From: "Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@zytor.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
sohil.mehta@intel.com, brgerst@gmail.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
fenghuay@nvidia.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] x86/traps: Fix DR6/DR7 initialization
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 10:27:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250618172723.1651465-1-xin@zytor.com> (raw)
Sohil reported seeing a split lock warning when running a test that
generates userspace #DB:
x86/split lock detection: #DB: sigtrap_loop_64/4614 took a bus_lock trap at address: 0x4011ae
We investigated the issue and figured out:
1) The warning is a false positive.
2) It is not caused by the test itself.
3) It occurs even when Bus Lock Detection (BLD) is disabled.
4) It only happens on the first #DB on a CPU.
And the root cause is, at boot time, Linux zeros DR6. This leads to
different DR6 values depending on whether the CPU supports BLD:
1) On CPUs with BLD support, DR6 becomes 0xFFFF07F0 (bit 11, DR6.BLD,
is cleared).
2) On CPUs without BLD, DR6 becomes 0xFFFF0FF0.
Since only BLD-induced #DB exceptions clear DR6.BLD and other debug
exceptions leave it unchanged, even if the first #DB is unrelated to
BLD, DR6.BLD is still cleared. As a result, such a first #DB is
misinterpreted as a BLD #DB, and a false warning is triggerred.
Fix the bug by initializing DR6 by writing its architectural reset
value at boot time.
DR7 suffers from a similar issue, apply the same fix.
This patch set is based on tip/x86/urgent branch as of today.
Link to the previous patch set v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250617073234.1020644-1-xin@zytor.com/
Changes in v3:
*) Polish initialize_debug_regs() (PeterZ).
*) Rewrite the comment for DR6_RESERVED definition (Sohil and Sean).
*) Reword the patch 2's changelog using Sean's description.
*) Explain the definition of DR7_FIXED_1 (Sohil).
*) Collect TB, RB, AB (PeterZ, Sohil and Sean).
Xin Li (Intel) (2):
x86/traps: Initialize DR6 by writing its architectural reset value
x86/traps: Initialize DR7 by writing its architectural reset value
arch/x86/include/asm/debugreg.h | 19 ++++++++++++----
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/debugreg.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 24 ++++++++------------
arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++-----------
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 ++--
9 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
base-commit: 2aebf5ee43bf0ed225a09a30cf515d9f2813b759
--
2.49.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-06-18 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-18 17:27 Xin Li (Intel) [this message]
2025-06-18 17:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/traps: Initialize DR6 by writing its architectural reset value Xin Li (Intel)
2025-06-18 17:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/traps: Initialize DR7 " Xin Li (Intel)
2025-06-18 17:30 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250618172723.1651465-1-xin@zytor.com \
--to=xin@zytor.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox