From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6] x86/its: Fix build error for its_static_thunk()
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 10:48:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025052057-prognosis-hush-bf23@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250519-its-build-fix-6-6-v1-1-225ac41eb447@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 01:43:42PM -0700, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> Due to a likely merge resolution error of backport commit 772934d9062a
> ("x86/its: FineIBT-paranoid vs ITS"), the function its_static_thunk() was
> placed in the wrong ifdef block, causing a build error when
> CONFIG_MITIGATION_ITS and CONFIG_FINEIBT are both disabled:
>
> /linux-6.6/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:1452:5: error: redefinition of 'its_static_thunk'
> 1452 | u8 *its_static_thunk(int reg)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Fix it by moving its_static_thunk() under CONFIG_MITIGATION_ITS.
>
> Reported-by: Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250519164717.18738b4e@ncopa-desktop/
> Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> commit ("x86/its: FineIBT-paranoid vs ITS") was resolved correctly in
> v6.12:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=v6.12.29&id=7e78061be78b8593df9b0cd0f21b1fee425035de
>
> Fix is required in v6.6 and v6.1
Thanks for this, now queued up for 6.6.y, but I think 6.1.y is ok, as
this didn't apply there, nor did I get any build reports of problems for
it yet. So I'll leave that be for now.
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-20 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-14 13:04 [PATCH 6.6 000/113] 6.6.91-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-05-14 15:34 ` Jon Hunter
2025-05-14 18:34 ` Pavel Machek
2025-05-14 18:59 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2025-05-14 20:05 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-05-14 20:33 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2025-05-14 20:49 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-05-15 5:35 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-05-15 15:25 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-05-15 15:29 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-05-16 8:03 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-05-16 20:42 ` [PATCH 6.1] x86/its: Fix build errors when CONFIG_MODULES=n Pawan Gupta
2025-05-17 6:53 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-05-17 13:07 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-19 15:27 ` [PATCH 6.6 000/113] 6.6.91-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-05-19 19:50 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-05-19 20:43 ` [PATCH 6.6] x86/its: Fix build error for its_static_thunk() Pawan Gupta
2025-05-20 7:52 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-20 8:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2025-05-14 20:47 ` [PATCH 6.6 000/113] 6.6.91-rc2 review Guenter Roeck
2025-05-15 5:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-05-15 8:03 ` Mark Brown
2025-05-15 8:10 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-05-15 12:01 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-05-19 13:49 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025052057-prognosis-hush-bf23@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=ncopa@alpinelinux.org \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox