From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jared Holzman <jholzman@nvidia.com>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.14.y v2 4/7] ublk: improve detection and handling of ublk server exit
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 12:19:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250507084419-9650541528a84a25@stable.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250507094702.73459-5-jholzman@nvidia.com>
[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]
Hi,
✅ All tests passed successfully. No issues detected.
No action required from the submitter.
The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: 82a8a30c581bbbe653d33c6ce2ef67e3072c7f12
WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and upstream commit:
Backport author: Jared Holzman<jholzman@nvidia.com>
Commit author: Uday Shankar<ushankar@purestorage.com>
Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit:
---
1: 82a8a30c581bb ! 1: 7602c3e23b631 ublk: improve detection and handling of ublk server exit
@@ Metadata
## Commit message ##
ublk: improve detection and handling of ublk server exit
+ [ Upstream commit 82a8a30c581bbbe653d33c6ce2ef67e3072c7f12 ]
+
There are currently two ways in which ublk server exit is detected by
ublk_drv:
@@ drivers/block/ublk_drv.c: struct ublk_params_header {
};
-static bool ublk_abort_requests(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq);
--
++
+static void ublk_stop_dev_unlocked(struct ublk_device *ub);
+static void ublk_abort_queue(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq);
+static void __ublk_quiesce_dev(struct ublk_device *ub);
- static inline struct request *__ublk_check_and_get_req(struct ublk_device *ub,
- struct ublk_queue *ubq, int tag, size_t offset);
+
static inline unsigned int ublk_req_build_flags(struct request *req);
+ static inline struct ublksrv_io_desc *ublk_get_iod(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
@@ drivers/block/ublk_drv.c: static void ublk_queue_cmd_list(struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct rq_list *l)
static enum blk_eh_timer_return ublk_timeout(struct request *rq)
{
@@ drivers/block/ublk_drv.c: static struct gendisk *ublk_detach_disk(struct ublk_de
mutex_unlock(&ub->mutex);
ublk_cancel_dev(ub);
}
-@@ drivers/block/ublk_drv.c: static void ublk_remove(struct ublk_device *ub)
- bool unprivileged;
-
+@@ drivers/block/ublk_drv.c: static int ublk_add_tag_set(struct ublk_device *ub)
+ static void ublk_remove(struct ublk_device *ub)
+ {
ublk_stop_dev(ub);
- cancel_work_sync(&ub->nosrv_work);
cdev_device_del(&ub->cdev, &ub->cdev_dev);
- unprivileged = ub->dev_info.flags & UBLK_F_UNPRIVILEGED_DEV;
ublk_put_device(ub);
-@@ drivers/block/ublk_drv.c: static int ublk_ctrl_add_dev(const struct ublksrv_ctrl_cmd *header)
+ ublks_added--;
+@@ drivers/block/ublk_drv.c: static int ublk_ctrl_add_dev(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd)
goto out_unlock;
mutex_init(&ub->mutex);
spin_lock_init(&ub->lock);
---
Results of testing on various branches:
| Branch | Patch Apply | Build Test |
|---------------------------|-------------|------------|
| stable/linux-5.4.y | Success | Success |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-08 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-07 9:46 [PATCH 6.14.y v2 0/7] ublk: fix race between io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task and ublk_cancel_cmd Jared Holzman
2025-05-07 9:46 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 1/7] ublk: add helper of ublk_need_map_io() Jared Holzman
2025-05-08 16:17 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-07 9:46 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 2/7] ublk: properly serialize all FETCH_REQs Jared Holzman
2025-05-08 16:18 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-07 9:46 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 3/7] ublk: move device reset into ublk_ch_release() Jared Holzman
2025-05-08 16:19 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-07 9:46 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 4/7] ublk: improve detection and handling of ublk server exit Jared Holzman
2025-05-08 16:19 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2025-05-07 9:47 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 5/7] ublk: remove __ublk_quiesce_dev() Jared Holzman
2025-05-08 16:17 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-07 9:47 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 6/7] ublk: simplify aborting ublk request Jared Holzman
2025-05-08 16:18 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-07 9:47 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 7/7] ublk: fix race between io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task and ublk_cancel_cmd Jared Holzman
2025-05-08 16:17 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-07 11:18 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 0/7] " Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250507084419-9650541528a84a25@stable.kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=jholzman@nvidia.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox