From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
Cc: mst@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
lirongqing@baidu.com, kch@nvidia.com, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>,
Israel Rukshin <israelr@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] virtio_blk: Fix disk deletion hang on device surprise removal
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 10:56:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250521145635.GA120766@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250521062744.1361774-1-parav@nvidia.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6519 bytes --]
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 06:37:41AM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> When the PCI device is surprise removed, requests may not complete
> the device as the VQ is marked as broken. Due to this, the disk
> deletion hangs.
>
> Fix it by aborting the requests when the VQ is broken.
>
> With this fix now fio completes swiftly.
> An alternative of IO timeout has been considered, however
> when the driver knows about unresponsive block device, swiftly clearing
> them enables users and upper layers to react quickly.
>
> Verified with multiple device unplug iterations with pending requests in
> virtio used ring and some pending with the device.
>
> Fixes: 43bb40c5b926 ("virtio_pci: Support surprise removal of virtio pci device")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: lirongqing@baidu.com
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/virtualization/c45dd68698cd47238c55fb73ca9b4741@baidu.com/
> Reviewed-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Israel Rukshin <israelr@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
> ---
> changelog:
> v0->v1:
> - Fixed comments from Stefan to rename a cleanup function
> - Improved logic for handling any outstanding requests
> in bio layer
> - improved cancel callback to sync with ongoing done()
>
> ---
> drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 95 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> index 7cffea01d868..5212afdbd3c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> @@ -435,6 +435,13 @@ static blk_status_t virtio_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> blk_status_t status;
> int err;
>
> + /* Immediately fail all incoming requests if the vq is broken.
> + * Once the queue is unquiesced, upper block layer flushes any pending
> + * queued requests; fail them right away.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(virtqueue_is_broken(vblk->vqs[qid].vq)))
> + return BLK_STS_IOERR;
> +
> status = virtblk_prep_rq(hctx, vblk, req, vbr);
> if (unlikely(status))
> return status;
> @@ -508,6 +515,11 @@ static void virtio_queue_rqs(struct rq_list *rqlist)
> while ((req = rq_list_pop(rqlist))) {
> struct virtio_blk_vq *this_vq = get_virtio_blk_vq(req->mq_hctx);
>
> + if (unlikely(virtqueue_is_broken(this_vq->vq))) {
> + rq_list_add_tail(&requeue_list, req);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> if (vq && vq != this_vq)
> virtblk_add_req_batch(vq, &submit_list);
> vq = this_vq;
> @@ -1554,6 +1566,87 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> return err;
> }
>
> +static bool virtblk_request_cancel(struct request *rq, void *data)
> +{
> + struct virtblk_req *vbr = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(rq);
> + struct virtio_blk *vblk = data;
> + struct virtio_blk_vq *vq;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + vq = &vblk->vqs[rq->mq_hctx->queue_num];
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&vq->lock, flags);
> +
> + vbr->in_hdr.status = VIRTIO_BLK_S_IOERR;
> + if (blk_mq_request_started(rq) && !blk_mq_request_completed(rq))
> + blk_mq_complete_request(rq);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vq->lock, flags);
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static void virtblk_broken_device_cleanup(struct virtio_blk *vblk)
> +{
> + struct request_queue *q = vblk->disk->queue;
> +
> + if (!virtqueue_is_broken(vblk->vqs[0].vq))
> + return;
Can a subset of virtqueues be broken? If so, then this code doesn't
handle it.
> +
> + /* Start freezing the queue, so that new requests keeps waitng at the
s/waitng/waiting/
> + * door of bio_queue_enter(). We cannot fully freeze the queue because
> + * freezed queue is an empty queue and there are pending requests, so
> + * only start freezing it.
> + */
> + blk_freeze_queue_start(q);
> +
> + /* When quiescing completes, all ongoing dispatches have completed
> + * and no new dispatch will happen towards the driver.
> + * This ensures that later when cancel is attempted, then are not
> + * getting processed by the queue_rq() or queue_rqs() handlers.
> + */
> + blk_mq_quiesce_queue(q);
> +
> + /*
> + * Synchronize with any ongoing VQ callbacks, effectively quiescing
> + * the device and preventing it from completing further requests
> + * to the block layer. Any outstanding, incomplete requests will be
> + * completed by virtblk_request_cancel().
> + */
> + virtio_synchronize_cbs(vblk->vdev);
> +
> + /* At this point, no new requests can enter the queue_rq() and
> + * completion routine will not complete any new requests either for the
> + * broken vq. Hence, it is safe to cancel all requests which are
> + * started.
> + */
> + blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(&vblk->tag_set, virtblk_request_cancel, vblk);
Although virtio_synchronize_cbs() was called, a broken/malicious device
can still raise IRQs. Would that lead to use-after-free or similar
undefined behavior for requests that have been submitted to the device?
It seems safer to reset the device before marking the requests as
failed.
> + blk_mq_tagset_wait_completed_request(&vblk->tag_set);
> +
> + /* All pending requests are cleaned up. Time to resume so that disk
> + * deletion can be smooth. Start the HW queues so that when queue is
> + * unquiesced requests can again enter the driver.
> + */
> + blk_mq_start_stopped_hw_queues(q, true);
> +
> + /* Unquiescing will trigger dispatching any pending requests to the
> + * driver which has crossed bio_queue_enter() to the driver.
> + */
> + blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(q);
> +
> + /* Wait for all pending dispatches to terminate which may have been
> + * initiated after unquiescing.
> + */
> + blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait(q);
> +
> + /* Mark the disk dead so that once queue unfreeze, the requests
> + * waiting at the door of bio_queue_enter() can be aborted right away.
> + */
> + blk_mark_disk_dead(vblk->disk);
> +
> + /* Unfreeze the queue so that any waiting requests will be aborted. */
> + blk_mq_unfreeze_queue_nomemrestore(q);
> +}
> +
> static void virtblk_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> {
> struct virtio_blk *vblk = vdev->priv;
> @@ -1561,6 +1654,8 @@ static void virtblk_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> /* Make sure no work handler is accessing the device. */
> flush_work(&vblk->config_work);
>
> + virtblk_broken_device_cleanup(vblk);
> +
> del_gendisk(vblk->disk);
> blk_mq_free_tag_set(&vblk->tag_set);
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-21 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250521062744.1361774-1-parav@nvidia.com>
2025-05-21 8:17 ` [PATCH v1] virtio_blk: Fix disk deletion hang on device surprise removal Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-05-21 9:14 ` Parav Pandit
2025-05-21 9:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-05-21 9:32 ` Parav Pandit
2025-05-21 10:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-05-21 10:34 ` Parav Pandit
2025-05-21 10:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-05-21 12:40 ` Parav Pandit
2025-05-21 16:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-05-21 14:56 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2025-05-22 2:57 ` Parav Pandit
2025-05-22 14:36 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-05-22 14:55 ` Parav Pandit
2025-05-22 18:12 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-05-22 18:58 ` Parav Pandit
2025-05-26 9:23 ` Parav Pandit
2025-05-26 13:29 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250521145635.GA120766@fedora \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=israelr@nvidia.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
--cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox