From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9AC613E41A; Sat, 26 Apr 2025 15:12:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745680373; cv=none; b=ojmREYrP6XBcg4T3sWmJGH6YlbxAKwmL7D8WP53Cf5Z5RfIjNn8g+CQXoNEPIRBytGkUQKQulnKTC7+jeAEo3DsEzAjAntx0CUhXq5R2vPNUAzOGGIjG9SO9hB3lE2AlYih6vdONJu7/4E80eyzBe1CUJ/VgdHhYs5nx22Btmd8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745680373; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RSTyDXmnY5NvI87lLbVOCtacxZJwYpD7DTZvdyNBZlQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kEhwPQUF+mtd9rQx0SeszxrswUMLLUaSQU90iLOtBl8gq6/84gOhnilVef5pRSgxBIM+s2MihWweOq+yQd4+rwGlv8Kc+VbjB4x5M1GdyVlINOB5XB3WfamSgYspveAYbwbpauYi7YwdVWfIGGfVvXku9d9yYbEZ1wN1E7yCFNI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Mp6sUUIB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Mp6sUUIB" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 793B0C4CEE2; Sat, 26 Apr 2025 15:12:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1745680373; bh=RSTyDXmnY5NvI87lLbVOCtacxZJwYpD7DTZvdyNBZlQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Mp6sUUIBPI3S/RmOtqTDlK168MPlbakc3Qzbb/AVGbqMHqM8L1R23JF03hhR15Ala 03xIc3XqMOp+JO9XMhG213evvv8ORPzg00iVnIZ8YgmiNCqm03uukc8Jh6iei3BStU 8JsUSotWyJxV3G0k/zHRCZmO/NnRdeOR9rcwVfRonBELc14o6vLqGWGO3UT/bAtjlQ tx9F4XUOpZ0CyPQ0A3pSCzL7Wmn6CUKT+e6wB1OL+LCaeFPAEESuYt8VaghBRA5B1g nLgIne7tA8ugidE7YKxzTjRJk4LSlIDLxJkUBSUj0wk8XMTJJiaBctBTbh7CTStUaJ 3THtgzfC7R/+w== Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2025 11:12:48 -0400 From: Nathan Chancellor To: Sasha Levin Cc: Kees Cook , stable@vger.kernel.org, stable-commits@vger.kernel.org, Marco Elver , Andrey Konovalov , Andrey Ryabinin , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: Patch "lib/Kconfig.ubsan: Remove 'default UBSAN' from UBSAN_INTEGER_WRAP" has been added to the 6.14-stable tree Message-ID: <20250426151248.GA2377568@ax162> References: <20250426132510.808646-1-sashal@kernel.org> <71399E4C-AAD6-4ACF-8256-8866394F3895@kernel.org> <20250426141107.GA3689756@ax162> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 10:52:32AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 10:11:07AM -0400, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > Sasha, it is a little insulting to me to have my manual backports > > ignored while you pull in extra unnecessary changes to make them apply > > Appologies: this is a case where some things falls through the cracks > between Greg and myself. Let me explain... > > Greg is usually picking up patches from the mailing list. I have the > annoying bot (which you might have seen) that tests backports folks send > over, but in reality I would rarely apply a backport someone sent over > (even if only so we won't step on each other's toes). > > On the other hand, I have some automation in place that after a few > days, it combs through the FAILED: mails that Greg sends out and will > attempt to automatically resolve conflicts by bringing in dependencies > and build testing the code. Maybe that automation could look to see if a patch has already been sent to the FAILED thread? Greg's instructions tell people to use '--in-reply-to' with the FAILED message ID so it would probably cover the vast majority of cases of manually backport. > I promise I haven't "manually" ignored your backports :) Sorry, I did not mean for that to sound as harsh and accusatory as it was and I appreciate the additional clarification around the process so that it can potentially be improved :) thanks for all the work you and Greg do. Cheers, Nathan