From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0F6F1DC075 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 17:56:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750442218; cv=none; b=udFucBYILlxIxz7j+RxAszWTEB05M6vBGZvOLBP7Be5owwO1iJ83U0kK9CIROn/vNM3W2PCewH1ZNKBhABF66AhLFH4IIZPHOKHng7anEguAoVpATApVmlFPMAua1oKuVXmsiyoy+8uH0bZgb7G3IQ1LXoqj61tMh7fQkjbXQt0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750442218; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uaZS2lY1wWH8ULN8cdwBfE0456jtB1TGjkviypHcMF0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ZWlCx+0hAxEyc34P5QKH45c/lsYd32gWxYQVYvsKI/t+Z1jCThgw8wj7dkHkJDt0S4ygys+hl1+nF5ywozDZGwN+HxA6PTQIi83KPhRSeTslzXadPwkbPl6CeJSpn/n6zrk2hiM2NahMtRgsw7FJvxxBAtbEFZgxUvXAkjp4B2M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ZSbX0zMN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ZSbX0zMN" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC247C4CEED; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 17:56:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1750442217; bh=uaZS2lY1wWH8ULN8cdwBfE0456jtB1TGjkviypHcMF0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZSbX0zMNd00JcRAoZMaWXD9Mx6MydhBmnzPT8MD8M+OfW6lWeg4Pf/VwE7ZOIfNLY aAMLT7UYlLdo70qfwocedYlFE7pXbXajl6YI6lOSig7KoxXslZHVzwiFQ7kdBGOBFJ S2wVHjVY1a0j8hZmXZC7p3j+AKuOZhmgEI0+Zk9NpfzLWKztHUSmVY1MCH6MmJC3xx scMEUo8A+se/LZtYdalL9BUmPQY3sK5TCWoiDR7/dQWl0vBaL6gpbjqYfYu8AUmX4w F4BYwsjEfS74JypQyPTrv3iDZF+snOiGPcPFGOIrHCZd9VlAZJpz2BIOvDJ6MEs/KK /C5fY6ac8eF2g== Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 10:56:53 -0700 From: Nathan Chancellor To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: kees@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] net: qede: Initialize qede_ll_ops with designated initializer" failed to apply to 6.15-stable tree Message-ID: <20250620175653.GA648595@ax162> References: <2025062020-pumice-wad-3173@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2025062020-pumice-wad-3173@gregkh> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 09:34:21AM +0200, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > From 960013ec5b5e86c2c096e79ce6e08bce970650b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Nathan Chancellor > Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 21:47:45 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] net: qede: Initialize qede_ll_ops with designated initializer This is one of those unfortunate situations where a patch went into mainline twice via separate trees 6b3ab7f2cbfa ("net: qede: Initialize qede_ll_ops with designated initializer") 960013ec5b5e ("net: qede: Initialize qede_ll_ops with designated initializer") and it is already in the stable trees from the first SHA, so nothing to do here. Cheers, Nathan