From: Jared Holzman <jholzman@nvidia.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk, ushankar@purestorage.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jholzman@nvidia.com
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/7] ublk: move device reset into ublk_ch_release()
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 02:37:51 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250506233755.4146156-4-jholzman@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250506233755.4146156-1-jholzman@nvidia.com>
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
ublk_ch_release() is called after ublk char device is closed, when all
uring_cmd are done, so it is perfect fine to move ublk device reset to
ublk_ch_release() from ublk_ctrl_start_recovery().
This way can avoid to grab the exiting daemon task_struct too long.
However, reset of the following ublk IO flags has to be moved until ublk
io_uring queues are ready:
- ubq->canceling
For requeuing IO in case of ublk_nosrv_dev_should_queue_io() before device
is recovered
- ubq->fail_io
For failing IO in case of UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY_FAIL_IO before device is
recovered
- ublk_io->flags
For preventing using io->cmd
With this way, recovery is simplified a lot.
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250416035444.99569-5-ming.lei@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 121 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index 9345a6d8dbd8..c619df880c72 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ static inline struct ublk_uring_cmd_pdu *ublk_get_uring_cmd_pdu(
static inline bool ubq_daemon_is_dying(struct ublk_queue *ubq)
{
- return ubq->ubq_daemon->flags & PF_EXITING;
+ return !ubq->ubq_daemon || ubq->ubq_daemon->flags & PF_EXITING;
}
/* todo: handle partial completion */
@@ -1440,6 +1440,37 @@ static const struct blk_mq_ops ublk_mq_ops = {
.timeout = ublk_timeout,
};
+static void ublk_queue_reinit(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ /* All old ioucmds have to be completed */
+ ubq->nr_io_ready = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * old daemon is PF_EXITING, put it now
+ *
+ * It could be NULL in case of closing one quisced device.
+ */
+ if (ubq->ubq_daemon)
+ put_task_struct(ubq->ubq_daemon);
+ /* We have to reset it to NULL, otherwise ub won't accept new FETCH_REQ */
+ ubq->ubq_daemon = NULL;
+ ubq->timeout = false;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ubq->q_depth; i++) {
+ struct ublk_io *io = &ubq->ios[i];
+
+ /*
+ * UBLK_IO_FLAG_CANCELED is kept for avoiding to touch
+ * io->cmd
+ */
+ io->flags &= UBLK_IO_FLAG_CANCELED;
+ io->cmd = NULL;
+ io->addr = 0;
+ }
+}
+
static int ublk_ch_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
{
struct ublk_device *ub = container_of(inode->i_cdev,
@@ -1451,10 +1482,26 @@ static int ublk_ch_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
return 0;
}
+static void ublk_reset_ch_dev(struct ublk_device *ub)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues; i++)
+ ublk_queue_reinit(ub, ublk_get_queue(ub, i));
+
+ /* set to NULL, otherwise new ubq_daemon cannot mmap the io_cmd_buf */
+ ub->mm = NULL;
+ ub->nr_queues_ready = 0;
+ ub->nr_privileged_daemon = 0;
+}
+
static int ublk_ch_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
{
struct ublk_device *ub = filp->private_data;
+ /* all uring_cmd has been done now, reset device & ubq */
+ ublk_reset_ch_dev(ub);
+
clear_bit(UB_STATE_OPEN, &ub->state);
return 0;
}
@@ -1801,6 +1848,24 @@ static void ublk_nosrv_work(struct work_struct *work)
ublk_cancel_dev(ub);
}
+/* reset ublk io_uring queue & io flags */
+static void ublk_reset_io_flags(struct ublk_device *ub)
+{
+ int i, j;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues; i++) {
+ struct ublk_queue *ubq = ublk_get_queue(ub, i);
+
+ /* UBLK_IO_FLAG_CANCELED can be cleared now */
+ spin_lock(&ubq->cancel_lock);
+ for (j = 0; j < ubq->q_depth; j++)
+ ubq->ios[j].flags &= ~UBLK_IO_FLAG_CANCELED;
+ spin_unlock(&ubq->cancel_lock);
+ ubq->canceling = false;
+ ubq->fail_io = false;
+ }
+}
+
/* device can only be started after all IOs are ready */
static void ublk_mark_io_ready(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq)
__must_hold(&ub->mutex)
@@ -1814,8 +1879,12 @@ static void ublk_mark_io_ready(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq)
if (capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
ub->nr_privileged_daemon++;
}
- if (ub->nr_queues_ready == ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues)
+
+ if (ub->nr_queues_ready == ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues) {
+ /* now we are ready for handling ublk io request */
+ ublk_reset_io_flags(ub);
complete_all(&ub->completion);
+ }
}
static inline int ublk_check_cmd_op(u32 cmd_op)
@@ -2866,42 +2935,15 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_set_params(struct ublk_device *ub,
return ret;
}
-static void ublk_queue_reinit(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq)
-{
- int i;
-
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!(ubq->ubq_daemon && ubq_daemon_is_dying(ubq)));
-
- /* All old ioucmds have to be completed */
- ubq->nr_io_ready = 0;
- /* old daemon is PF_EXITING, put it now */
- put_task_struct(ubq->ubq_daemon);
- /* We have to reset it to NULL, otherwise ub won't accept new FETCH_REQ */
- ubq->ubq_daemon = NULL;
- ubq->timeout = false;
-
- for (i = 0; i < ubq->q_depth; i++) {
- struct ublk_io *io = &ubq->ios[i];
-
- /* forget everything now and be ready for new FETCH_REQ */
- io->flags = 0;
- io->cmd = NULL;
- io->addr = 0;
- }
-}
-
static int ublk_ctrl_start_recovery(struct ublk_device *ub,
struct io_uring_cmd *cmd)
{
const struct ublksrv_ctrl_cmd *header = io_uring_sqe_cmd(cmd->sqe);
int ret = -EINVAL;
- int i;
mutex_lock(&ub->mutex);
if (ublk_nosrv_should_stop_dev(ub))
goto out_unlock;
- if (!ub->nr_queues_ready)
- goto out_unlock;
/*
* START_RECOVERY is only allowd after:
*
@@ -2925,12 +2967,6 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_start_recovery(struct ublk_device *ub,
goto out_unlock;
}
pr_devel("%s: start recovery for dev id %d.\n", __func__, header->dev_id);
- for (i = 0; i < ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues; i++)
- ublk_queue_reinit(ub, ublk_get_queue(ub, i));
- /* set to NULL, otherwise new ubq_daemon cannot mmap the io_cmd_buf */
- ub->mm = NULL;
- ub->nr_queues_ready = 0;
- ub->nr_privileged_daemon = 0;
init_completion(&ub->completion);
ret = 0;
out_unlock:
@@ -2944,7 +2980,6 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_end_recovery(struct ublk_device *ub,
const struct ublksrv_ctrl_cmd *header = io_uring_sqe_cmd(cmd->sqe);
int ublksrv_pid = (int)header->data[0];
int ret = -EINVAL;
- int i;
pr_devel("%s: Waiting for new ubq_daemons(nr: %d) are ready, dev id %d...\n",
__func__, ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues, header->dev_id);
@@ -2964,22 +2999,10 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_end_recovery(struct ublk_device *ub,
goto out_unlock;
}
ub->dev_info.ublksrv_pid = ublksrv_pid;
+ ub->dev_info.state = UBLK_S_DEV_LIVE;
pr_devel("%s: new ublksrv_pid %d, dev id %d\n",
__func__, ublksrv_pid, header->dev_id);
-
- blk_mq_quiesce_queue(ub->ub_disk->queue);
- ub->dev_info.state = UBLK_S_DEV_LIVE;
- for (i = 0; i < ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues; i++) {
- struct ublk_queue *ubq = ublk_get_queue(ub, i);
-
- ubq->canceling = false;
- ubq->fail_io = false;
- }
- blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(ub->ub_disk->queue);
- pr_devel("%s: queue unquiesced, dev id %d.\n",
- __func__, header->dev_id);
blk_mq_kick_requeue_list(ub->ub_disk->queue);
-
ret = 0;
out_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&ub->mutex);
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-06 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-06 23:37 [PATCH v1 0/7] ublk: Backport to 6.14-stable: fix race between io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task and ublk_cancel_cmd Jared Holzman
2025-05-06 23:37 ` [PATCH v1 1/7] ublk: add helper of ublk_need_map_io() Jared Holzman
2025-05-06 23:37 ` [PATCH v1 2/7] ublk: properly serialize all FETCH_REQs Jared Holzman
2025-05-06 23:37 ` Jared Holzman [this message]
2025-05-06 23:37 ` [PATCH v1 4/7] ublk: improve detection and handling of ublk server exit Jared Holzman
2025-05-06 23:37 ` [PATCH v1 5/7] ublk: remove __ublk_quiesce_dev() Jared Holzman
2025-05-06 23:37 ` [PATCH v1 6/7] ublk: simplify aborting ublk request Jared Holzman
2025-05-06 23:37 ` [PATCH v1 7/7] ublk: fix race between io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task and ublk_cancel_cmd Jared Holzman
2025-05-07 8:08 ` [PATCH v1 0/7] ublk: Backport to 6.14-stable: " Ming Lei
2025-05-07 9:14 ` Jared Holzman
2025-05-07 9:20 ` Greg KH
[not found] <20250506215511.4126251-4-jholzman@nvidia.com>
2025-05-06 22:02 ` [PATCH v1 3/7] ublk: move device reset into ublk_ch_release() Jared Holzman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250506233755.4146156-4-jholzman@nvidia.com \
--to=jholzman@nvidia.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox