Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs fixes for 6.14.y

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 10:32:49AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 09:12:22PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > 
> > The following changes since commit 02a22be3c0003af08df510cba3d79d00c6495b74:
> > 
> >   bcachefs: bch2_ioctl_subvolume_destroy() fixes (2025-04-03 16:13:53 -0400)
> > 
> > are available in the Git repository at:
> > 
> >   git://evilpiepirate.org/bcachefs.git tags/bcachefs-for-6.14-2025-05-02
> > 
> > for you to fetch changes up to 52b17bca7b20663e5df6dbfc24cc2030259b64b6:
> > 
> >   bcachefs: Remove incorrect __counted_by annotation (2025-05-02 21:09:51 -0400)
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > bcachefs fixes for 6.15
> > 
> > remove incorrect counted_by annotation, fixing FORTIFY_SOURCE crashes
> > that have been hitting arch users
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Alan Huang (1):
> >       bcachefs: Remove incorrect __counted_by annotation
> > 
> >  fs/bcachefs/xattr_format.h | 8 +++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> You list 1 patch here, but if I pull this, I see 2 patches against the
> latest linux-6.14.y branch.  When rebased, the "additional" one goes
> away, as you already sent that to us in the past, so I'll just take the
> one that's left here, but please, make this more obvious what is
> happening.

Also, as this single commit is a revert of something in 6.12.y, should
it also be applied there to remove any false-positives happening with
those users?

thanks,

greg k-h