From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6693A389401; Mon, 5 May 2025 23:12:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746486753; cv=none; b=XTbGbxUquFUrOhdhxLFN0AdyJDSm0sunyZinmv+YODMPS9DAscU42dahgp2H1+3xfrJhCTNBpJP/MMVFOIdSZKYd0FUsUOZ6g7i9RViP9M1xWIz3Uh6khj2yQviThLZn+ymYmwutAuTzgo8yB9xds+OOgjyZEVddNAgYApVBLTQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746486753; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uk8MysGQEPaxlxxwg5K/J3eRbH1SAWnRT1OLiffH3GE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=XNHK+SVUwyDcPZ2pYknFUCKU33HV+uYUysmb21IqCMB2dJviA9cvFay1aKBCqlwkpZeD8s4aKzMweKBOqwFb/5C2advWoL3zkkuAmNGwDL49yWDfBDPLC9LiFhfRelxQ7AyTwZIM0/nin9ARECbwNxBPWzz8NUExwi9zLV9ZOIw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=UYuXc8n4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UYuXc8n4" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20BDAC4CEED; Mon, 5 May 2025 23:12:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1746486752; bh=uk8MysGQEPaxlxxwg5K/J3eRbH1SAWnRT1OLiffH3GE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UYuXc8n4/3QQMNQQ+iRlfSLY/Ov3JTnrNiNm1ivg7CWtB8oHoPdf9WhZXHpo7y+Mv cvRqFAVH7JmeDobLQk6zcvb9iu+0uXX6o2wbbFtS3pXaVQtlPLy+pVAuev8/yQ1wpA vIgeJqY1h0F7BnjGWb4r42sJnyxq8ikDjCPAjORdlrBVXi0GRiuXLEwyrgIG2S3wQE oRyxzxrUMRqTS/fjfzYO4/vntvAOk7BKXvl8bCDudbTl14gT0h+hSy9p6/d5Oh/COG GPt5MCW7Wuf6GjGGMOsOsER4HcyH1qUD7PmnHh91j0JkOifk7cHtlVjESTx0IuxLIe GUEgFqFrKDNjg== From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Oleg Nesterov , Frederic Weisbecker , Christian Brauner , Sasha Levin , akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com, mjguzik@gmail.com, alexjlzheng@tencent.com, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 184/212] exit: change the release_task() paths to call flush_sigqueue() lockless Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 19:05:56 -0400 Message-Id: <20250505230624.2692522-184-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 In-Reply-To: <20250505230624.2692522-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20250505230624.2692522-1-sashal@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore X-stable-base: Linux 6.1.136 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Oleg Nesterov [ Upstream commit fb3bbcfe344e64a46574a638b051ffd78762c12d ] A task can block a signal, accumulate up to RLIMIT_SIGPENDING sigqueues, and exit. In this case __exit_signal()->flush_sigqueue() called with irqs disabled can trigger a hard lockup, see https://lore.kernel.org/all/20190322114917.GC28876@redhat.com/ Fortunately, after the recent posixtimer changes sys_timer_delete() paths no longer try to clear SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC and/or free tmr->sigq, and after the exiting task passes __exit_signal() lock_task_sighand() can't succeed and pid_task(tmr->it_pid) will return NULL. This means that after __exit_signal(tsk) nobody can play with tsk->pending or (if group_dead) with tsk->signal->shared_pending, so release_task() can safely call flush_sigqueue() after write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock). TODO: - we can probably shift posix_cpu_timers_exit() as well - do_sigaction() can hit the similar problem Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250206152314.GA14620@redhat.com Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- kernel/exit.c | 19 +++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c index 49e4792405008..3ed45df420d9b 100644 --- a/kernel/exit.c +++ b/kernel/exit.c @@ -198,20 +198,13 @@ static void __exit_signal(struct task_struct *tsk) __unhash_process(tsk, group_dead); write_sequnlock(&sig->stats_lock); - /* - * Do this under ->siglock, we can race with another thread - * doing sigqueue_free() if we have SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC signals. - */ - flush_sigqueue(&tsk->pending); tsk->sighand = NULL; spin_unlock(&sighand->siglock); __cleanup_sighand(sighand); clear_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_SIGPENDING); - if (group_dead) { - flush_sigqueue(&sig->shared_pending); + if (group_dead) tty_kref_put(tty); - } } static void delayed_put_task_struct(struct rcu_head *rhp) @@ -281,6 +274,16 @@ void release_task(struct task_struct *p) proc_flush_pid(thread_pid); put_pid(thread_pid); release_thread(p); + /* + * This task was already removed from the process/thread/pid lists + * and lock_task_sighand(p) can't succeed. Nobody else can touch + * ->pending or, if group dead, signal->shared_pending. We can call + * flush_sigqueue() lockless. + */ + flush_sigqueue(&p->pending); + if (thread_group_leader(p)) + flush_sigqueue(&p->signal->shared_pending); + put_task_struct_rcu_user(p); p = leader; -- 2.39.5