From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D84E1119A for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 12:16:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745410615; cv=none; b=Yjjca7oF0ClLICCTUE6i345UfdTt2XqNkP0fPPmykyTmBn7cg2YRQ0EsFfskXOHzRUWNE2WHsP3/M5CL8RjmbacymDm2HwdPKDtHWw9/QxF17tXlzZLy5vgQFZL2CZL9Zy0XAZb0c45OaSloyRzruhr1XqJTQt77ngH4Mh85E34= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745410615; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mkqLuxJ4SqgummZ0VhCmEdQx2pq+/+iXfzSNvCQL5TE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MaWLbAifwuQakYMb3pw1o47x9YZ0gqSLC6GEgM2xx2AXB4yQ8fau9ZiDlKHKJlK2noyl/p6LlYsrKfO/+P53EAwu926jhrDgkijHoy8PlFeG+sJyJudGoPAJfIEZkpN+us77tie1BaS8HsvPNwEMR9EDjkQv71WSJlHFkqBgIWQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=cMPzyj36; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="cMPzyj36" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 91A0BC4CEE2; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 12:16:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1745410615; bh=mkqLuxJ4SqgummZ0VhCmEdQx2pq+/+iXfzSNvCQL5TE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cMPzyj36HHbqSRZyZRBiJ85DX41Ovs/xUjW/C8jbuibaGmuMiXLgQy0uRySoOYR5Q AvSYnoGS+f4hleMMGCEfAC/IirA0s8qmK+vRMRz/9aXm86ocG+6gHXbHl1pClUcSTS b5rSta3fdViMDLi7K0udOvwLR+NtWjV5LwxJJwYIxYjfcCk2xWFe8w9Qc9z0xkfPvS QjWhEWswJr8hgAosiQce9ID+ql0gNKJd7PE8AM6Ainh2yFL8PFuqgey6xRGKl68N7a VYYv/ZzhmwfhG+fyXfoVDy9aKHLxNNpM2vjtUtT4u8u6zfzSAqkaKSxEhgLeCBQqkD 0M+MCVPqaWcqw== From: Sasha Levin To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Shung-Hsi Yu , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH stable 6.12 6/8] selftests/bpf: validate that tail call invalidates packet pointers Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 08:16:53 -0400 Message-Id: <20250423080743-3b522db5609e142e@stable.kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 In-Reply-To: <20250423055334.52791-7-shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit [ Sasha's backport helper bot ] Hi, ✅ All tests passed successfully. No issues detected. No action required from the submitter. The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: d9706b56e13b7916461ca6b4b731e169ed44ed09 WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and upstream commit: Backport author: Shung-Hsi Yu Commit author: Eduard Zingerman Status in newer kernel trees: 6.14.y | Present (exact SHA1) Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit: --- 1: d9706b56e13b7 ! 1: ace20a807473f selftests/bpf: validate that tail call invalidates packet pointers @@ Metadata ## Commit message ## selftests/bpf: validate that tail call invalidates packet pointers + commit d9706b56e13b7916461ca6b4b731e169ed44ed09 upstream. + Add a test case with a tail call done from a global sub-program. Such tails calls should be considered as invalidating packet pointers. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241210041100.1898468-9-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov + Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu ## tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_sock.c ## @@ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_sock.c: struct { --- Results of testing on various branches: | Branch | Patch Apply | Build Test | |---------------------------|-------------|------------| | stable/linux-6.14.y | Success | Success |