From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 v2 04/16] x86/alternatives: Introduce int3_emulate_jcc()
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 05:04:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250618171326-7e04c16dfa905279@stable.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250617-its-5-10-v2-4-3e925a1512a1@linux.intel.com>
[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]
Hi,
✅ All tests passed successfully. No issues detected.
No action required from the submitter.
The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: db7adcfd1cec4e95155e37bc066fddab302c6340
WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and upstream commit:
Backport author: Pawan Gupta<pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Commit author: Peter Zijlstra<peterz@infradead.org>
Status in newer kernel trees:
6.15.y | Present (exact SHA1)
6.12.y | Present (exact SHA1)
6.6.y | Present (exact SHA1)
6.1.y | Present (different SHA1: 75c066485bcb)
5.15.y | Present (different SHA1: f4ba357b0739)
Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit:
---
1: db7adcfd1cec4 ! 1: fd965993ed457 x86/alternatives: Introduce int3_emulate_jcc()
@@ Metadata
## Commit message ##
x86/alternatives: Introduce int3_emulate_jcc()
+ commit db7adcfd1cec4e95155e37bc066fddab302c6340 upstream.
+
Move the kprobe Jcc emulation into int3_emulate_jcc() so it can be
used by more code -- specifically static_call() will need this.
@@ Commit message
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230123210607.057678245@infradead.org
+ Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@igalia.com>
+ Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
## arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h ##
@@ arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h: void int3_emulate_ret(struct pt_regs *regs)
---
Results of testing on various branches:
| Branch | Patch Apply | Build Test |
|---------------------------|-------------|------------|
| stable/linux-5.15.y | Success | Success |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-19 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-18 0:44 [PATCH 5.10 v2 00/16] ITS mitigation for 5.10 Pawan Gupta
2025-06-18 0:44 ` [PATCH 5.10 v2 01/16] Documentation: x86/bugs/its: Add ITS documentation Pawan Gupta
2025-06-19 9:03 ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-18 0:44 ` [PATCH 5.10 v2 02/16] x86/bhi: Define SPEC_CTRL_BHI_DIS_S Pawan Gupta
2025-06-19 9:04 ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-18 0:44 ` [PATCH 5.10 v2 03/16] x86/its: Enumerate Indirect Target Selection (ITS) bug Pawan Gupta
2025-06-19 9:04 ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-18 0:45 ` [PATCH 5.10 v2 04/16] x86/alternatives: Introduce int3_emulate_jcc() Pawan Gupta
2025-06-19 9:04 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2025-06-18 0:45 ` [PATCH 5.10 v2 05/16] x86/alternatives: Teach text_poke_bp() to patch Jcc.d32 instructions Pawan Gupta
2025-06-19 9:03 ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-18 0:45 ` [PATCH 5.10 v2 06/16] x86/its: Add support for ITS-safe indirect thunk Pawan Gupta
2025-06-19 9:03 ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-18 0:45 ` [PATCH 5.10 v2 07/16] x86/alternative: Optimize returns patching Pawan Gupta
2025-06-19 9:04 ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-23 19:10 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-06-18 0:46 ` [PATCH 5.10 v2 08/16] x86/alternatives: Remove faulty optimization Pawan Gupta
2025-06-19 9:03 ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-18 0:46 ` [PATCH 5.10 v2 09/16] x86/its: Add support for ITS-safe return thunk Pawan Gupta
2025-06-19 9:02 ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-18 0:46 ` [PATCH 5.10 v2 10/16] x86/its: Fix undefined reference to cpu_wants_rethunk_at() Pawan Gupta
2025-06-19 9:03 ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-23 19:17 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-06-18 0:46 ` [PATCH 5.10 v2 11/16] x86/its: Enable Indirect Target Selection mitigation Pawan Gupta
2025-06-19 9:04 ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-18 0:47 ` [PATCH 5.10 v2 12/16] x86/its: Add "vmexit" option to skip mitigation on some CPUs Pawan Gupta
2025-06-19 9:02 ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-18 0:47 ` [PATCH 5.10 v2 13/16] x86/modules: Set VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS in module_alloc() Pawan Gupta
2025-06-19 9:02 ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-18 0:47 ` [PATCH 5.10 v2 14/16] x86/its: Use dynamic thunks for indirect branches Pawan Gupta
2025-06-19 9:03 ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-23 19:33 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-06-18 0:47 ` [PATCH 5.10 v2 15/16] x86/its: Fix build errors when CONFIG_MODULES=n Pawan Gupta
2025-06-19 9:02 ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-18 0:48 ` [PATCH 5.10 v2 16/16] x86/its: FineIBT-paranoid vs ITS Pawan Gupta
2025-06-19 9:02 ` Sasha Levin
2025-07-12 13:50 ` [PATCH 5.10 v2 00/16] ITS mitigation for 5.10 Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250618171326-7e04c16dfa905279@stable.kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox