From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 011842E36E7; Fri, 4 Jul 2025 16:43:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751647390; cv=none; b=kBxrZj5eu06sGaQU8gnnyn11/hZd+nmZqeVu8r6oi0LLki5paLDuG844JpVmK6PDn/DEwezsT9sV5fMOi1EMaqBb6EHHX3YRAJL1HcKK+0R/VYtmcgkKKS5HrWvcXJEFt5TNcEBuFVmQe2tFaQRr2WO2/LcT8HfVti60eCWqY0U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751647390; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4qoTOIwb2Ll+YmW6erKwLALL2nw11zW1PeP14pgP/Xs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GCLY3aF0+Ng1urkhxf5sGmsQBdeghMc1WhpEaniLxGHNiNvHpRTVXy2g4YSPTECNkS0+UQyAaOxhh4riZLde8Lg4hWaVQt9fast4HWoEPSyfL+m9ZPo10WrNJis/+y0DxuN0M73RvabJVz3EN7V5sMFWzNOQDqtHy0yZ6Lg+/tk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=afLu0Vsl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="afLu0Vsl" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5D5DC4CEE3; Fri, 4 Jul 2025 16:43:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1751647389; bh=4qoTOIwb2Ll+YmW6erKwLALL2nw11zW1PeP14pgP/Xs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=afLu0VslGJv7PPphYIsD2MxOmCvNTdXzx2L4ebspd4c++lQ9wbPscsBRFoyJf9oU4 4b7P3miACn4IbRXfgAMtsOaSM/ez/yErO0Qv7AHOTThqWbt2f+2yV46f9BuApVv/iz 4qOocp18UC+R0Tte601u6YOn1pfsGn43XcoX+/As= Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 18:43:06 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Mark Brown Cc: Pratyush Yadav , stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, Miquel Raynal , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12 212/218] spi: spi-mem: Extend spi-mem operations with a per-operation maximum frequency Message-ID: <2025070400-reshuffle-unreached-d650@gregkh> References: <20250703143955.956569535@linuxfoundation.org> <20250703144004.692234510@linuxfoundation.org> <2025070449-scruffy-difficult-5852@gregkh> <0e8c4016-3584-4db6-badb-0d6d0dc66dbe@sirena.org.uk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0e8c4016-3584-4db6-badb-0d6d0dc66dbe@sirena.org.uk> On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 03:39:05PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 02:17:18PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 01:55:59PM +0200, Pratyush Yadav wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 03 2025, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > > 6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > This and patches 213, 214, and 215 seem to be new features. So why are > > > they being added to a stable release? > > > It was to get commit 40369bfe717e ("spi: fsl-qspi: use devm function > > instead of driver remove") to apply cleanly. I'll try removing these to > > see if that commit can still apply somehow... > > It feels like if this is important for stable it's much safer to do a > specific backport rather than pull in new feature enablement? I've already dropped them, thanks!