From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6068278767 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 09:02:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750323766; cv=none; b=Yk6j6uxdQW1jCX+h4B+DCOIfSaHt7h0JGCYYfXTdI4MA+WeB/i1EGJ4WXxFszw+l6oMpR6UYCXxbfy51jEFMLNAnWe8bCIMaoN2A4WVcidOAWX/WRoCktY/mKes50sQOcdR2XFNMR0bEbhlZzNcgpm3Jg0ciRpBEZa9PYltW6cA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750323766; c=relaxed/simple; bh=60ukE/VPwbTlfFoOAbbkApBo3CsOu4Uw/fUlLucOGH4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YvbEKLK/Uj4sAoP9j0Z58/wJXhuwaNAHeowY5T7F5sisDPeewasY80rCWkFd8aEb93qfNrkDp+nV1B6kF+DUmI5zAiDSgLZBwJcbOKzwGu3bNRLCvUUoAm1w2d3mdwUXNGZ5gM6onqvkqp3CmXkqhhMRlnoQWQ+Y7C0FATo9gv4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=e5xZ7piJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="e5xZ7piJ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2297C4CEED; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 09:02:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1750323766; bh=60ukE/VPwbTlfFoOAbbkApBo3CsOu4Uw/fUlLucOGH4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=e5xZ7piJkhBD2uMnr8zlPl+WqpNNjRP2lIl+08zOuZb+0RflS72jz1aSWcWmYFnyp LKeR4PkcGl1bnOGS+WlXuf3kvdcYGUbWdmsnwGXzZpp8FG1dMOrlYbfK/Owr74Jb8b JcYEMQBkQOrWyhnzmXmsxkptktIJPGXEmnOKOHmYy27IBj7SGdsziNWs01rRgmx6pH T28GaHLa7+bH/2gnd59HNU51Q6LZdK+KJA9eEY5teGLCcOUN7yK0yoB9XkjH7/HtfB PUIFTv9GETJDR2rkwy5z9xlDKSN5qysfsZNuTGoeXhIuL5MTfxuXdpB7YQFRAc0b2o RqDMvrSFvYq6Q== From: Sasha Levin To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Pawan Gupta , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 v2 16/16] x86/its: FineIBT-paranoid vs ITS Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 05:02:44 -0400 Message-Id: <20250618193715-2cfe996557b3e2ab@stable.kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 In-Reply-To: <20250617-its-5-10-v2-16-3e925a1512a1@linux.intel.com> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit [ Sasha's backport helper bot ] Hi, ✅ All tests passed successfully. No issues detected. No action required from the submitter. The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: e52c1dc7455d32c8a55f9949d300e5e87d011fa6 WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and upstream commit: Backport author: Pawan Gupta Commit author: Peter Zijlstra Status in newer kernel trees: 6.15.y | Present (exact SHA1) 6.12.y | Present (different SHA1: 7e78061be78b) 6.6.y | Present (different SHA1: 772934d9062a) 6.1.y | Present (different SHA1: 69afd82670d8) 5.15.y | Present (different SHA1: cfcb2a5affbe) Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit: --- 1: e52c1dc7455d3 < -: ------------- x86/its: FineIBT-paranoid vs ITS -: ------------- > 1: b7b76a94faf76 x86/its: FineIBT-paranoid vs ITS --- Results of testing on various branches: | Branch | Patch Apply | Build Test | |---------------------------|-------------|------------| | stable/linux-5.15.y | Success | Success |