* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/81] 6.1.144-rc2 review
2025-07-08 18:10 [PATCH 6.1 00/81] 6.1.144-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-07-08 19:05 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-07-09 6:43 ` Pavel Machek
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2025-07-08 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, hargar, broonie
On 7/8/2025 11:10 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.144 release.
> There are 81 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 10 Jul 2025 18:08:50 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.144-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/81] 6.1.144-rc2 review
2025-07-08 18:10 [PATCH 6.1 00/81] 6.1.144-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-07-08 19:05 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2025-07-09 6:43 ` Pavel Machek
2025-07-09 8:50 ` Mark Brown
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2025-07-09 6:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 641 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.144 release.
> There are 81 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.1.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
In cooperation with DENX Software Engineering GmbH, HRB 165235 Munich,
Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/81] 6.1.144-rc2 review
2025-07-08 18:10 [PATCH 6.1 00/81] 6.1.144-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-07-08 19:05 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-07-09 6:43 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2025-07-09 8:50 ` Mark Brown
2025-07-09 9:58 ` Ron Economos
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-07-09 8:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 345 bytes --]
On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 08:10:16PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.144 release.
> There are 81 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/81] 6.1.144-rc2 review
2025-07-08 18:10 [PATCH 6.1 00/81] 6.1.144-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-07-09 8:50 ` Mark Brown
@ 2025-07-09 9:58 ` Ron Economos
2025-07-09 13:39 ` Jon Hunter
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2025-07-09 9:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On 7/8/25 11:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.144 release.
> There are 81 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 10 Jul 2025 18:08:50 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.144-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/81] 6.1.144-rc2 review
2025-07-08 18:10 [PATCH 6.1 00/81] 6.1.144-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-07-09 9:58 ` Ron Economos
@ 2025-07-09 13:39 ` Jon Hunter
2025-07-09 15:15 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-07-09 20:04 ` Naresh Kamboju
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2025-07-09 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
linux-tegra, stable
On Tue, 08 Jul 2025 20:10:16 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.144 release.
> There are 81 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 10 Jul 2025 18:08:50 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.144-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.1:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
119 tests: 119 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.1.144-rc2-g10392f5749b3
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/81] 6.1.144-rc2 review
2025-07-08 18:10 [PATCH 6.1 00/81] 6.1.144-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-07-09 13:39 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2025-07-09 15:15 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-07-09 20:04 ` Naresh Kamboju
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Miguel Ojeda @ 2025-07-09 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: akpm, broonie, conor, f.fainelli, hargar, jonathanh, linux-kernel,
linux, lkft-triage, patches, patches, pavel, rwarsow, shuah, srw,
stable, sudipm.mukherjee, torvalds, Miguel Ojeda
On Tue, 08 Jul 2025 20:10:16 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.144 release.
> There are 81 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 10 Jul 2025 18:08:50 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Boot-tested under QEMU for Rust x86_64:
Tested-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Thanks!
Cheers,
Miguel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/81] 6.1.144-rc2 review
2025-07-08 18:10 [PATCH 6.1 00/81] 6.1.144-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2025-07-09 15:15 ` Miguel Ojeda
@ 2025-07-09 20:04 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-07-10 7:56 ` Niklas Schnelle
6 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2025-07-09 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
Niklas Schnelle, Alexander Gordeev, Julian Ruess, alifm
On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 at 23:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.144 release.
> There are 81 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 10 Jul 2025 18:08:50 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.144-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Regression on the stable-rc 6.1.144-rc2 s390 builds failed with clang-20
and gcc-13 toolchains with following build warnings / errors.
* s390, build
- clang-20-allmodconfig
- clang-20-defconfig
- clang-nightly-defconfig
- gcc-13-allmodconfig
- gcc-13-defconfig
- gcc-8-defconfig-fe40093d
Regression Analysis:
- New regression? Yes
- Reproducibility? Yes
Build regression: stable-rc 6.1.144-rc2 s390 pci_event.c:269:21:
error: no member named 'state_lock' in 'struct zpci_dev'
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build log
arch/s390/pci/pci_event.c:269:21: error: no member named 'state_lock'
in 'struct zpci_dev'
269 | mutex_lock(&zdev->state_lock);
| ~~~~ ^
arch/s390/pci/pci_event.c:272:24: error: no member named 'state_lock'
in 'struct zpci_dev'
272 | mutex_unlock(&zdev->state_lock);
| ~~~~ ^
arch/s390/pci/pci_event.c:279:24: error: no member named 'state_lock'
in 'struct zpci_dev'
279 | mutex_unlock(&zdev->state_lock);
| ~~~~ ^
arch/s390/pci/pci_event.c:285:23: error: no member named 'state_lock'
in 'struct zpci_dev'
285 | mutex_unlock(&zdev->state_lock);
| ~~~~ ^
4 errors generated.
## Source
* Kernel version: 6.1.144-rc2
* Git tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* Git sha: 10392f5749b37d327ec5529958e9d5d27cf07b6e
* Git describe: v6.1.143-82-g10392f5749b3
* Project: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.143-82-g10392f5749b3
* Architectures: s390
* Toolchains: gcc-13, clang-20
* Kconfigs: defconfig
## Build
* Build log: https://regressions.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/v6.1.143-82-g10392f5749b3/testruns/1565938/
* Build plan: https://tuxapi.tuxsuite.com/v1/groups/linaro/projects/lkft/builds/2zbVlOqL24w4NUJUSg3nXcHGVZ2
* Build link: https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2zbVlOqL24w4NUJUSg3nXcHGVZ2/
* Kernel config:
https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2zbVlOqL24w4NUJUSg3nXcHGVZ2/config
## Steps to reproduce
* tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch s390 --toolchain gcc-13
--kconfig defconfig
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/81] 6.1.144-rc2 review
2025-07-09 20:04 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2025-07-10 7:56 ` Niklas Schnelle
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Niklas Schnelle @ 2025-07-10 7:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Naresh Kamboju, Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
Alexander Gordeev, Julian Ruess, alifm
On Thu, 2025-07-10 at 01:34 +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 at 23:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.144 release.
> > There are 81 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 10 Jul 2025 18:08:50 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.144-rc2.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
>
> Regression on the stable-rc 6.1.144-rc2 s390 builds failed with clang-20
>
--- snip ---
>
> in 'struct zpci_dev'
> 285 | mutex_unlock(&zdev->state_lock);
> | ~~~~ ^
> 4 errors generated.
>
> ## Source
> * Kernel version: 6.1.144-rc2
>
Hi Naresh, Hi Greg,
Thanks for the report!
Looks like the backport of 45537926dd2a ("s390/pci: Fix stale function
handles in error handling") is broken. In the original commit there is
a context line mutex_lock(&zdev->state_lock) from commit bcb5d6c76903
("s390/pci: introduce lock to synchronize state of zpci_dev's") that
ended up in the stable tree without also pulling in the rest of that
commit. I found that backport in my mail and not only is the context
turned into added lines but it also adds the matching unlock in the
wrong place. Will comment on that mail too.
Thanks,
Niklas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread