From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org,
patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de,
conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/352] 5.10.239-rc2 review
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 16:50:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250625235008.GA4073092@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+G9fYse3W=-C0JbR6fhw=PLPy4aWUFqPwPTD0eK+x0sLidxYw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 01:32:27AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> Regressions noticed on arm64 allyesconfig build with gcc-12 on the
> stable-rc 5.10.239-rc2.
> (this allyesconfig build was skipped on rc1 due to other build regressions)
>
> This was reported on stable-rc 5.15.186-rc1 with bisection results.
> randstruct: gcc-plugin: Remove bogus void member
> [ Upstream commit e136a4062174a9a8d1c1447ca040ea81accfa6a8 ]
>
> Test environments:
> - arm64
>
> Regression Analysis:
> - New regression? Yes
> - Reproducibility? Yes
>
> Build regression: stable-rc 5.10.239-rc2 qedf_main.c field name not in
> record or union initializer
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>
> ## Build log
> drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_main.c:695:9: note: (near initialization for
> 'qedf_cb_ops.get_login_failures')
> drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_main.c:696:17: error: field name not in record
> or union initializer
> 696 | .link_update = qedf_link_update,
> | ^
This should be fixed by commit d8720235d5b5 ("scsi: qedf: Use designated
initializer for struct qed_fcoe_cb_ops") upstream.
Cheers,
Nathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-25 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-24 12:28 [PATCH 5.10 000/352] 5.10.239-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-06-24 16:30 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-06-25 7:23 ` Jon Hunter
2025-06-25 8:27 ` Dominique Martinet
2025-06-25 18:50 ` Pavel Machek
2025-06-25 20:02 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-06-25 23:50 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2025-06-25 22:37 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250625235008.GA4073092@ax162 \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hargar@microsoft.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=patches@kernelci.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=rwarsow@gmx.de \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=srw@sladewatkins.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox