From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Zhaoyang Li <lizy04@hust.edu.cn>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, dzm91@hust.edu.cn,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Vlad Poenaru <vlad.wing@gmail.com>,
Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] hrtimers: Force migrate away hrtimers queued after CPUHP_AP_HRTIMERS_DYING
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 13:32:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025052041-slobbery-slum-3b74@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250513060430.378468-1-lizy04@hust.edu.cn>
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 02:04:30PM +0800, Zhaoyang Li wrote:
> From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
>
> [ Upstream commit 53dac345395c0d2493cbc2f4c85fe38aef5b63f5 ]
>
> hrtimers are migrated away from the dying CPU to any online target at
> the CPUHP_AP_HRTIMERS_DYING stage in order not to delay bandwidth timers
> handling tasks involved in the CPU hotplug forward progress.
>
> However wakeups can still be performed by the outgoing CPU after
> CPUHP_AP_HRTIMERS_DYING. Those can result again in bandwidth timers being
> armed. Depending on several considerations (crystal ball power management
> based election, earliest timer already enqueued, timer migration enabled or
> not), the target may eventually be the current CPU even if offline. If that
> happens, the timer is eventually ignored.
>
> The most notable example is RCU which had to deal with each and every of
> those wake-ups by deferring them to an online CPU, along with related
> workarounds:
>
> _ e787644caf76 (rcu: Defer RCU kthreads wakeup when CPU is dying)
> _ 9139f93209d1 (rcu/nocb: Fix RT throttling hrtimer armed from offline CPU)
> _ f7345ccc62a4 (rcu/nocb: Fix rcuog wake-up from offline softirq)
>
> The problem isn't confined to RCU though as the stop machine kthread
> (which runs CPUHP_AP_HRTIMERS_DYING) reports its completion at the end
> of its work through cpu_stop_signal_done() and performs a wake up that
> eventually arms the deadline server timer:
>
> WARNING: CPU: 94 PID: 588 at kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1086 hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x289/0x2d0
> CPU: 94 UID: 0 PID: 588 Comm: migration/94 Not tainted
> Stopper: multi_cpu_stop+0x0/0x120 <- stop_machine_cpuslocked+0x66/0xc0
> RIP: 0010:hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x289/0x2d0
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> start_dl_timer
> enqueue_dl_entity
> dl_server_start
> enqueue_task_fair
> enqueue_task
> ttwu_do_activate
> try_to_wake_up
> complete
> cpu_stopper_thread
>
> Instead of providing yet another bandaid to work around the situation, fix
> it in the hrtimers infrastructure instead: always migrate away a timer to
> an online target whenever it is enqueued from an offline CPU.
>
> This will also allow to revert all the above RCU disgraceful hacks.
>
> Fixes: 5c0930ccaad5 ("hrtimers: Push pending hrtimers away from outgoing CPU earlier")
> Reported-by: Vlad Poenaru <vlad.wing@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250117232433.24027-1-frederic@kernel.org
> Closes: 20241213203739.1519801-1-usamaarif642@gmail.com
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Li <lizy04@hust.edu.cn>
> ---
You forgot to send a 6.6.y version as well :(
Now dropped from my queue, please resend both.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-20 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-10 15:01 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] hrtimers: Force migrate away hrtimers queued after" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2025-05-13 6:04 ` [PATCH 6.1.y] hrtimers: Force migrate away hrtimers queued after CPUHP_AP_HRTIMERS_DYING Zhaoyang Li
2025-05-13 18:49 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-20 11:32 ` Greg KH [this message]
2025-05-20 13:21 ` 李朝阳
2025-05-21 2:02 ` Zhaoyang Li
2025-05-22 2:03 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025052041-slobbery-slum-3b74@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=dzm91@hust.edu.cn \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=lizy04@hust.edu.cn \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
--cc=vlad.wing@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox