stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] posix-cpu-timers: fix race between handle_posix_cpu_timers()" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree
@ 2025-06-17 14:47 gregkh
  2025-06-17 17:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2025-06-17 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: oleg, bsevens, torvalds; +Cc: stable


The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x f90fff1e152dedf52b932240ebbd670d83330eca
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025061744-precinct-rubble-45c9@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:



thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From f90fff1e152dedf52b932240ebbd670d83330eca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 19:26:50 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] posix-cpu-timers: fix race between handle_posix_cpu_timers()
 and posix_cpu_timer_del()
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

If an exiting non-autoreaping task has already passed exit_notify() and
calls handle_posix_cpu_timers() from IRQ, it can be reaped by its parent
or debugger right after unlock_task_sighand().

If a concurrent posix_cpu_timer_del() runs at that moment, it won't be
able to detect timer->it.cpu.firing != 0: cpu_timer_task_rcu() and/or
lock_task_sighand() will fail.

Add the tsk->exit_state check into run_posix_cpu_timers() to fix this.

This fix is not needed if CONFIG_POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK=y, because
exit_task_work() is called before exit_notify(). But the check still
makes sense, task_work_add(&tsk->posix_cputimers_work.work) will fail
anyway in this case.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Benoît Sevens <bsevens@google.com>
Fixes: 0bdd2ed4138e ("sched: run_posix_cpu_timers: Don't check ->exit_state, use lock_task_sighand()")
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
index 50e8d04ab661..2e5b89d7d866 100644
--- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -1405,6 +1405,15 @@ void run_posix_cpu_timers(void)
 
 	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
 
+	/*
+	 * Ensure that release_task(tsk) can't happen while
+	 * handle_posix_cpu_timers() is running. Otherwise, a concurrent
+	 * posix_cpu_timer_del() may fail to lock_task_sighand(tsk) and
+	 * miss timer->it.cpu.firing != 0.
+	 */
+	if (tsk->exit_state)
+		return;
+
 	/*
 	 * If the actual expiry is deferred to task work context and the
 	 * work is already scheduled there is no point to do anything here.


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] posix-cpu-timers: fix race between handle_posix_cpu_timers()" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree
  2025-06-17 14:47 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] posix-cpu-timers: fix race between handle_posix_cpu_timers()" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree gregkh
@ 2025-06-17 17:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
  2025-06-19  9:02   ` Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2025-06-17 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gregkh; +Cc: bsevens, torvalds, stable

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 151 bytes --]

On 06/17, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>
> The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.

Please see the attached patch for 5.4.y

Oleg.

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-posix-cpu-timers-fix-race-between-handle_posix_cpu_t.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2150 bytes --]

From a3dbb5447bc9a8f9c04ffa5381b0a0bd77b1bdd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 19:15:50 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 5.4.y] posix-cpu-timers: fix race between
 handle_posix_cpu_timers() and posix_cpu_timer_del()
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

commit f90fff1e152dedf52b932240ebbd670d83330eca upstream.

If an exiting non-autoreaping task has already passed exit_notify() and
calls handle_posix_cpu_timers() from IRQ, it can be reaped by its parent
or debugger right after unlock_task_sighand().

If a concurrent posix_cpu_timer_del() runs at that moment, it won't be
able to detect timer->it.cpu.firing != 0: cpu_timer_task_rcu() and/or
lock_task_sighand() will fail.

Add the tsk->exit_state check into run_posix_cpu_timers() to fix this.

This fix is not needed if CONFIG_POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK=y, because
exit_task_work() is called before exit_notify(). But the check still
makes sense, task_work_add(&tsk->posix_cputimers_work.work) will fail
anyway in this case.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Benoît Sevens <bsevens@google.com>
Fixes: 0bdd2ed4138e ("sched: run_posix_cpu_timers: Don't check ->exit_state, use lock_task_sighand()")
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
 kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
index eacb0ca30193..c77433047a9d 100644
--- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -1119,6 +1119,15 @@ void run_posix_cpu_timers(void)
 
 	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
 
+	/*
+	 * Ensure that release_task(tsk) can't happen while
+	 * handle_posix_cpu_timers() is running. Otherwise, a concurrent
+	 * posix_cpu_timer_del() may fail to lock_task_sighand(tsk) and
+	 * miss timer->it.cpu.firing != 0.
+	 */
+	if (tsk->exit_state)
+		return;
+
 	/*
 	 * The fast path checks that there are no expired thread or thread
 	 * group timers.  If that's so, just return.
-- 
2.25.1.362.g51ebf55


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] posix-cpu-timers: fix race between handle_posix_cpu_timers()" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree
  2025-06-17 17:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
@ 2025-06-19  9:02   ` Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2025-06-19  9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable; +Cc: Oleg Nesterov, Sasha Levin

[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]

Hi,

✅ All tests passed successfully. No issues detected.
No action required from the submitter.

The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: f90fff1e152dedf52b932240ebbd670d83330eca

Status in newer kernel trees:
6.15.y | Present (different SHA1: d65f6c68f7b1)
6.12.y | Present (different SHA1: 18a3e65f32ed)
6.6.y | Present (different SHA1: 8db5813e9ad7)
6.1.y | Present (different SHA1: 61fa08967f27)
5.15.y | Present (different SHA1: f6e90a3258e0)
5.10.y | Present (different SHA1: 1c179c7c3b82)

Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit:
---
1:  f90fff1e152de ! 1:  933e5cbcf266c posix-cpu-timers: fix race between handle_posix_cpu_timers() and posix_cpu_timer_del()
    @@ Metadata
     Author: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
     
      ## Commit message ##
    -    posix-cpu-timers: fix race between handle_posix_cpu_timers() and posix_cpu_timer_del()
    +    FAILED: patch "[PATCH] posix-cpu-timers: fix race between handle_posix_cpu_timers()" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree
    +
    +    On 06/17, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
    +    >
    +    > The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
    +
    +    Please see the attached patch for 5.4.y
    +
    +    Oleg.
    +
    +    From a3dbb5447bc9a8f9c04ffa5381b0a0bd77b1bdd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
    +    From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
    +    Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 19:15:50 +0200
    +    Subject: [PATCH 5.4.y] posix-cpu-timers: fix race between
    +     handle_posix_cpu_timers() and posix_cpu_timer_del()
    +    MIME-Version: 1.0
    +    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
    +    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
    +
    +    commit f90fff1e152dedf52b932240ebbd670d83330eca upstream.
     
         If an exiting non-autoreaping task has already passed exit_notify() and
         calls handle_posix_cpu_timers() from IRQ, it can be reaped by its parent
    @@ kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c: void run_posix_cpu_timers(void)
     +		return;
     +
      	/*
    - 	 * If the actual expiry is deferred to task work context and the
    - 	 * work is already scheduled there is no point to do anything here.
    + 	 * The fast path checks that there are no expired thread or thread
    + 	 * group timers.  If that's so, just return.
---

Results of testing on various branches:

| Branch                    | Patch Apply | Build Test |
|---------------------------|-------------|------------|
| stable/linux-5.4.y        |  Success    |  Success   |

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-06-19  9:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-06-17 14:47 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] posix-cpu-timers: fix race between handle_posix_cpu_timers()" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree gregkh
2025-06-17 17:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-06-19  9:02   ` Sasha Levin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).