From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B8C954670; Mon, 5 May 2025 14:06:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746454018; cv=none; b=hVCXz78VHkO3HMVbi/lLaVAoRhxxZiLPouvp54C0WBVwCeyBDdPHTQy+1B1XlWz7yfuwE8f3fincl+6uErDbVMhLql20m6kkOu4Y4ZSqU2RhiiAA6bKs53qWX8hJFB3D8OlIwp4Nz32eeGk4+h40WOmI5InzZSFkVHQOz57oT6M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746454018; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4yk0COCDs/croboSuTcvXVie79O3pi5hSv2UczCtjo4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=eJXZ9SHDn1qehjCNKxP6ToEYt6LwG79qgTO7Rxfb1bj9psVuHZvmuYUmYmS0YjipuXaqC1Kqlqjja1KSydjzkKauDvz26oGwWDoTItjfpL4UZIyhS7p6bJx0rUQg8VlhN3d3TZBYtmY9ilNaIXMgjOlvocv7EXEx7G7k12u5GPI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=rvCF32Ht; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="rvCF32Ht" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 70759C4CEEE; Mon, 5 May 2025 14:06:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1746454017; bh=4yk0COCDs/croboSuTcvXVie79O3pi5hSv2UczCtjo4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=rvCF32HtSqGtnRqF+z8FLBdbRzkWTWgrgechM+O6U1CeR6muJMw5JfmQndjBXhFcA K6wzpH1QyVvTWXxoljXAys4a/RBz+hi2B/FyrEbg9KVjh32KSJhYG62K9ZZ2kc7xqG GegTvRgPhWZWs4IkhERHL+Pt+lg/CoH1gQaJFpH0= Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 16:06:55 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Kent Overstreet Cc: linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs fixes for 6.14.y Message-ID: <2025050543-overkill-eradicate-2bdf@gregkh> References: <2025050523-oversweet-mooned-3934@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 09:54:24AM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 10:32:49AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 09:12:22PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > > > > > The following changes since commit 02a22be3c0003af08df510cba3d79d00c6495b74: > > > > > > bcachefs: bch2_ioctl_subvolume_destroy() fixes (2025-04-03 16:13:53 -0400) > > > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > > > git://evilpiepirate.org/bcachefs.git tags/bcachefs-for-6.14-2025-05-02 > > > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 52b17bca7b20663e5df6dbfc24cc2030259b64b6: > > > > > > bcachefs: Remove incorrect __counted_by annotation (2025-05-02 21:09:51 -0400) > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > bcachefs fixes for 6.15 > > > > > > remove incorrect counted_by annotation, fixing FORTIFY_SOURCE crashes > > > that have been hitting arch users > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Alan Huang (1): > > > bcachefs: Remove incorrect __counted_by annotation > > > > > > fs/bcachefs/xattr_format.h | 8 +++++++- > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > You list 1 patch here, but if I pull this, I see 2 patches against the > > latest linux-6.14.y branch. When rebased, the "additional" one goes > > away, as you already sent that to us in the past, so I'll just take the > > one that's left here, but please, make this more obvious what is > > happening. > > That's because you're rebasing my patches. Not really a "rebase", but rather a "cherry-pick", but we've been through this before, so no need to go over it again :) > > Also, I see a lot of syzbot fixes going into bcachefs recently, > > hopefully those are all for issues that only affected the tree after > > 6.14 was released. > > Until the experimental label comes off I'm only doing critical > backports - it really doesn't make any sense to do anything else right > now. Ok. > The syzbot stuff has had zero overlap with user reported bugs, and since > it's fuzzing the on disk image (and we don't support unprivilidged > mounts - yet, at least) - they haven't been a security concern. There's > been one security bug since 6.7, and you have that fix. Great, thanks! greg k-h