* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/97] 6.1.138-rc2 review
2025-05-08 11:30 [PATCH 6.1 00/97] 6.1.138-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-05-08 12:55 ` Peter Schneider
2025-05-08 17:41 ` Jon Hunter
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Peter Schneider @ 2025-05-08 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
Am 08.05.2025 um 13:30 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.138 release.
> There are 97 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Builds, boots and works on my 2-socket Ivy Bridge Xeon E5-2697 v2 server. No dmesg
oddities or regressions found.
Tested-by: Peter Schneider <pschneider1968@googlemail.com>
Beste Grüße,
Peter Schneider
--
Climb the mountain not to plant your flag, but to embrace the challenge,
enjoy the air and behold the view. Climb it so you can see the world,
not so the world can see you. -- David McCullough Jr.
OpenPGP: 0xA3828BD796CCE11A8CADE8866E3A92C92C3FF244
Download: https://www.peters-netzplatz.de/download/pschneider1968_pub.asc
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@googlemail.com
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/97] 6.1.138-rc2 review
2025-05-08 11:30 [PATCH 6.1 00/97] 6.1.138-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-05-08 12:55 ` Peter Schneider
@ 2025-05-08 17:41 ` Jon Hunter
2025-05-08 17:59 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2025-05-08 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
linux-tegra, stable
On Thu, 08 May 2025 13:30:23 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.138 release.
> There are 97 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 10 May 2025 11:25:44 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.138-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.1:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
115 tests: 115 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.1.138-rc2-g7b2996f52bc8
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/97] 6.1.138-rc2 review
2025-05-08 11:30 [PATCH 6.1 00/97] 6.1.138-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-05-08 12:55 ` Peter Schneider
2025-05-08 17:41 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2025-05-08 17:59 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-05-08 19:59 ` Florian Fainelli
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2025-05-08 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On Thu, 8 May 2025 at 17:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.138 release.
> There are 97 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 10 May 2025 11:25:44 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.138-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Regressions on riscv with allmodconfig builds failed with clang-20
and gcc-13 toolchains on the stable-rc 6.1.138-rc1 and 6.1.138-rc2
* riscv, build
- clang-20-allmodconfig
- gcc-13-allmodconfig
Regression Analysis:
- New regression? Yes
- Reproducibility? Yes
Build regression: riscv uprobes.c unused variable 'start'
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build error riscv
arch/riscv/kernel/probes/uprobes.c: In function 'arch_uprobe_copy_ixol':
arch/riscv/kernel/probes/uprobes.c:164:23: error: unused variable
'start' [-Werror=unused-variable]
164 | unsigned long start = (unsigned long)dst;
| ^~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
## Build riscv
* Build log: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.136-100-g7b2996f52bc8/testrun/28376895/suite/build/test/gcc-13-allmodconfig/log
* Build history:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.136-100-g7b2996f52bc8/testrun/28376895/suite/build/test/gcc-13-allmodconfig/history/
* Build details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.136-100-g7b2996f52bc8/testrun/28376895/suite/build/test/gcc-13-allmodconfig/details/
* Build link: https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2woOEzI6voUB7CUa30K5x1JGa96/
* Kernel config:
https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2woOEzI6voUB7CUa30K5x1JGa96/config
* Toolchain: gcc-13 and clang-20
## Build
* kernel: 6.1.138-rc2
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: 7b2996f52bc811781aab0f470461a90634eac353
* git describe: v6.1.136-100-g7b2996f52bc8
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.136-100-g7b2996f52bc8/
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.134-451-gcc42c3189901)
* riscv, build
- clang-20-allmodconfig
- gcc-13-allmodconfig
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.134-451-gcc42c3189901)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.134-451-gcc42c3189901)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.134-451-gcc42c3189901)
## Test result summary
total: 93597, pass: 74005, fail: 4175, skip: 15107, xfail: 310
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 135 total, 135 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 43 total, 43 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 27 total, 20 passed, 7 failed
* mips: 26 total, 22 passed, 4 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 32 total, 31 passed, 1 failed
* riscv: 11 total, 9 passed, 2 failed
* s390: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 7 total, 7 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 35 total, 32 passed, 3 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* commands
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* lava
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/97] 6.1.138-rc2 review
2025-05-08 11:30 [PATCH 6.1 00/97] 6.1.138-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-05-08 17:59 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2025-05-08 19:59 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-05-10 1:41 ` Mark Brown
2025-05-11 8:04 ` Pavel Machek
5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2025-05-08 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, hargar, broonie
On 5/8/2025 1:30 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.138 release.
> There are 97 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 10 May 2025 11:25:44 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.138-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/97] 6.1.138-rc2 review
2025-05-08 11:30 [PATCH 6.1 00/97] 6.1.138-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-05-08 19:59 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2025-05-10 1:41 ` Mark Brown
2025-05-11 1:33 ` Mark Brown
2025-05-11 8:04 ` Pavel Machek
5 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-05-10 1:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 667 bytes --]
On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 01:30:23PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.138 release.
> There are 97 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
This breaks NFS boot on Rasperry Pi 3B - it's the previously reported
issue with there apparently being no packets coming in that was seen on
some of the more recent stables (not finding the mails immediately).
Bisects didn't kick off automatically but I suspect it's:
net: phy: microchip: force IRQ polling mode for lan88xx
This also seems to apply to v5.15.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/97] 6.1.138-rc2 review
2025-05-10 1:41 ` Mark Brown
@ 2025-05-11 1:33 ` Mark Brown
2025-05-12 14:04 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-05-11 1:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3855 bytes --]
On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 10:41:17AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 01:30:23PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.138 release.
> > There are 97 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
>
> This breaks NFS boot on Rasperry Pi 3B - it's the previously reported
> issue with there apparently being no packets coming in that was seen on
> some of the more recent stables (not finding the mails immediately).
> Bisects didn't kick off automatically but I suspect it's:
>
> net: phy: microchip: force IRQ polling mode for lan88xx
>
> This also seems to apply to v5.15.
The bisect completed, confirmed it's the above commit (though apparently
it was already broken so something's screwy with my automation here...):
# bad: [02b72ccb5f9df707a763d9f7163d7918d3aff0b7] Linux 6.1.138
# good: [535ec20c50273d81b2cc7985fed2108dee0e65d7] Linux 6.1.135
# good: [ac7079a42ea58e77123b55f5e15f1b2679f799aa] Linux 6.1.137
# good: [b6736e03756f42186840724eb38cb412dfb547be] Linux 6.1.136
git bisect start '02b72ccb5f9df707a763d9f7163d7918d3aff0b7' '535ec20c50273d81b2cc7985fed2108dee0e65d7' 'ac7079a42ea58e77123b55f5e15f1b2679f799aa' 'b6736e03756f42186840724eb38cb412dfb547be'
# test job: [ac7079a42ea58e77123b55f5e15f1b2679f799aa] https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/1356125
# test job: [b6736e03756f42186840724eb38cb412dfb547be] https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/1349213
# test job: [02b72ccb5f9df707a763d9f7163d7918d3aff0b7] https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/1375898
# bad: [02b72ccb5f9df707a763d9f7163d7918d3aff0b7] Linux 6.1.138
git bisect bad 02b72ccb5f9df707a763d9f7163d7918d3aff0b7
# test job: [94107259f972d2fd896dbbcaa176b3b2451ff9e5] https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/1379135
# good: [94107259f972d2fd896dbbcaa176b3b2451ff9e5] net: ethernet: mtk-star-emac: fix spinlock recursion issues on rx/tx poll
git bisect good 94107259f972d2fd896dbbcaa176b3b2451ff9e5
# test job: [8dcd4981166aedda08410a329938b11a497c7d5d] https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/1379203
# good: [8dcd4981166aedda08410a329938b11a497c7d5d] md: move initialization and destruction of 'io_acct_set' to md.c
git bisect good 8dcd4981166aedda08410a329938b11a497c7d5d
# test job: [36d4ce271b97d7d23a67e690b79e04ea853325b1] https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/1379282
# bad: [36d4ce271b97d7d23a67e690b79e04ea853325b1] Revert "drm/meson: vclk: fix calculation of 59.94 fractional rates"
git bisect bad 36d4ce271b97d7d23a67e690b79e04ea853325b1
# test job: [be9e23028113446add10a9b66cf8f15c66a6257f] https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/1379397
# good: [be9e23028113446add10a9b66cf8f15c66a6257f] sch_ets: make est_qlen_notify() idempotent
git bisect good be9e23028113446add10a9b66cf8f15c66a6257f
# test job: [88d7fd2d4623b2cb13d056e1bde1861e4dec2408] https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/1379447
# good: [88d7fd2d4623b2cb13d056e1bde1861e4dec2408] firmware: arm_ffa: Skip Rx buffer ownership release if not acquired
git bisect good 88d7fd2d4623b2cb13d056e1bde1861e4dec2408
# test job: [9b89102fbb8fc5393e2a0f981aafdb3cf43591ee] https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/1379515
# bad: [9b89102fbb8fc5393e2a0f981aafdb3cf43591ee] net: phy: microchip: force IRQ polling mode for lan88xx
git bisect bad 9b89102fbb8fc5393e2a0f981aafdb3cf43591ee
# test job: [72a797facb50aeef98a9d56b6b49674dbf53f692] https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/1379549
# good: [72a797facb50aeef98a9d56b6b49674dbf53f692] ARM: dts: opos6ul: add ksz8081 phy properties
git bisect good 72a797facb50aeef98a9d56b6b49674dbf53f692
# first bad commit: [9b89102fbb8fc5393e2a0f981aafdb3cf43591ee] net: phy: microchip: force IRQ polling mode for lan88xx
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/97] 6.1.138-rc2 review
2025-05-11 1:33 ` Mark Brown
@ 2025-05-12 14:04 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2025-05-12 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar
On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 10:33:13AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 10:41:17AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 01:30:23PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.138 release.
> > > There are 97 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> >
> > This breaks NFS boot on Rasperry Pi 3B - it's the previously reported
> > issue with there apparently being no packets coming in that was seen on
> > some of the more recent stables (not finding the mails immediately).
> > Bisects didn't kick off automatically but I suspect it's:
> >
> > net: phy: microchip: force IRQ polling mode for lan88xx
> >
> > This also seems to apply to v5.15.
>
> The bisect completed, confirmed it's the above commit (though apparently
> it was already broken so something's screwy with my automation here...):
>
> # bad: [02b72ccb5f9df707a763d9f7163d7918d3aff0b7] Linux 6.1.138
> # good: [535ec20c50273d81b2cc7985fed2108dee0e65d7] Linux 6.1.135
> # good: [ac7079a42ea58e77123b55f5e15f1b2679f799aa] Linux 6.1.137
> # good: [b6736e03756f42186840724eb38cb412dfb547be] Linux 6.1.136
> git bisect start '02b72ccb5f9df707a763d9f7163d7918d3aff0b7' '535ec20c50273d81b2cc7985fed2108dee0e65d7' 'ac7079a42ea58e77123b55f5e15f1b2679f799aa' 'b6736e03756f42186840724eb38cb412dfb547be'
> # test job: [ac7079a42ea58e77123b55f5e15f1b2679f799aa] https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/1356125
> # test job: [b6736e03756f42186840724eb38cb412dfb547be] https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/1349213
> # test job: [02b72ccb5f9df707a763d9f7163d7918d3aff0b7] https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/1375898
> # bad: [02b72ccb5f9df707a763d9f7163d7918d3aff0b7] Linux 6.1.138
> git bisect bad 02b72ccb5f9df707a763d9f7163d7918d3aff0b7
> # test job: [94107259f972d2fd896dbbcaa176b3b2451ff9e5] https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/1379135
> # good: [94107259f972d2fd896dbbcaa176b3b2451ff9e5] net: ethernet: mtk-star-emac: fix spinlock recursion issues on rx/tx poll
> git bisect good 94107259f972d2fd896dbbcaa176b3b2451ff9e5
> # test job: [8dcd4981166aedda08410a329938b11a497c7d5d] https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/1379203
> # good: [8dcd4981166aedda08410a329938b11a497c7d5d] md: move initialization and destruction of 'io_acct_set' to md.c
> git bisect good 8dcd4981166aedda08410a329938b11a497c7d5d
> # test job: [36d4ce271b97d7d23a67e690b79e04ea853325b1] https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/1379282
> # bad: [36d4ce271b97d7d23a67e690b79e04ea853325b1] Revert "drm/meson: vclk: fix calculation of 59.94 fractional rates"
> git bisect bad 36d4ce271b97d7d23a67e690b79e04ea853325b1
> # test job: [be9e23028113446add10a9b66cf8f15c66a6257f] https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/1379397
> # good: [be9e23028113446add10a9b66cf8f15c66a6257f] sch_ets: make est_qlen_notify() idempotent
> git bisect good be9e23028113446add10a9b66cf8f15c66a6257f
> # test job: [88d7fd2d4623b2cb13d056e1bde1861e4dec2408] https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/1379447
> # good: [88d7fd2d4623b2cb13d056e1bde1861e4dec2408] firmware: arm_ffa: Skip Rx buffer ownership release if not acquired
> git bisect good 88d7fd2d4623b2cb13d056e1bde1861e4dec2408
> # test job: [9b89102fbb8fc5393e2a0f981aafdb3cf43591ee] https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/1379515
> # bad: [9b89102fbb8fc5393e2a0f981aafdb3cf43591ee] net: phy: microchip: force IRQ polling mode for lan88xx
> git bisect bad 9b89102fbb8fc5393e2a0f981aafdb3cf43591ee
> # test job: [72a797facb50aeef98a9d56b6b49674dbf53f692] https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/1379549
> # good: [72a797facb50aeef98a9d56b6b49674dbf53f692] ARM: dts: opos6ul: add ksz8081 phy properties
> git bisect good 72a797facb50aeef98a9d56b6b49674dbf53f692
> # first bad commit: [9b89102fbb8fc5393e2a0f981aafdb3cf43591ee] net: phy: microchip: force IRQ polling mode for lan88xx
>
Thank you for the bisection, I'll go revert this from the 6.1.y and
5.15.y branches.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/97] 6.1.138-rc2 review
2025-05-08 11:30 [PATCH 6.1 00/97] 6.1.138-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-05-10 1:41 ` Mark Brown
@ 2025-05-11 8:04 ` Pavel Machek
2025-05-12 1:34 ` Yu Kuai
5 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2025-05-11 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, yukuai3
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, tglx, suzuki.poulose,
yukuai3
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 874 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.138 release.
> There are 97 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> irqchip/gic-v2m: Mark a few functions __init
This is not a bugfix, and is itself buggy, needing the next
patch. Just drop both.
> Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> irqchip/gic-v2m: Prevent use after free of gicv2m_get_fwnode()
> Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> md: move initialization and destruction of 'io_acct_set' to md.c
This seems to be preparation, not a bugfix.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/97] 6.1.138-rc2 review
2025-05-11 8:04 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2025-05-12 1:34 ` Yu Kuai
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yu Kuai @ 2025-05-12 1:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavel Machek, Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, tglx, suzuki.poulose,
yukuai (C)
Hi,
在 2025/05/11 16:04, Pavel Machek 写道:
> Hi!
>
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.138 release.
>> There are 97 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>
>> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> irqchip/gic-v2m: Mark a few functions __init
>
> This is not a bugfix, and is itself buggy, needing the next
> patch. Just drop both.
>
>> Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>> irqchip/gic-v2m: Prevent use after free of gicv2m_get_fwnode()
>
>> Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
>> md: move initialization and destruction of 'io_acct_set' to md.c
>
> This seems to be preparation, not a bugfix.
This must be applied ASAP, there are regression that following patch is
merged without this one:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/aBJH6Nsh-7Zj55nN@eldamar.lan/
Thanks,
Kuai
>
> Best regards,
> Pavel
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread