public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
Cc: stefanha@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-block@vger.kernel.or,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, lirongqing@baidu.com, kch@nvidia.com,
	xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	jasowang@redhat.com, Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>,
	Israel Rukshin <israelr@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] virtio_blk: Fix disk deletion hang on device surprise removal
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 04:17:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250521041506-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250521062744.1361774-1-parav@nvidia.com>

On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 06:37:41AM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> When the PCI device is surprise removed, requests may not complete
> the device as the VQ is marked as broken. Due to this, the disk
> deletion hangs.
> 
> Fix it by aborting the requests when the VQ is broken.
> 
> With this fix now fio completes swiftly.
> An alternative of IO timeout has been considered, however
> when the driver knows about unresponsive block device, swiftly clearing
> them enables users and upper layers to react quickly.
> 
> Verified with multiple device unplug iterations with pending requests in
> virtio used ring and some pending with the device.
> 
> Fixes: 43bb40c5b926 ("virtio_pci: Support surprise removal of virtio pci device")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: lirongqing@baidu.com
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/virtualization/c45dd68698cd47238c55fb73ca9b4741@baidu.com/
> Reviewed-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Israel Rukshin <israelr@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
> ---
> changelog:
> v0->v1:
> - Fixed comments from Stefan to rename a cleanup function
> - Improved logic for handling any outstanding requests
>   in bio layer
> - improved cancel callback to sync with ongoing done()

thanks for the patch!
questions:


> ---
>  drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 95 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> index 7cffea01d868..5212afdbd3c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> @@ -435,6 +435,13 @@ static blk_status_t virtio_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>  	blk_status_t status;
>  	int err;
>  
> +	/* Immediately fail all incoming requests if the vq is broken.
> +	 * Once the queue is unquiesced, upper block layer flushes any pending
> +	 * queued requests; fail them right away.
> +	 */
> +	if (unlikely(virtqueue_is_broken(vblk->vqs[qid].vq)))
> +		return BLK_STS_IOERR;
> +
>  	status = virtblk_prep_rq(hctx, vblk, req, vbr);
>  	if (unlikely(status))
>  		return status;

just below this:
        spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vqs[qid].lock, flags);
        err = virtblk_add_req(vblk->vqs[qid].vq, vbr);
        if (err) {


and virtblk_add_req calls virtqueue_add_sgs, so it will fail
on a broken vq.

Why do we need to check it one extra time here?



> @@ -508,6 +515,11 @@ static void virtio_queue_rqs(struct rq_list *rqlist)
>  	while ((req = rq_list_pop(rqlist))) {
>  		struct virtio_blk_vq *this_vq = get_virtio_blk_vq(req->mq_hctx);
>  
> +		if (unlikely(virtqueue_is_broken(this_vq->vq))) {
> +			rq_list_add_tail(&requeue_list, req);
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +
>  		if (vq && vq != this_vq)
>  			virtblk_add_req_batch(vq, &submit_list);
>  		vq = this_vq;

similarly

> @@ -1554,6 +1566,87 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
> +static bool virtblk_request_cancel(struct request *rq, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct virtblk_req *vbr = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(rq);
> +	struct virtio_blk *vblk = data;
> +	struct virtio_blk_vq *vq;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	vq = &vblk->vqs[rq->mq_hctx->queue_num];
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&vq->lock, flags);
> +
> +	vbr->in_hdr.status = VIRTIO_BLK_S_IOERR;
> +	if (blk_mq_request_started(rq) && !blk_mq_request_completed(rq))
> +		blk_mq_complete_request(rq);
> +
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vq->lock, flags);
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static void virtblk_broken_device_cleanup(struct virtio_blk *vblk)
> +{
> +	struct request_queue *q = vblk->disk->queue;
> +
> +	if (!virtqueue_is_broken(vblk->vqs[0].vq))
> +		return;
> +
> +	/* Start freezing the queue, so that new requests keeps waitng at the
> +	 * door of bio_queue_enter(). We cannot fully freeze the queue because
> +	 * freezed queue is an empty queue and there are pending requests, so
> +	 * only start freezing it.
> +	 */
> +	blk_freeze_queue_start(q);
> +
> +	/* When quiescing completes, all ongoing dispatches have completed
> +	 * and no new dispatch will happen towards the driver.
> +	 * This ensures that later when cancel is attempted, then are not
> +	 * getting processed by the queue_rq() or queue_rqs() handlers.
> +	 */
> +	blk_mq_quiesce_queue(q);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Synchronize with any ongoing VQ callbacks, effectively quiescing
> +	 * the device and preventing it from completing further requests
> +	 * to the block layer. Any outstanding, incomplete requests will be
> +	 * completed by virtblk_request_cancel().
> +	 */
> +	virtio_synchronize_cbs(vblk->vdev);
> +
> +	/* At this point, no new requests can enter the queue_rq() and
> +	 * completion routine will not complete any new requests either for the
> +	 * broken vq. Hence, it is safe to cancel all requests which are
> +	 * started.
> +	 */
> +	blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(&vblk->tag_set, virtblk_request_cancel, vblk);
> +	blk_mq_tagset_wait_completed_request(&vblk->tag_set);
> +
> +	/* All pending requests are cleaned up. Time to resume so that disk
> +	 * deletion can be smooth. Start the HW queues so that when queue is
> +	 * unquiesced requests can again enter the driver.
> +	 */
> +	blk_mq_start_stopped_hw_queues(q, true);
> +
> +	/* Unquiescing will trigger dispatching any pending requests to the
> +	 * driver which has crossed bio_queue_enter() to the driver.
> +	 */
> +	blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(q);
> +
> +	/* Wait for all pending dispatches to terminate which may have been
> +	 * initiated after unquiescing.
> +	 */
> +	blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait(q);
> +
> +	/* Mark the disk dead so that once queue unfreeze, the requests
> +	 * waiting at the door of bio_queue_enter() can be aborted right away.
> +	 */
> +	blk_mark_disk_dead(vblk->disk);
> +
> +	/* Unfreeze the queue so that any waiting requests will be aborted. */
> +	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue_nomemrestore(q);
> +}
> +
>  static void virtblk_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  {
>  	struct virtio_blk *vblk = vdev->priv;
> @@ -1561,6 +1654,8 @@ static void virtblk_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  	/* Make sure no work handler is accessing the device. */
>  	flush_work(&vblk->config_work);
>  
> +	virtblk_broken_device_cleanup(vblk);
> +
>  	del_gendisk(vblk->disk);
>  	blk_mq_free_tag_set(&vblk->tag_set);
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1


       reply	other threads:[~2025-05-21  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20250521062744.1361774-1-parav@nvidia.com>
2025-05-21  8:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2025-05-21  9:14   ` [PATCH v1] virtio_blk: Fix disk deletion hang on device surprise removal Parav Pandit
2025-05-21  9:19     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-05-21  9:32       ` Parav Pandit
2025-05-21 10:16         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-05-21 10:34           ` Parav Pandit
2025-05-21 10:43             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-05-21 12:40               ` Parav Pandit
2025-05-21 16:49                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-05-21 14:56 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-05-22  2:57   ` Parav Pandit
2025-05-22 14:36     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-05-22 14:55       ` Parav Pandit
2025-05-22 18:12         ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-05-22 18:58           ` Parav Pandit
2025-05-26  9:23         ` Parav Pandit
2025-05-26 13:29           ` Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250521041506-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=israelr@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.or \
    --cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
    --cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=parav@nvidia.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox