From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A2EA2C9D; Mon, 23 Jun 2025 21:21:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750713685; cv=none; b=b4XZHH5MvUKnC81p+nIY8rfwR6ikHwhtc8l+5DL4lh6PmbQVqUZiwsWCXQpAeaDK5RjmnGMvdPupqGsQcek79UWy1mBdeb+weDNOanozXI/2aOy2WJIW0ycKX2ndOGs6xVXEtz1RR/ZbdAl9iUfOkLosETP7R847j30Y7KNdFmw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750713685; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MwYcWaREeongA1RsS/wbkzS1EfB+n57a0vrNm1LQgt4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=mAITBxEU7KWG8EFYQ8RJoe1KlkioGKKWFt8wtxbos1F9htiQ8OfCog5dGvE/s8oWJ3h1vTwh+KcBRR5TiG12ADiaQu8PkM19KHDyLqE/WkYiiyJsmdHqCES108pliC6nsvUaEavNP0iSVK7uPba8NFrcsXC/ve0H5qc4zvSfHs8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=qK4WAB0f; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="qK4WAB0f" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF758C4CEEA; Mon, 23 Jun 2025 21:21:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1750713685; bh=MwYcWaREeongA1RsS/wbkzS1EfB+n57a0vrNm1LQgt4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=qK4WAB0fqqh/izzH6e5eiccd/fJTYoWsEaA8YO32H7w3soAUCnTI1CNrMriKHXoiQ pW2wHnFCC08r8xisGUZTKaB0djYq1HtOyoKZFlPDcBebAqEyFlxqjb9u85gQJAiFn/ +cwMsbYRzsKEiZ0hTqirJ+MMl3q2t5CEttrTdCPY= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Jinliang Zheng , MengEn Sun , Andrea Righi , Fenggaung Wu , "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" , Andrew Morton Subject: [PATCH 6.6 084/290] mm: fix ratelimit_pages update error in dirty_ratio_handler() Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 15:05:45 +0200 Message-ID: <20250623130629.513585337@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.50.0 In-Reply-To: <20250623130626.910356556@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20250623130626.910356556@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.68 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Jinliang Zheng commit f83f362d40ccceb647f7d80eb92206733d76a36b upstream. In dirty_ratio_handler(), vm_dirty_bytes must be set to zero before calling writeback_set_ratelimit(), as global_dirty_limits() always prioritizes the value of vm_dirty_bytes. It's domain_dirty_limits() that's relevant here, not node_dirty_ok: dirty_ratio_handler writeback_set_ratelimit global_dirty_limits(&dirty_thresh) <- ratelimit_pages based on dirty_thresh domain_dirty_limits if (bytes) <- bytes = vm_dirty_bytes <--------+ thresh = f1(bytes) <- prioritizes vm_dirty_bytes | else | thresh = f2(ratio) | ratelimit_pages = f3(dirty_thresh) | vm_dirty_bytes = 0 <- it's late! ---------------------+ This causes ratelimit_pages to still use the value calculated based on vm_dirty_bytes, which is wrong now. The impact visible to userspace is difficult to capture directly because there is no procfs/sysfs interface exported to user space. However, it will have a real impact on the balance of dirty pages. For example: 1. On default, we have vm_dirty_ratio=40, vm_dirty_bytes=0 2. echo 8192 > dirty_bytes, then vm_dirty_bytes=8192, vm_dirty_ratio=0, and ratelimit_pages is calculated based on vm_dirty_bytes now. 3. echo 20 > dirty_ratio, then since vm_dirty_bytes is not reset to zero when writeback_set_ratelimit() -> global_dirty_limits() -> domain_dirty_limits() is called, reallimit_pages is still calculated based on vm_dirty_bytes instead of vm_dirty_ratio. This does not conform to the actual intent of the user. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250415090232.7544-1-alexjlzheng@tencent.com Fixes: 9d823e8f6b1b ("writeback: per task dirty rate limit") Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng Reviewed-by: MengEn Sun Cc: Andrea Righi Cc: Fenggaung Wu Cc: Jinliang Zheng Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- mm/page-writeback.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/mm/page-writeback.c +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c @@ -541,8 +541,8 @@ static int dirty_ratio_handler(struct ct ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos); if (ret == 0 && write && vm_dirty_ratio != old_ratio) { - writeback_set_ratelimit(); vm_dirty_bytes = 0; + writeback_set_ratelimit(); } return ret; }