From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD346A934; Mon, 12 May 2025 09:31:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747042283; cv=none; b=uOb78wzl3v//GpYD6O/EQ//zgsiiK2i06piQVBe75vX+6oN2MyR9gLjQCP2JWpca4m7GHOh5bC1MPFnt6iBSM40ngQjezwsO0HdT8mE8QMc+CkZx5KiDwOO69qi3UoPh8USPeK6AXNoEpWBK80kKusO0ZfRb00AntnWk+hfkGWg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747042283; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Pl5wI9ryAPdgORdBss+zWHr/rLzZLPqpkrMyNkyLOrE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=f+E7fUlmvj9M/ipy0EaXJeQEDsEvMmugrBu8Azsj2UmSKhS6ICOj6sRBURV9GQVQxadehq+n0hN0uA0hZhVtxXwiNPYN620UMwwqglRwiT6uX1EEvU0fgqLEwwk4BjzGpcaFlMvJqYF2jPTH0T76xnFdXehP7CKotr0aGjziRx0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=aqDkcM5k; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="aqDkcM5k" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A0A26C4CEE7; Mon, 12 May 2025 09:31:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1747042283; bh=Pl5wI9ryAPdgORdBss+zWHr/rLzZLPqpkrMyNkyLOrE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=aqDkcM5kbzBSpqfa2DcUZcTC2CN2/IqVXcfwUnQ3zOru/LJ5p5i/z9LwkUsDTxXrI Y7IsYEHkb7pMDcSwuybWOhiCoiDMnlTmFOnjZ0dBJJbseASIbRBKBZGSru1x4LldDz kYZdcga4bRl1nnHM2Lz2mzYKK+Ii+7HDatDcArwc= Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 11:31:20 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Pavel Machek Cc: Florian Fainelli , stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, jonathanh@nvidia.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/569] 6.1.129-rc2 review Message-ID: <2025051205-return-blame-ba79@gregkh> References: <20250220104545.805660879@linuxfoundation.org> <80ab673f-aa94-43e2-899a-0c5a22f3f1e0@gmail.com> <2025022221-revert-hubcap-f519@gregkh> <2025022213-brewery-synergy-b4bf@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 11:21:20AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Sat 2025-02-22 10:39:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 10:21:18AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > On Sat 2025-02-22 07:28:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 09:45:15AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2/20/2025 2:57 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.129 release. > > > > > > There are 569 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > > > > > Responses should be made by Sat, 22 Feb 2025 10:44:04 +0000. > > > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > > > > And yet there was a v6.1.29 tag created already? > > > > > > > > Sometimes I'm faster, which is usually the case for -rc2 and later, I go > > > > off of the -rc1 date if the people that had problems with -rc1 have > > > > reported that the newer -rc fixes their reported issues. > > > > > > Well, quoting time down to second then doing something completely > > > different is quite confusing. Please fix your scripts. > > > > Patches gladly welcome :) > > It is not okay to send misleading emails just because script generated > them. *plonk*