 	} else if (subflow_req->mp_join) {
 		mptcp_get_options(skb, &mp_opt);
-		if (!(mp_opt.suboptions & OPTION_MPTCP_MPJ_ACK) ||
-		    !subflow_hmac_valid(req, &mp_opt) ||
-		    !mptcp_can_accept_new_subflow(subflow_req->msk)) {
-			SUBFLOW_REQ_INC_STATS(req, MPTCP_MIB_JOINACKMAC);
+		if (!(mp_opt.suboptions & OPTION_MPTCP_MPJ_ACK))
 			fallback = true;
-		}
 	}
 
 create_child:
@@ -905,6 +899,13 @@ static struct sock *subflow_syn_recv_sock(const struct sock *sk,
 				goto dispose_child;
 			}
 
+			if (!subflow_hmac_valid(req, &mp_opt) ||
+			    !mptcp_can_accept_new_subflow(subflow_req->msk)) {
+				SUBFLOW_REQ_INC_STATS(req, MPTCP_MIB_JOINACKMAC);
+				subflow_add_reset_reason(skb, MPTCP_RST_EPROHIBIT);
+				goto dispose_child;
+			}
+
 			/* move the msk reference ownership to the subflow */
 			subflow_req->msk = NULL;
 			ctx->conn = (struct sock *)owner;


                 reply	other threads:[~2025-04-17 11:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2025041737-entrench-peroxide-5bc7@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yangang@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox