From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5B811E835C for ; Sat, 21 Jun 2025 08:51:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750495917; cv=none; b=msQRlwPgC8KkeJZksISZHqUhgC9/Y2RzY3/1Zg1y45BnQ93aSNozwrfVzcsEXyU+lOKn8sVkqQet/asOwoD2HWnkUQhlNglWcEKjhsAffbWx9GUP1F8YcwUepjJytDXJH5esu74TYpesQaFMZpq6B6gD20fGElUqGLnnim9JOhI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750495917; c=relaxed/simple; bh=us1MK57y6DWBrJIr77WyFhClqi7R1mE4zCFDxbHrywI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FrXpANf5ZFTfkNShOmGeUSIuB6TBHb+gEDuguI9K+DcyK/58kuWZf6lUQMP4ijgjcVu1cgdhQzjE9RJzJH94TP2nG0UxUiuoj6N3hNxwfIUHSg3rmUtqoXk5ZBUVcchhQBFdKf1XwTh/pgkvQy+ATwUD8c8BN3+9a5ghwufZaZE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=kk3yFhtx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="kk3yFhtx" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DCF50C4CEF0; Sat, 21 Jun 2025 08:51:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1750495917; bh=us1MK57y6DWBrJIr77WyFhClqi7R1mE4zCFDxbHrywI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=kk3yFhtxOMUJ1z58BCAfO7GyzdFayUOlITY2qMNBNwDHZZOMVFUUUcioBr+0jyvPA NXCuSllLLJNM5maRAVesW8YkTldqDcLqdhAamGInfYlzqihQ/HWYWWAeTnIEYhNR81 TjIs9ZxbgAsKTzm1vZD6nLwJLFEPd+otq24IoQRYwKeA8Noi58Rw2LKJsIoUDOrZja nmA/q/7Bk/TTTZzFw8f9n4L9SKaW1/kD3Md2RaSUjfaIVhvk+YgATHPsWW7JsQygmd RGcxGUJegKSG476QQUxG1nY2zJSH+3iqGeAMYZDrj6ZfXjNkgMi4XTnLhSBNCxpL9i XFXu3VTasJiyQ== From: Sasha Levin To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: WangYuli , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1/6.6] wifi: cfg80211: init wiphy_work before allocating rfkill fails Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 04:51:55 -0400 Message-Id: <20250620232247-fedbdc7782b3f56b@stable.kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit [ Sasha's backport helper bot ] Hi, ✅ All tests passed successfully. No issues detected. No action required from the submitter. The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: fc88dee89d7b63eeb17699393eb659aadf9d9b7c WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and upstream commit: Backport author: WangYuli Commit author: Edward Adam Davis Status in newer kernel trees: 6.15.y | Present (exact SHA1) 6.12.y | Not found 6.6.y | Not found Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit: --- 1: fc88dee89d7b6 ! 1: 086f38a03332b wifi: cfg80211: init wiphy_work before allocating rfkill fails @@ Metadata ## Commit message ## wifi: cfg80211: init wiphy_work before allocating rfkill fails + [ Upstream commit fc88dee89d7b63eeb17699393eb659aadf9d9b7c ] + syzbort reported a uninitialize wiphy_work_lock in cfg80211_dev_free. [1] After rfkill allocation fails, the wiphy release process will be performed, @@ Commit message Signed-off-by: Edward Adam Davis Link: https://patch.msgid.link/tencent_258DD9121DDDB9DD9A1939CFAA0D8625B107@qq.com Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg + Signed-off-by: WangYuli ## net/wireless/core.c ## @@ net/wireless/core.c: struct wiphy *wiphy_new_nm(const struct cfg80211_ops *ops, int sizeof_priv, --- Results of testing on various branches: | Branch | Patch Apply | Build Test | |---------------------------|-------------|------------| | stable/linux-6.1.y | Success | Success | | stable/linux-6.6.y | Success | Success |