From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org,bp@alien8.de,hannes@cmpxchg.org,jackmanb@google.com,mhocko@suse.com,stable@vger.kernel.org,surenb@google.com,tglx@linutronix.de,vbabka@suse.cz
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/page_alloc: fix race condition in unaccepted memory" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 15:13:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025051947-dimly-marina-9d5e@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x fefc075182275057ce607effaa3daa9e6e3bdc73
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025051947-dimly-marina-9d5e@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From fefc075182275057ce607effaa3daa9e6e3bdc73 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 16:32:07 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: fix race condition in unaccepted memory
handling
The page allocator tracks the number of zones that have unaccepted memory
using static_branch_enc/dec() and uses that static branch in hot paths to
determine if it needs to deal with unaccepted memory.
Borislav and Thomas pointed out that the tracking is racy: operations on
static_branch are not serialized against adding/removing unaccepted pages
to/from the zone.
Sanity checks inside static_branch machinery detects it:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10 at kernel/jump_label.c:276 __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked+0x8e/0xa0
The comment around the WARN() explains the problem:
/*
* Warn about the '-1' case though; since that means a
* decrement is concurrent with a first (0->1) increment. IOW
* people are trying to disable something that wasn't yet fully
* enabled. This suggests an ordering problem on the user side.
*/
The effect of this static_branch optimization is only visible on
microbenchmark.
Instead of adding more complexity around it, remove it altogether.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250506133207.1009676-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: dcdfdd40fa82 ("mm: Add support for unaccepted memory")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250506092445.GBaBnVXXyvnazly6iF@fat_crate.local
Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [6.5+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
index 25a29872c634..5c7a2b43ad76 100644
--- a/mm/internal.h
+++ b/mm/internal.h
@@ -1590,7 +1590,6 @@ unsigned long move_page_tables(struct pagetable_move_control *pmc);
#ifdef CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY
void accept_page(struct page *page);
-void unaccepted_cleanup_work(struct work_struct *work);
#else /* CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY */
static inline void accept_page(struct page *page)
{
diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c
index 327764ca0ee4..eedce9321e13 100644
--- a/mm/mm_init.c
+++ b/mm/mm_init.c
@@ -1441,7 +1441,6 @@ static void __meminit zone_init_free_lists(struct zone *zone)
#ifdef CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&zone->unaccepted_pages);
- INIT_WORK(&zone->unaccepted_cleanup, unaccepted_cleanup_work);
#endif
}
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 7248e300d36e..8258349e49ac 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -7172,16 +7172,8 @@ bool has_managed_dma(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY
-/* Counts number of zones with unaccepted pages. */
-static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(zones_with_unaccepted_pages);
-
static bool lazy_accept = true;
-void unaccepted_cleanup_work(struct work_struct *work)
-{
- static_branch_dec(&zones_with_unaccepted_pages);
-}
-
static int __init accept_memory_parse(char *p)
{
if (!strcmp(p, "lazy")) {
@@ -7206,11 +7198,7 @@ static bool page_contains_unaccepted(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
static void __accept_page(struct zone *zone, unsigned long *flags,
struct page *page)
{
- bool last;
-
list_del(&page->lru);
- last = list_empty(&zone->unaccepted_pages);
-
account_freepages(zone, -MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES, MIGRATE_MOVABLE);
__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_UNACCEPTED, -MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES);
__ClearPageUnaccepted(page);
@@ -7219,28 +7207,6 @@ static void __accept_page(struct zone *zone, unsigned long *flags,
accept_memory(page_to_phys(page), PAGE_SIZE << MAX_PAGE_ORDER);
__free_pages_ok(page, MAX_PAGE_ORDER, FPI_TO_TAIL);
-
- if (last) {
- /*
- * There are two corner cases:
- *
- * - If allocation occurs during the CPU bring up,
- * static_branch_dec() cannot be used directly as
- * it causes a deadlock on cpu_hotplug_lock.
- *
- * Instead, use schedule_work() to prevent deadlock.
- *
- * - If allocation occurs before workqueues are initialized,
- * static_branch_dec() should be called directly.
- *
- * Workqueues are initialized before CPU bring up, so this
- * will not conflict with the first scenario.
- */
- if (system_wq)
- schedule_work(&zone->unaccepted_cleanup);
- else
- unaccepted_cleanup_work(&zone->unaccepted_cleanup);
- }
}
void accept_page(struct page *page)
@@ -7277,20 +7243,12 @@ static bool try_to_accept_memory_one(struct zone *zone)
return true;
}
-static inline bool has_unaccepted_memory(void)
-{
- return static_branch_unlikely(&zones_with_unaccepted_pages);
-}
-
static bool cond_accept_memory(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
int alloc_flags)
{
long to_accept, wmark;
bool ret = false;
- if (!has_unaccepted_memory())
- return false;
-
if (list_empty(&zone->unaccepted_pages))
return false;
@@ -7328,22 +7286,17 @@ static bool __free_unaccepted(struct page *page)
{
struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
unsigned long flags;
- bool first = false;
if (!lazy_accept)
return false;
spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
- first = list_empty(&zone->unaccepted_pages);
list_add_tail(&page->lru, &zone->unaccepted_pages);
account_freepages(zone, MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES, MIGRATE_MOVABLE);
__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_UNACCEPTED, MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES);
__SetPageUnaccepted(page);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags);
- if (first)
- static_branch_inc(&zones_with_unaccepted_pages);
-
return true;
}
next reply other threads:[~2025-05-19 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-19 13:13 gregkh [this message]
2025-05-20 8:00 ` [PATCH 6.6.y] mm/page_alloc: fix race condition in unaccepted memory handling Kirill A. Shutemov
2025-05-20 13:36 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025051947-dimly-marina-9d5e@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox