public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jared Holzman <jholzman@nvidia.com>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.14.y v2 4/7] ublk: improve detection and handling of ublk server exit
Date: Thu,  8 May 2025 12:19:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250507084419-9650541528a84a25@stable.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250507094702.73459-5-jholzman@nvidia.com>

[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]

Hi,

✅ All tests passed successfully. No issues detected.
No action required from the submitter.

The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: 82a8a30c581bbbe653d33c6ce2ef67e3072c7f12

WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and upstream commit:
Backport author: Jared Holzman<jholzman@nvidia.com>
Commit author: Uday Shankar<ushankar@purestorage.com>

Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit:
---
1:  82a8a30c581bb ! 1:  7602c3e23b631 ublk: improve detection and handling of ublk server exit
    @@ Metadata
      ## Commit message ##
         ublk: improve detection and handling of ublk server exit
     
    +    [ Upstream commit 82a8a30c581bbbe653d33c6ce2ef67e3072c7f12 ]
    +
         There are currently two ways in which ublk server exit is detected by
         ublk_drv:
     
    @@ drivers/block/ublk_drv.c: struct ublk_params_header {
      };
      
     -static bool ublk_abort_requests(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq);
    --
    ++
     +static void ublk_stop_dev_unlocked(struct ublk_device *ub);
     +static void ublk_abort_queue(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq);
     +static void __ublk_quiesce_dev(struct ublk_device *ub);
    - static inline struct request *__ublk_check_and_get_req(struct ublk_device *ub,
    - 		struct ublk_queue *ubq, int tag, size_t offset);
    + 
      static inline unsigned int ublk_req_build_flags(struct request *req);
    + static inline struct ublksrv_io_desc *ublk_get_iod(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
     @@ drivers/block/ublk_drv.c: static void ublk_queue_cmd_list(struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct rq_list *l)
      static enum blk_eh_timer_return ublk_timeout(struct request *rq)
      {
    @@ drivers/block/ublk_drv.c: static struct gendisk *ublk_detach_disk(struct ublk_de
      	mutex_unlock(&ub->mutex);
      	ublk_cancel_dev(ub);
      }
    -@@ drivers/block/ublk_drv.c: static void ublk_remove(struct ublk_device *ub)
    - 	bool unprivileged;
    - 
    +@@ drivers/block/ublk_drv.c: static int ublk_add_tag_set(struct ublk_device *ub)
    + static void ublk_remove(struct ublk_device *ub)
    + {
      	ublk_stop_dev(ub);
     -	cancel_work_sync(&ub->nosrv_work);
      	cdev_device_del(&ub->cdev, &ub->cdev_dev);
    - 	unprivileged = ub->dev_info.flags & UBLK_F_UNPRIVILEGED_DEV;
      	ublk_put_device(ub);
    -@@ drivers/block/ublk_drv.c: static int ublk_ctrl_add_dev(const struct ublksrv_ctrl_cmd *header)
    + 	ublks_added--;
    +@@ drivers/block/ublk_drv.c: static int ublk_ctrl_add_dev(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd)
      		goto out_unlock;
      	mutex_init(&ub->mutex);
      	spin_lock_init(&ub->lock);
---

Results of testing on various branches:

| Branch                    | Patch Apply | Build Test |
|---------------------------|-------------|------------|
| stable/linux-5.4.y        |  Success    |  Success   |

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-08 16:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-07  9:46 [PATCH 6.14.y v2 0/7] ublk: fix race between io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task and ublk_cancel_cmd Jared Holzman
2025-05-07  9:46 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 1/7] ublk: add helper of ublk_need_map_io() Jared Holzman
2025-05-08 16:17   ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-07  9:46 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 2/7] ublk: properly serialize all FETCH_REQs Jared Holzman
2025-05-08 16:18   ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-07  9:46 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 3/7] ublk: move device reset into ublk_ch_release() Jared Holzman
2025-05-08 16:19   ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-07  9:46 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 4/7] ublk: improve detection and handling of ublk server exit Jared Holzman
2025-05-08 16:19   ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2025-05-07  9:47 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 5/7] ublk: remove __ublk_quiesce_dev() Jared Holzman
2025-05-08 16:17   ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-07  9:47 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 6/7] ublk: simplify aborting ublk request Jared Holzman
2025-05-08 16:18   ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-07  9:47 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 7/7] ublk: fix race between io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task and ublk_cancel_cmd Jared Holzman
2025-05-08 16:17   ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-07 11:18 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 0/7] " Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250507084419-9650541528a84a25@stable.kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=jholzman@nvidia.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox