public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 v2 13/14] x86/its: Align RETs in BHB clear sequence to avoid thunking
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 16:13:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250514113946-23aea5f5b7d675ec@stable.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250513-its-5-15-v2-13-90690efdc7e0@linux.intel.com>

[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]

Hi,

✅ All tests passed successfully. No issues detected.
No action required from the submitter.

The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: f0cd7091cc5a032c8870b4285305d9172569d126

Status in newer kernel trees:
6.14.y | Present (different SHA1: 375fe8890b23)
6.12.y | Present (different SHA1: 5eaa60e1baf1)
6.6.y | Present (different SHA1: f17249f8a872)
6.1.y | Present (different SHA1: 724e897203bd)

Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit:
---
1:  f0cd7091cc5a0 ! 1:  9b2b6206dceda x86/its: Align RETs in BHB clear sequence to avoid thunking
    @@ Metadata
      ## Commit message ##
         x86/its: Align RETs in BHB clear sequence to avoid thunking
     
    +    commit f0cd7091cc5a032c8870b4285305d9172569d126 upstream.
    +
         The software mitigation for BHI is to execute BHB clear sequence at syscall
         entry, and possibly after a cBPF program. ITS mitigation thunks RETs in the
         lower half of the cacheline. This causes the RETs in the BHB clear sequence
    @@ arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S: SYM_CODE_END(rewind_stack_and_make_dead)
     + * Target Selection, rather than taking the slowpath via its_return_thunk.
       */
      SYM_FUNC_START(clear_bhb_loop)
    - 	ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
    + 	push	%rbp
     @@ arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S: SYM_FUNC_START(clear_bhb_loop)
      	call	1f
      	jmp	5f
---

Results of testing on various branches:

| Branch                    | Patch Apply | Build Test |
|---------------------------|-------------|------------|
| stable/linux-6.1.y        |  Success    |  Success   |

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-14 20:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-14  6:06 [PATCH 5.15 v2 00/14] ITS mitigation Pawan Gupta
2025-05-14  6:06 ` [PATCH 5.15 v2 01/14] x86,nospec: Simplify {JMP,CALL}_NOSPEC Pawan Gupta
2025-05-14 20:13   ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-14  6:07 ` [PATCH 5.15 v2 02/14] x86/speculation: Simplify and make CALL_NOSPEC consistent Pawan Gupta
2025-05-14 20:14   ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-14  6:07 ` [PATCH 5.15 v2 03/14] x86/speculation: Add a conditional CS prefix to CALL_NOSPEC Pawan Gupta
2025-05-14 20:14   ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-14  6:07 ` [PATCH 5.15 v2 04/14] x86/speculation: Remove the extra #ifdef around CALL_NOSPEC Pawan Gupta
2025-05-14 20:13   ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-14  6:07 ` [PATCH 5.15 v2 05/14] Documentation: x86/bugs/its: Add ITS documentation Pawan Gupta
2025-05-14 20:14   ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-14  6:08 ` [PATCH 5.15 v2 06/14] x86/its: Enumerate Indirect Target Selection (ITS) bug Pawan Gupta
2025-05-14 20:13   ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-14  6:08 ` [PATCH 5.15 v2 07/14] x86/its: Add support for ITS-safe indirect thunk Pawan Gupta
2025-05-14 20:14   ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-14  6:08 ` [PATCH 5.15 v2 08/14] x86/alternative: Optimize returns patching Pawan Gupta
2025-05-14 20:14   ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-14  6:08 ` [PATCH 5.15 v2 09/14] x86/alternatives: Remove faulty optimization Pawan Gupta
2025-05-14 20:13   ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-14  6:09 ` [PATCH 5.15 v2 10/14] x86/its: Add support for ITS-safe return thunk Pawan Gupta
2025-05-14 20:13   ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-14  6:09 ` [PATCH 5.15 v2 11/14] x86/its: Enable Indirect Target Selection mitigation Pawan Gupta
2025-05-14 20:14   ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-14  6:09 ` [PATCH 5.15 v2 12/14] x86/its: Add "vmexit" option to skip mitigation on some CPUs Pawan Gupta
2025-05-14 20:14   ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-14  6:10 ` [PATCH 5.15 v2 13/14] x86/its: Align RETs in BHB clear sequence to avoid thunking Pawan Gupta
2025-05-14 20:13   ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2025-05-14  6:10 ` [PATCH 5.15 v2 14/14] x86/its: Use dynamic thunks for indirect branches Pawan Gupta
2025-05-14 20:14   ` Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250514113946-23aea5f5b7d675ec@stable.kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox