From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 v3 04/16] x86/speculation: Remove the extra #ifdef around CALL_NOSPEC
Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 09:08:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250516213242-5bf905acca84582a@stable.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250516-its-5-15-v3-4-16fcdaaea544@linux.intel.com>
[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]
Hi,
✅ All tests passed successfully. No issues detected.
No action required from the submitter.
The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: c8c81458863ab686cda4fe1e603fccaae0f12460
Status in newer kernel trees:
6.14.y | Not found
6.12.y | Present (different SHA1: 02a1d6e26129)
6.6.y | Present (different SHA1: 8149e4bc5b6a)
6.1.y | Present (different SHA1: 84e06e948fc5)
Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit:
---
1: c8c81458863ab ! 1: 31b985df4b5be x86/speculation: Remove the extra #ifdef around CALL_NOSPEC
@@ Metadata
## Commit message ##
x86/speculation: Remove the extra #ifdef around CALL_NOSPEC
+ commit c8c81458863ab686cda4fe1e603fccaae0f12460 upstream.
+
Commit:
010c4a461c1d ("x86/speculation: Simplify and make CALL_NOSPEC consistent")
- added an #ifdef CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE around the CALL_NOSPEC definition.
- This is not required as this code is already under a larger #ifdef.
+ added an #ifdef CONFIG_RETPOLINE around the CALL_NOSPEC definition. This is
+ not required as this code is already under a larger #ifdef.
Remove the extra #ifdef, no functional change.
vmlinux size remains same before and after this change:
- CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE=y:
+ CONFIG_RETPOLINE=y:
text data bss dec hex filename
25434752 7342290 2301212 35078254 217406e vmlinux.before
25434752 7342290 2301212 35078254 217406e vmlinux.after
- # CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE is not set:
+ # CONFIG_RETPOLINE is not set:
text data bss dec hex filename
22943094 6214994 1550152 30708240 1d49210 vmlinux.before
22943094 6214994 1550152 30708240 1d49210 vmlinux.after
+ [ pawan: s/CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE/CONFIG_RETPOLINE/ ]
+
Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250320-call-nospec-extra-ifdef-v1-1-d9b084d24820@linux.intel.com
## arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h ##
-@@ arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h: static inline void call_depth_return_thunk(void) {}
+@@ arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h: extern retpoline_thunk_t __x86_indirect_thunk_array[];
* Inline asm uses the %V modifier which is only in newer GCC
- * which is ensured when CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE is defined.
+ * which is ensured when CONFIG_RETPOLINE is defined.
*/
--#ifdef CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE
+-#ifdef CONFIG_RETPOLINE
#define CALL_NOSPEC __CS_PREFIX("%V[thunk_target]") \
"call __x86_indirect_thunk_%V[thunk_target]\n"
-#else
---
Results of testing on various branches:
| Branch | Patch Apply | Build Test |
|---------------------------|-------------|------------|
| stable/linux-6.1.y | Success | Success |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-17 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-16 23:59 [PATCH 5.15 v3 00/16] ITS mitigation Pawan Gupta
2025-05-16 23:59 ` [PATCH 5.15 v3 01/16] x86,nospec: Simplify {JMP,CALL}_NOSPEC Pawan Gupta
2025-05-17 13:08 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-16 23:59 ` [PATCH 5.15 v3 02/16] x86/speculation: Simplify and make CALL_NOSPEC consistent Pawan Gupta
2025-05-17 13:08 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-17 0:00 ` [PATCH 5.15 v3 03/16] x86/speculation: Add a conditional CS prefix to CALL_NOSPEC Pawan Gupta
2025-05-17 13:08 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-17 0:00 ` [PATCH 5.15 v3 04/16] x86/speculation: Remove the extra #ifdef around CALL_NOSPEC Pawan Gupta
2025-05-17 13:08 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2025-05-17 0:00 ` [PATCH 5.15 v3 05/16] Documentation: x86/bugs/its: Add ITS documentation Pawan Gupta
2025-05-17 13:08 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-17 0:01 ` [PATCH 5.15 v3 06/16] x86/its: Enumerate Indirect Target Selection (ITS) bug Pawan Gupta
2025-05-17 13:08 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-17 0:01 ` [PATCH 5.15 v3 07/16] x86/its: Add support for ITS-safe indirect thunk Pawan Gupta
2025-05-17 13:08 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-17 0:01 ` [PATCH 5.15 v3 08/16] x86/alternative: Optimize returns patching Pawan Gupta
2025-05-17 13:08 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-17 0:01 ` [PATCH 5.15 v3 09/16] x86/alternatives: Remove faulty optimization Pawan Gupta
2025-05-17 13:08 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-17 0:02 ` [PATCH 5.15 v3 10/16] x86/its: Add support for ITS-safe return thunk Pawan Gupta
2025-05-17 13:08 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-17 0:02 ` [PATCH 5.15 v3 11/16] x86/its: Enable Indirect Target Selection mitigation Pawan Gupta
2025-05-17 13:08 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-17 0:02 ` [PATCH 5.15 v3 12/16] x86/its: Add "vmexit" option to skip mitigation on some CPUs Pawan Gupta
2025-05-17 13:08 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-17 0:02 ` [PATCH 5.15 v3 13/16] x86/its: Align RETs in BHB clear sequence to avoid thunking Pawan Gupta
2025-05-17 13:08 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-17 0:03 ` [PATCH 5.15 v3 14/16] x86/its: Use dynamic thunks for indirect branches Pawan Gupta
2025-05-17 13:08 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-17 0:03 ` [PATCH 5.15 v3 15/16] x86/its: Fix build errors when CONFIG_MODULES=n Pawan Gupta
2025-05-17 13:08 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-17 0:03 ` [PATCH 5.15 v3 16/16] x86/its: FineIBT-paranoid vs ITS Pawan Gupta
2025-05-17 13:08 ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-07 9:34 ` [PATCH 5.15 v3 00/16] ITS mitigation Salvatore Bonaccorso
2025-06-09 13:31 ` Pawan Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250516213242-5bf905acca84582a@stable.kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox