From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CCAA28980D; Wed, 7 May 2025 19:08:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746644905; cv=none; b=HkEsNiTApcd/o6/6JVwcEgzHntLOQuMhyPg/noSFAvEfwBKoSJbAKfQlvh10hMGexyhx2MhodmnwS1unSvRc9/b6uZ4z7XX8tl6FOpfcdZP6lFD0jDDJycZXcBnMbLutfok7YNjEZf6M9z7LfXvOyETMtevlSWvNvfTZqqifW1Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746644905; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JUVBgYauPu436Mntm9h6jkZnOvHLZHAnx95zUdS/wJ8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=l8VwUzXU5RnHxf2sic2RnzX/3JPhedp+xvp/ZlAKBUX7DFF0YTleTLrB5gIQ7qX4PxpVhMXU4yLhVYBpM/Fy5e+YZoU4qA2Gzs6yoLHGEi/eddMBJsmdukoGft/xmGRZJCtOoTTweQomUeM9hXiLoCeB7z9CDHzUtOONttgtles= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=cUuTtiyb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="cUuTtiyb" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8DD4C4CEE2; Wed, 7 May 2025 19:08:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1746644905; bh=JUVBgYauPu436Mntm9h6jkZnOvHLZHAnx95zUdS/wJ8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cUuTtiybaXpKuqMhp3AriTipMDy0YGWl/qo26SerkAhJDxlPV7e5qaf9vfwsQpU/A xr5GWak6FPvK/3gLhaKqW+h1cqKt5iNz6fsVw6gj72pyiyWbiv0EYB1n46nMva3zk0 vWLRTLUuhCJQX0cnr7bsEGXLSZhp9IzDzibjqops= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Stephan Gerhold , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Lifeng Zheng Subject: [PATCH 6.6 031/129] cpufreq: Fix setting policy limits when frequency tables are used Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 20:39:27 +0200 Message-ID: <20250507183814.788357180@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.49.0 In-Reply-To: <20250507183813.500572371@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20250507183813.500572371@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.68 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Rafael J. Wysocki commit b79028039f440e7d2c4df6ab243060c4e3803e84 upstream. Commit 7491cdf46b5c ("cpufreq: Avoid using inconsistent policy->min and policy->max") overlooked the fact that policy->min and policy->max were accessed directly in cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and in the functions called by it. Consequently, the changes made by that commit led to problems with setting policy limits. Address this by passing the target frequency limits to __resolve_freq() and cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and propagating them to the functions called by the latter. Fixes: 7491cdf46b5c ("cpufreq: Avoid using inconsistent policy->min and policy->max") Cc: 5.16+ # 5.16+ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/aAplED3IA_J0eZN0@linaro.org/ Reported-by: Stephan Gerhold Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Tested-by: Stephan Gerhold Reviewed-by: Lifeng Zheng Link: https://patch.msgid.link/5896780.DvuYhMxLoT@rjwysocki.net Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 22 ++++++--- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 3 - drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c | 6 +- include/linux/cpufreq.h | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 4 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -534,14 +534,18 @@ void cpufreq_disable_fast_switch(struct EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_disable_fast_switch); static unsigned int __resolve_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, - unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation) + unsigned int target_freq, + unsigned int min, unsigned int max, + unsigned int relation) { unsigned int idx; + target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, min, max); + if (!policy->freq_table) return target_freq; - idx = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, target_freq, relation); + idx = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, target_freq, min, max, relation); policy->cached_resolved_idx = idx; policy->cached_target_freq = target_freq; return policy->freq_table[idx].frequency; @@ -575,8 +579,7 @@ unsigned int cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq if (unlikely(min > max)) min = max; - return __resolve_freq(policy, clamp_val(target_freq, min, max), - CPUFREQ_RELATION_LE); + return __resolve_freq(policy, target_freq, min, max, CPUFREQ_RELATION_LE); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq); @@ -2348,8 +2351,8 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufr if (cpufreq_disabled()) return -ENODEV; - target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, policy->min, policy->max); - target_freq = __resolve_freq(policy, target_freq, relation); + target_freq = __resolve_freq(policy, target_freq, policy->min, + policy->max, relation); pr_debug("target for CPU %u: %u kHz, relation %u, requested %u kHz\n", policy->cpu, target_freq, relation, old_target_freq); @@ -2644,8 +2647,11 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpu * compiler optimizations around them because they may be accessed * concurrently by cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq() during the update. */ - WRITE_ONCE(policy->max, __resolve_freq(policy, new_data.max, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H)); - new_data.min = __resolve_freq(policy, new_data.min, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L); + WRITE_ONCE(policy->max, __resolve_freq(policy, new_data.max, + new_data.min, new_data.max, + CPUFREQ_RELATION_H)); + new_data.min = __resolve_freq(policy, new_data.min, new_data.min, + new_data.max, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L); WRITE_ONCE(policy->min, new_data.min > policy->max ? policy->max : new_data.min); trace_cpu_frequency_limits(policy); --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c @@ -77,7 +77,8 @@ static unsigned int generic_powersave_bi return freq_next; } - index = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, freq_next, relation); + index = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, freq_next, policy->min, + policy->max, relation); freq_req = freq_table[index].frequency; freq_reduc = freq_req * od_tuners->powersave_bias / 1000; freq_avg = freq_req - freq_reduc; --- a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c @@ -116,8 +116,8 @@ int cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_veri EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify); int cpufreq_table_index_unsorted(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, - unsigned int target_freq, - unsigned int relation) + unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int min, + unsigned int max, unsigned int relation) { struct cpufreq_frequency_table optimal = { .driver_data = ~0, @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ int cpufreq_table_index_unsorted(struct cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry_idx(pos, table, i) { freq = pos->frequency; - if ((freq < policy->min) || (freq > policy->max)) + if (freq < min || freq > max) continue; if (freq == target_freq) { optimal.driver_data = i; --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h @@ -787,8 +787,8 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(struc int cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy); int cpufreq_table_index_unsorted(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, - unsigned int target_freq, - unsigned int relation); + unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int min, + unsigned int max, unsigned int relation); int cpufreq_frequency_table_get_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int freq); @@ -853,12 +853,12 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_ind return best; } -/* Works only on sorted freq-tables */ -static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_l(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, - unsigned int target_freq, - bool efficiencies) +static inline int find_index_l(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, + unsigned int target_freq, + unsigned int min, unsigned int max, + bool efficiencies) { - target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, policy->min, policy->max); + target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, min, max); if (policy->freq_table_sorted == CPUFREQ_TABLE_SORTED_ASCENDING) return cpufreq_table_find_index_al(policy, target_freq, @@ -868,6 +868,14 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_ind efficiencies); } +/* Works only on sorted freq-tables */ +static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_l(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, + unsigned int target_freq, + bool efficiencies) +{ + return find_index_l(policy, target_freq, policy->min, policy->max, efficiencies); +} + /* Find highest freq at or below target in a table in ascending order */ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_ah(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq, @@ -921,12 +929,12 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_ind return best; } -/* Works only on sorted freq-tables */ -static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_h(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, - unsigned int target_freq, - bool efficiencies) +static inline int find_index_h(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, + unsigned int target_freq, + unsigned int min, unsigned int max, + bool efficiencies) { - target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, policy->min, policy->max); + target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, min, max); if (policy->freq_table_sorted == CPUFREQ_TABLE_SORTED_ASCENDING) return cpufreq_table_find_index_ah(policy, target_freq, @@ -936,6 +944,14 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_ind efficiencies); } +/* Works only on sorted freq-tables */ +static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_h(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, + unsigned int target_freq, + bool efficiencies) +{ + return find_index_h(policy, target_freq, policy->min, policy->max, efficiencies); +} + /* Find closest freq to target in a table in ascending order */ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_ac(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq, @@ -1006,12 +1022,12 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_ind return best; } -/* Works only on sorted freq-tables */ -static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_c(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, - unsigned int target_freq, - bool efficiencies) +static inline int find_index_c(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, + unsigned int target_freq, + unsigned int min, unsigned int max, + bool efficiencies) { - target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, policy->min, policy->max); + target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, min, max); if (policy->freq_table_sorted == CPUFREQ_TABLE_SORTED_ASCENDING) return cpufreq_table_find_index_ac(policy, target_freq, @@ -1021,7 +1037,17 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_ind efficiencies); } -static inline bool cpufreq_is_in_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int idx) +/* Works only on sorted freq-tables */ +static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_c(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, + unsigned int target_freq, + bool efficiencies) +{ + return find_index_c(policy, target_freq, policy->min, policy->max, efficiencies); +} + +static inline bool cpufreq_is_in_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, + unsigned int min, unsigned int max, + int idx) { unsigned int freq; @@ -1030,11 +1056,13 @@ static inline bool cpufreq_is_in_limits( freq = policy->freq_table[idx].frequency; - return freq == clamp_val(freq, policy->min, policy->max); + return freq == clamp_val(freq, min, max); } static inline int cpufreq_frequency_table_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq, + unsigned int min, + unsigned int max, unsigned int relation) { bool efficiencies = policy->efficiencies_available && @@ -1045,29 +1073,26 @@ static inline int cpufreq_frequency_tabl relation &= ~CPUFREQ_RELATION_E; if (unlikely(policy->freq_table_sorted == CPUFREQ_TABLE_UNSORTED)) - return cpufreq_table_index_unsorted(policy, target_freq, - relation); + return cpufreq_table_index_unsorted(policy, target_freq, min, + max, relation); retry: switch (relation) { case CPUFREQ_RELATION_L: - idx = cpufreq_table_find_index_l(policy, target_freq, - efficiencies); + idx = find_index_l(policy, target_freq, min, max, efficiencies); break; case CPUFREQ_RELATION_H: - idx = cpufreq_table_find_index_h(policy, target_freq, - efficiencies); + idx = find_index_h(policy, target_freq, min, max, efficiencies); break; case CPUFREQ_RELATION_C: - idx = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(policy, target_freq, - efficiencies); + idx = find_index_c(policy, target_freq, min, max, efficiencies); break; default: WARN_ON_ONCE(1); return 0; } - /* Limit frequency index to honor policy->min/max */ - if (!cpufreq_is_in_limits(policy, idx) && efficiencies) { + /* Limit frequency index to honor min and max */ + if (!cpufreq_is_in_limits(policy, min, max, idx) && efficiencies) { efficiencies = false; goto retry; }