From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 045721FF1A0 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 12:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745410627; cv=none; b=L8fq62RpTR7mXKbLM5CtW/G1KteoQw1ByuANGv1CRV2CTzMaYOrAaXVEXkSiNhWAKv/lI23nOFRi/1WUgU1hyzoHAcj/QtKOKcmsROg5r7tNu8/RWWD3JKt5L/vTbYQmXQV2z6aAeSvycx3VnZjicSARZ+03oXeXtNrT1/J76Y0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745410627; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CpDss3LBVP9tcyTwM6F9D353HVcrgrT8GC/0hOD1GUU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fUYev/Uls4nfkOLVvmCGbHmwg5jf7ta4ONoCsuxp3if1fHm/exu57uKOMkO44JEHo9xq3s+q6+GpB1kU1RzD90+ZJ2cqTRrgkNVmo6JPCB38ov8wemZ6DYEwSiZ/93uvAcy2OURN5vLYJBiRsiMgnM5WRUkMcPyjnjXAnCH4uH8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=P9F9Suiy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="P9F9Suiy" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7CB32C4CEE2; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 12:17:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1745410626; bh=CpDss3LBVP9tcyTwM6F9D353HVcrgrT8GC/0hOD1GUU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=P9F9Suiyxev+XQdzKyp14LwkQ8MFRJiyQWioNpCAw0W1lf6U9VtOfZUE8IuhuX8lo guL4nJ6Kq9qvZw8N3GCB8vJnbhnNQxdpKoLVVp4C5fvt47q+JPESThuF8Tz3djoVwZ EHG41isT0CwElylwOkzmVHehJRt/tyKiwVYe8+3BGYxu1c1duJaOZN2RrIYr0HIHlj IBgoqmt4iswr5GK9iJ7TPijo5ujq8cC6nZLA4T2971+++D27CjdVGdu1fSo/rGyiLD kqNGZkCa5FFMbiwMPrjC6o/D9hMfuNiIYkHSiMbTUETjX6VHNWxl9ngsET6tpguoLn IBLPJHyFTY0Tg== From: Sasha Levin To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: jianqi.ren.cn@windriver.com, Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10.y] net/sched: act_mirred: don't override retval if we already lost the skb Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 08:17:05 -0400 Message-Id: <20250423073225-0a390e62cf6bb07c@stable.kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 In-Reply-To: <20250423085936.2892096-1-jianqi.ren.cn@windriver.com> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit [ Sasha's backport helper bot ] Hi, ✅ All tests passed successfully. No issues detected. No action required from the submitter. The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: 166c2c8a6a4dc2e4ceba9e10cfe81c3e469e3210 WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and upstream commit: Backport author: Commit author: Jakub Kicinski Status in newer kernel trees: 6.14.y | Present (exact SHA1) 6.12.y | Present (exact SHA1) 6.6.y | Present (different SHA1: 28cdbbd38a44) 6.1.y | Not found 5.15.y | Not found Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit: --- 1: 166c2c8a6a4dc < -: ------------- net/sched: act_mirred: don't override retval if we already lost the skb -: ------------- > 1: 80f8a61846a5e net/sched: act_mirred: don't override retval if we already lost the skb --- Results of testing on various branches: | Branch | Patch Apply | Build Test | |---------------------------|-------------|------------| | stable/linux-5.10.y | Success | Success |